Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register

Military

History --> Politics --> Military. You've arrived in a dangerous area. But come as a peace-bearer, and share your opinions, hindsights, and predictions on yesterday and today's wars, weapons, and military leaders. In addition to the war discussion, you will also find weapon reviews, military aircraft reviews, rankings of top military leaders, and ship reviews.

Recent Happenings

4 days ago

I think Longstreet would have made short work of a Union counter-stroke against Seminary Ridge.

If Meade failed it was in not striking at the ANV when it was trapped against the flooding Potomac a few days after the battle.
votes 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

4 days ago

Absolutely one of the great retreats in military history. By 1944 Hitler's policy of holding territory above economy of forces resulted in most German units on the Southern Front being totally burned out. When the Russians broke through on both sides of the 1st Panzer Army, they had a massive preponderance in infantry and tanks.

Initially Hube wanted to drive due south-west, since only light Soviet forces were present in that direction. However, he followed his superior Eric Von Manstein, Commander in Chief Army Group South's orders to break out to the west. This, in spite of serious misgivings over the massive Soviet armored forces and supporting infantry in that direction.

Hube did a superb job of keeping his forces moving, and changing fronts. At the same time, Eric Von Manstein, fought battles with both Hitler and the Russians to free up the forces necessary to drive a corridor through to Hube.

Both men were successful. Hube drove due west and linked up with reinforcements gathered by Manstein and wrested from Hitler. The resulting breakout disrupted the supply lines on the Soviet armored forces and brought them to a halt, for the time-being.

Unfortunately, as a result of the confrontations necessary to get Hitler's approval, Manstein was subsequently removed from his position. The German Army on the Eastern Front never recovered from the loss of his military genius.
votes 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

5 days ago

Very tough and effective aircraft. However, the design is getting very old and in need of upgrades.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

5 days ago

So far the performance testing have been a bit troublesome. Not a true "stealth" fighter having some frontal stealth capabilities but if caught in a turn or from behind the stealth aspect greatly diminishes. It lacks some of the capabilities of the wonderful Typhoon fighter as well as the Grippen, Rafale and modern Russian fighters. And as it is made by L.M. the price has ballooned over the quoted initial pre-production price. This is not a cheap aircraft. In my humble opinion the USA has taken a huge step in the wrong direction with this aircraft. We need an air superiority fighter which we appear to have in the super expensive F22. We need a moderate yet capable fighter which we have in the F16. What we don't have is a dedicated attack plane built in large numbers. To my mind the Air Force needs only four main offensive type aircraft. (Transport and specialty aircraft are in a separate bracket) These would be the F22, upgraded F16, A10 and a modernized version of the old A7. I have seen the A7 in action and was very impressed. It has defensive options with chaff and flares. A limited short range air to air capability with fuselage mounted sidewinders. (We used them to chase Russian Bear bombers when our fighters were committed elsewhere.) It carried a wonderful 20mm cannon and a payload of up to 12,000 pounds of bombs/weapons. These aircraft are cheap to build and the radar and engines could be easily upgraded. What we lack on the modern battlefield is large numbers of cheap, effective attack aircraft to provide massive air support for our troops. Instead we are trying to make do with a few helo's and expensive duel role fighter aircraft which cannot be deployed in large enough numbers to be truly effective.... This is one of the reasons we are still in Afghanistan. (8 years now) We have not enough men and aircraft to cover the country and provide the firepower needed to win. Until the military get's away from the idea that a few super expensive planes are the wave of the future we won't be winning any wars anytime soon.
votes 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

7 days ago

I have been in the Coast Guard for almost a year now. It's just like every other service that has its days. And Boot camp was hard even though I did 4 years of ROTC on top of that having a Marine officer as my dad. So I got my ass beat alot and it was nothing compared to boot camp. It is the hardest mentally and pretty hard physically. I put on my "dream sheet" that I wanted to go to Alaska on a 378 called the Munro. And the people on there were very nice to me by showing me where to go and getting qualified so I have no idea what people are talking about it being a shady service. For all the people who are writing on here and aren't even in the military, go fuck yourself. I was on patrol in the Bering Sea and I saw things out there that I didnt think was possible such as 40 foot seas and 140 knot winds. It's really hell out there and we aren't given the respect that we deserve. Yes this service has a lot of shitbags in it but isn't that with everything in this world? In Kodiak, Ak people depend on you to save their husbands and sons while they are doing one of the hardest jobs, crab fishing. What are you supposed to tell them when you had their son or husband drowning and you couldnt get to them because you just gave up? Exactly my point. It takes alot out of you as an AST. I'm not one but my best friend here is one and I respect him greatly. So shutup giving shit to the Coast Guard because its not that bad. If you can't handle the work on a boat then there is a word for you... Pussy. Plain and simple.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

View Next Category: Movies

Top Military Reviewers