Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register
edt4
member since 01/14/2005
I'm a guy
User Votes: 12114 Helpful / 744 Funny / 1662 Agree / 259 Disagree
RSS Icon

Activity for edt4

6 hours ago

Comment Icon edt4 commented on a review of Magnus in Weird Baby Names:
If memory serves me right, I think there was a Magnus Johnson who was some kind of politician in Minnesota in the 20's or 30's. Do you know if your Magnus Johnson might be a relation?

23 hours ago

Given this is a work by noted French surrealist and poet Georges Bataille, I've included it in the "classic literature" section, although I've noted some of Bataille's other works confined to the "horror" category. Which, on further reflection, is somehow appropriate. I'm admittedly not a great fan-- while Bataille writes beautifully, even in translation, and his vision of humanity is essentially dark (Sartre wrote of him, "Bataille speaks about man's condition, not his nature. Bataille has survived the death of God. In him, reality is conflict."), I personally find his vision stultifying after awhile.

"My Mother", the fullest of the 3 stories, deals with a semi-incestuous relationship between a mother and son that becomes fully incestuous during the course of the story. The "mother" takes great pleasure and pride in her own degradation, and seems enthusiastically and voyeuristically interested in the less-than-normal sex life of her son. The other 2 stories are more fragmentary and more overtly pornographic, but are essentially just as grim as "My Mother".

Bataille was a much better writer than the Marquis De Sade (whom he admired) but De Sade, for all his written depravity (and if you've read uncensored De Sade, it's over-the-top depravity), was occasionally capable of humor (grim though it might have been) and, while far more simplistic philosophically, was...dare I say it?...a much more entertaining writer. Not that one would be inclined to read Bartaille for "entertainment", as such, but if you want philosophy, read Sartre or Nietzsche. If you want poetry, there are far superior and enlightening poets out there.

In my own opinion, Bataille, while influential in his own right, is destined to remain a fringe, or cult, literary figure, and may, as the years pass, be completely forgotten. "My Mother; Madame Edwarda; The Dead Man" does nothing to change that conviction of mine.

Add your Vote:

Votes on this review: 4 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

yesterday

Very true.

yesterday

When I was in high school, our principal called my class into the auditorium once and lectured us on how we were the most "apathetic" class it had ever been his misfortune to witness. Not long after that "Up With People" came and performed a show for us (all I can really remember of that show is that they had the mindless cheerfulness of cult members, and their signature song had them swinging their arms around and singing, "Up...up...UP!!! with people!!!"). I don't remember that it improved or ameliorated our collective apathy. Maybe if they had brought the Who in...

Add your Vote:

Votes on this review: 2 Helpful / 3 Funny / 3 Agree / 0 Disagree

yesterday

I have to confess that by the time they came on at half time, I had already traveled far down the road towards Shit-Land (those jello shots were kickin' in big time)...far enough down that well-traveled road that I actually expressed to those sitting next to me, "Wow, they actually sound pretty good, no?" The lady handing out the jello shots from a tray backtracked toward me and said, "Ah...have another one, Ed."

The Who were a great, legendary band, but by the time they did the "Who Are You?" album, I had lost interest (although I did agree to attend one of their concerts with some friends after Moon died). The drummer they had at the half-time show did make me long for the power-drumming of the late, lamented Keith Moon, and the bassist wasn't even shown once. And I noticed they were using the same laser beam light show (times 10) that they had used when I saw them in 1979 at Madison Square Garden.

I found myself vaguely wishing that Abbie Hoffman, or his modern day equivalent, had been around so that they could jump up on the stage to read some half-assed political manifesto and get whacked in the head by Townshend's guitar.

Now THAT would have been entertaining!

Add your Vote:

Votes on this review: 3 Helpful / 5 Funny / 3 Agree / 0 Disagree

2 days ago

Before I discovered the Stooges, there was Black Sabbath, and I revered them. As a young teen, I first saw them performing "Hole In The Sky" on Don Kirshner's TV "Rock Concert" (you can find that particular performance on Youtube) and it was love at first sight (and listen). I became a fanatic, pooling my meager newspaper delivery boy money so I could buy every album they had put out...and stealing those I couldn't afford. In fact, the first rock concert I ever attended (and I was really too young for it) was at Madison Square Garden on December 5, 1976-- a double bill of Ted Nugent and Black Sabbath (Black Sabbath was hours late in appearing as Ozzy was hopelessly fucked up backstage). As great as "Hole In The Sky" was, "Sabbath Bloody Sabbath" soon supplanted it, and I listened to it constantly (my younger sister had her bedroom next to mine, and when I would play it...constantly...she would pound on the wall, and I would turn my record player volume up until finally my exasperated father would trudge upstairs and yell out at the both of us, "DAMNIT, WILL YOU BOTH CUT OUT THE CRAP?!?").

Even though I became more involved in groups like the Stooges and the Dolls, I followed Sabbath up until Ozzy left. As an adult, "War Pigs" is the song I listen to most often, but "Sabbath Bloody Sabbath" and, to a lesser extent, "Snowblind" (I actually was naive enough in those days to think he was singing about an Arctic storm!) remain enjoyable, invigorating listens.

Add your Vote:

Votes on this review: 4 Helpful / 1 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

2 days ago

Let's be honest; this isn't anyone's idea of a "classic"'-- it's silly, fatuous, and borderline racist (where would those comical South Americans be if it weren't for virtuous, competent Americans showing them what civilization was all about while milking their country dry of its resources?), but it's also a lot of fun. Unlike a lot of films from this period, it can still be enjoyed today. With reservations, of course.

It's fun because Cagney and Pat O'Brien are in it. Cagney isn't really acting here...although he appears to be enjoying himself...and O'Brien overacts, but I suspect I could watch these 2 cinematic giants read a phone book, and get something out of it. Ann Sheridan also appears as Cagney's love interest. She's competent, and easy on the eyes, but I never thought she was ever the actress that Virginia Mayo, as one example, was. Also watch for George "Superman" Reeves as one of the South Americans.

The script, while jingoistically simplistic, is somewhat unusual for 1940 Hollywood. The action takes place on a South American banana plantation. A shrill, frenetic O'Brien is in charge and he's at wit's end, bedeviled by lacksadaisical workers and a humorous revolutionary played by George Tobias (Castro wasn't in the international picture yet, but you have to wonder what he would make of this role, if he ever deigned to see the film). Like ethnics in all these Hollywood pictures, the South Americans are dopey clowns and obviously are in need of stern, paternalistic American guidance. Also annoying are some of the supporting actors; in particular, Andy Devine, whose whiny, raspy voice grated on my nerves like fingernails on a blackboard.

Still, those reservations aside, this is still a fun film (albeit a minor one), a diverting, entertaining 88 minutes. Then again, how bad could anything be that stars Cagney and O'Brien?

Add your Vote:

Votes on this review: 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

2 days ago

Thanks. My hope is that when I get there tonight, the crowd will already have their drunk on and care less about what I have to say regarding the game.

The next time we talk, I expect I'll be mightily hung over.

3 days ago

I think we'd be a more enlightened (and less polarized) society if we emphasized cooperation rather than conflict.

Add your Vote:

Votes on this review: 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 2 Agree / 0 Disagree

3 days ago

Like most religious writing, it has a great deal of truth, beauty, and wisdom in it. Based on my reading of it, though (and that of others), it also contains a great deal of ugliness, small-mindedness and prejudice, and...despite the protestations of the religious...a great deal of contradiction. Almost every historical maniac, from every extreme of the political and/or social spectrum, has been able to find some kind of justification or rationalization for their acts in scripture (both Catholicism and Protestantism contain their share of lunatics, but I've always been personally more mistrustful of Protestant lunatics; they don't need an intermediary to interpret their scripture--- God speaks directly to them. How come God always speaks directly to them but never has much to say to an average schlub like me?).

Scripture is a valid method to seek enlightenment, in my opinion, but it has no more validity, or less, than the Koran, or the teachings of Buddha, or Hinduism, etc.

Add your Vote:

Votes on this review: 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree
By the Numbers