Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register
StanUzbeck
member since 07/26/2003
I'm a guy
User Votes: 2892 Helpful / 23 Funny / 36 Agree / 11 Disagree
RSS Icon

Activity for StanUzbeck

105 days ago

Really? This dude's gay? So friggin' what? Palahniuk is a completely crap writer, a one-trick pony, so who gives a shite that he's gay? Does that make him interesting? NO goddamn way. Chuck palahniuk is one of the worst writers to ever be so successful, and being a faggot does not legitimize him in any way. The pole smoking chizz.
votes 0 Helpful / 1 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

105 days ago

Yeah. Pretty entertaining dude, but wore homosexuality on his sleeve. I mean, he could not have been anything BUT gay. I don't really like many things this obvious, but he WAS pretty amusing.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

1120 days ago

This individual is a prime example of someone who is has completely substituted pragmatism for humanity. He is deeply intelligent but entirely bereft of morality. In many ways he is the perfect Machiavellian statesman: calculating, cynical, and ruthless. Kissinger cannot even leave the United States as he would be immediately detained and squirreled away to The Hague to face trial for crimes against humanity. This is no joke. Millions of people around the world are clamoring for a piece of him, and I am one of them. There is no amount of suffering he could possibly go through that would move me to pity him, as his actions have killed millions and enslaved millions more.
votes 5 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

1221 days ago

Guns are totally cool, but they are also totally dangerous lethal weapons. This is a pretty good issue to use to illustrate the stupidity of a two-party system. Like there are two sides to be on, and only two sides, liberal or conservative. If you oppose gun control you are necessarily expected to be pro-life, supportive of the death penalty, pro-military, and against gay marriage. If you support gun control, then you are automatically assumed to be pro-choice, for affirmative action and welfare, and against capital punishment. Complex political issues cannot be neatly divided into two opposing camps. It only encourages a simplistic world-view in which Americans feel they have to choose one side or the other. I suppose it's easier than thinking for ourselves.
votes 4 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

1221 days ago

I hate this term. It is designed to portray all liberals as being elitist while conservatives are the only "true" Americans. Listen, John Kerry may be the wealthiest man in American politics, but ALL politicians are wealthy, or at least exceedingly comfortable financially. The Kennedys were limousine liberals. So what? At least they took a principled stand. The middle-class hippies of the 1960's who protested the Vietnam war weren't making any such principled stand; they were just scared sh**less of the possibility that they might be drafted themselves. I am always puzzled by wealthy liberals. It's as if they have arbitrarily decided "Ok, we're on THIS side of the fence." They might feel guilted into supporting social programs, but I doubt they'd give up a penny of their own money to see these reforms realized.
votes 5 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

1221 days ago

Probably not a very good insult as the people it is usually directed towards would not find it offensive. They would probably be proud of being called bible-thumpers, the way that rednecks pathetically assume a certain dignity in being so identified.
votes 6 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

1221 days ago

I believe this originated in the old SNL skit "Hans and Franz", which poked fun at guys like Schwartzenegger. Typical of a Republican to repeat a joke they were originally the butt of. I also agree that it is indicative of profound misogyny and homophobia, and their attendant insecurities.
votes 7 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

1221 days ago

Wow, the last time this was a heavy insult was during the Eisenhower administration. Does anyone still use this term?
votes 4 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

1221 days ago

Good term for bellicose politicians who love to send the peasantry off to fight wars yet are themselves scared witless of violence. I mean, Dick Cheney's excuse for having not gone to Vietnam was that he "had other priorities." Well, no kidding. The 58,000 Americans killed in that idiotic war probably had more important things to do as well.
votes 8 Helpful / 0 Funny / 2 Agree / 0 Disagree

1221 days ago

Pretty childish if you ask me. Besides, what's wrong with eating cheese? Cheese is delicious. And who doesn't like monkeys? Monkeys rock! And until the 20th century, France consistently cobbled together some pretty formidable fighting forces. They had to, being at war with the English for roughly 800 years. This insult isn't even clever or witty, it's just mean-spirited and immature. Italy, for example, hasn't had a good army since the fall of Rome, and Polish armed forces have always been inept. It depresses me that our politicians resort to school yard name-calling.
votes 7 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree
By the Numbers