Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register

Baseball

This is your chance to rate and review anything baseball related. Baseball players, baseball managers, baseball teams - everything is fair game. Write your own reviews, or read the reviews of others on all of these baseball topics.

Top Members Lists


Recent Happenings

yesterday

That is balls. The reaction time in your head to determine - I'm going to lean into this one - when it's coming at you at 90 plus, is amazing to me. These guys are pro's but still instincts kick in and it would take a lot of will power to stay in on that and actually move towards it.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

yesterday

Any player with the stones to lean into a Beckett, Santana, Webb, or Halladay heater, can take whatever he can get.

Technically, yes, its a rules violation, but its always been part of the game. And a good thing too, as far as I'm concerned.
votes 9 Helpful / 0 Funny / 2 Agree / 0 Disagree

yesterday

This would be one form of cheating that carries with it its own inherant punishment.

They say former Expo Ron Hunt has to be fed with a soup spoon and only responds to bright light and sudden movement.
votes 2 Helpful / 3 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

yesterday

There are ways to get a bit of the spitball effect - you can wipe your brow and get a little sweat on the ball, for example. This will give the pitcher a better grip, and better stuff, so long as it doesn't slip a bit out of the hand. The type of lubricant to actually qualify as a spitball would be a lump of vasoline or something that came from a pitcher's back pocket. As irishgit said, since the umps check the balls frequently in mlb this would be near impossible. Before pro ball though, a pitcher might get away with this one once or twice.
votes 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

yesterday

There were some interesting comments made during the All Star game by legendary pre-steroid players Mike Schmidt and Bob Gibson. Both essentially said that had steriods been available when they were playing they'd have used them.

It should be noted that most players are using steroids to stay in the game, not to break records. The list of users includes a hell of a lot of journeymen, most of whom didn't have much of a career spike, if any.

I'm not saying this condone the use of performance enhancing drugs but to bring a little reality to the discussion. Steroids will not make an average person a ball player, nor make an average player a superstar. Its time to stop pretending otherwise.
votes 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 3 Agree / 0 Disagree

yesterday

Also known as the Old Enlargened Ball Trick.
votes 0 Helpful / 3 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

yesterday

Unfortunately it's keeping possibly the best hitter in the history of the game out of the Hall. Bet on football!
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

yesterday

Yes it's unfair to compaire Bonds, McGwire, A-Rod, Sosa etc's homeruns with that of the Babe, for example. But would he have used steroids if he played ball in the 80's and 90's? The guy took worse care of himself than the average alcoholic. That doesn't take away the fact that it wasn't "cheating", but in the era, when most of these guys were juicing, it was as much keeping up with the Jones's, and keeping their jobs, for a lot of guys as anything else.
votes 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

yesterday

It really bothers me that fans would interfere with a home run or foul ball that could be in play, however I don't see this as cheating. It has nothing to do with the team that benefits from the interference, and sometimes goes against the home team as illustrated by the Steve Bartman example. What really upset me about that, and any interference call is that anyone sitting in a position to make a play on a ball is in an expensive seat. That doesn't mean that they may be all to knowledgeable about ball, but they should at least have some sort of knowledge that they can't make a play on a ball that is in play. They can buy a baseball for $5 at the store; let the fielder have a chance to catch the ball and not ruin it for everyone.
votes 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

yesterday

When Earl Weaver took over as manager of the Orioles, he ordered the infield grass shaved to putting green smoothness. The result was his great defensive infield of Robinson, Belanger, Johnson and Powell making spectacular plays, while balls burned by less talented teams.

Wrigley in the late eighties through late nineties went the other route, with grass high enough to need a hayrake that slowed balls down for their mediocre defensive team. Great bunting teams have had the ground near the basepaths canted slightly towards the infield so that slow rolling bunts would stay fair. Old Yankee Stadium was built with a short porch in right field to take advantage of Babe Ruth's left handed power. Old Comiskey Park moved home plate forward eight feet in the seventies to give their power hitters a bigger edge, and their pitchers more foul ground to play with.

The great thing about baseball is that is played in parks that are individual and unique. A pitcher with great stats who plays in Oakland, with its deep power alleys and exensive foul territory, may not be as effective the coziness of Boston's Fenway Park, with shorter fences and almost no foul territory. Similarly a right handed pull hitter who tears up the league at Fenway, might be a lot of long outs in Oakland. Smart teams take advantage of the configurations of their home field, and if possible enhance it.

This isn't cheating, this is making the most of the advantages.
votes 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

View Next Subject: Basketball

Top Baseball Reviewers