Spike65 06/29/2008
For those who couldn't get enough from the first film it was very enjoyable. Sort of a less interesting continuation of the first film. Worth a rental although it has been on cable so many times everyone should have seen it at least once.
Helpful
Funny
Agree
Disagree
Jeremy00081 09/14/2006
Good sequel to a great movie. Most of the actors from the original cast return to be preyed upon by a another mask-wearing psycho with anger issues. I know a lot of people think the "Scream" films are for dumb teenagers who wouldn't know a good horror movie if it bit them in the $%@, but that's not the case. These are very entertaining films.
mystic mango 11/25/2004
The first one was bad. This one is worse.
Jamie McBain 06/23/2004
The original was better.
"Da Bitch" 08/21/2003
Beter than the last one!!!
laserblaze21 08/09/2003
I thought this was a pretty worthy movie but the first one is still the best out of the series.I thought the ending was too goofy and the killers were pretty much surprising because we never got to know them in the movie which made the movie a bit stupid.Other than that and the goofy deaths(Cici died :( ) this movie is good.
norman bates 03/27/2003
awsome followup
Redoedo 03/02/2003
Scream 2 was much better than the first film, as the first film got pretty predictable after the first half of the movie. However, this one was quite a shocker as I had no idea that either Mickey or Debbie Salt would be the killer. I suspected that Salt was maybe not who she said she was, but I never suspected that she would be Billy Loomis's mother. Overall, a good followup to the origional. A film very, very well done!
ofofofof 08/14/2002
pretty good!
Dolliac 04/17/2002
Hip, Funny, and SCARY sequel to the first. Believable performances, good soundtrack, and great direction ideas make this a worth while film. Starts out with a BANG (killing Jada Pinkett-Smith was hillarious...she did a really good job), and IS all the way through. Another great ScArY scene was with Sarah Michelle Gellar (she always seems to make the best out of her pretty blonde girl with a large boosum roles) running through her deserted serority house, only to be thrown off the roof...damn!
norelle 04/03/2002
not scary .
joeAwaz 11/02/2001
As far as entertainment goes, both Scream movies are pretty much neck and neck. But the best film of the two is definately this one! This is the perfect example of what a modern-day horror movie is all about. Along with Silence of the Lambs & Scream, this is probably one of the best horror movies of the 90s, if you ask me.
Turtle488 06/30/2001
It's my favorite of the Scream trilogy. I just hate Dewey...
Cloud 05/09/2001
This movie sucks so badly that I can't explain it. Neve kills yet another role. But Randy's character saved a little bit of the movie. He's so great I give him a five. The rest of the movie was pitiful though.
callmetootie 04/14/2001
Scream 2 is a big imrpovement over the original. First of all, we lose all of those extremly annoying characters from the original and gain some smart ones, and Neve Campbell is ready to let out one good scream at the end, and then fight the bad guy. The costumes haven't really changed, but the violence tone has, which makes it more watchable.
tazmiran 11/24/2000
The sequels to this movie were even dumber than the originals. These people can't act in a horror movie.
Poly 11/24/2000
Not as good as the first one but the opening was good. I didn't like how they killed off the two black people in the first five minutes. Like the first one, it was interesting to find out who was the killer, but I didn't like how the killed off the funny guy who liked movies. They should have killed Dewey.
crazyderek 11/21/2000
I thought this movie was horrible. The plot was very boring to me. It was like watching the first one all over again, and the ending was the same. The whole movie followed the first one, and it wasn't even that scary.
lilriz 11/14/2000
This movie proved the theory that scary movie sequels suck. It's almost as if they thought of the story as they filmed the movie. It had little intelligence and couldn't live up to the first one.
ElRudes 11/10/2000
It was hard to follow up on the original Scream. It didn't seem as dramatic, but the storyline was okay. Slightly unbelieveable ending.
nguyenkha 11/01/2000
As you know, sequels aren't as good as the original. Scream 2 has a terrible plot and a terrible cast, with the exception of Jennifer Love Hewitt.
sarah2 11/01/2000
This movie does not make sense. This guy never dies. He just keeps coming back when he was supposed to be dead.
Q7SOCCER 10/11/2000
No matter how many Scream movies will be made, they will all be horrible. Every 'unexpected' spook and fright can be seen a mile away. When someone is walking through the dark and the camera is on close-up, of course the chick will turn around to find someone there. Don't go to get scared. You should take your girl, so she can hold on to you.
mrez10212et 08/26/2000
A dumb, pointless, and defintely not scary "horror" film. Don't waste your time.
Jans7884du 06/26/2000
This one was not as good as the first Scream. The ending was pretty weird too. I wasn't very impressed.
Isda7591du 06/20/2000
Scream 2 was not nearly as good as Scream the original. It was quite predictable, for they used the same scare tactics as Scream. It was still good, but nothing compared to the original. It was at least worth seeing.
lyla7393du 06/15/2000
After seeing and thoroughly enjoying Scream, I had high expectations for this sequel. However, I was extremely disappointed. The story was very predictable and lacked the fright\excitement of the first movie.
danc2947om 12/12/1999
Got tired of screaming. Pls don't make the third sequel!! Enough already...
28 reviews! « Previous | Page of 1 | Next »
Sort by Newest Oldest Most helpful Least helpful Highest rated Lowest rated