eHarmony
1
READ THIS IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF EHARMONY OR THINKING ABOUT JOINING!!
i am now about 5 weeks into eharmony and have not received a single match in well over 2 weeks (which was approximately the time i wrote the last review). i actually went through my matches and got some raw numbers. i think you will all find this analysis interesting.
97 matches is how many i've had in 5 weeks (really 2.5 weeks and nothing the other 2.5 weeks). i also say in my preferences "no one outside of 30km of Dallas, Tx" and no one that smokes "a few times a day." i didn't look at the smokers, but as for the 30km i looked and 34 of my 97 matches are 50km out and more. the borderline 30km-40km i counted (ft worth and surrounding), although i would never drive to ft. worth for a girlfriend. but for numbers sake i counted it. so conclusion of this is that 1/3rd of my matches didn't even fit my simple distance parameters.
furthermore i read two different numbers - 11% and 24%, which were apparently reported numbers of eharmony's subscription rate per their members. as any member knows, you cannot view a match unless you are a member, which also means you cannot communicate to a match unless you are a member. also if you are a member, eharmony doesn't filter out all of the non-members. so if you average 11 and 24 percent, say about 17%, you'll find that of my 97 matches about 17 of them are actually members and capable of responding to me. now you take the 1/3rd distance rule and apply that to the number 17 (from the paragraph above 1/3rd are actually out of my territory), you get about 11. so 11 of 97 is where we are at of girls that fit my distance parameters (within reason) and that are members.
i took this a step further and i even looked through and also sorted all of the attractive girls (even the mild-medium ones) and found that 14 of the 97 were in the semi-attractive or better range. i put the "no picture" or "show at a later date" pictures with the unattractive ones because it's probably true OR they probably aren't members and never cared to take the time to post a picture. so 14 of 97 were attractive, which is about 14%. you take 14% of 11 and you now have a grand total of 1.54 chicks that can actually be a match to me within my mind about what an ideal match would be based on distance, looks, and eharmony's subscription rate ONLY. 1.54 matches.
i actually have met one person. she is a pretty nice girl, but her pictures made her look much more attractive than she actually is. she is not thin, but she is not fat. within a milisecond of seeing her i knew it just wouldn't work between us physically. we remain in touch to some extent, but we both understand there is no real connection there. she also smoked the entire time we were together having a drink or two. i guess i can't be too upset eharmony brought a friend to me, but that's all it did and hell i never saw the "meet a friend today" line in their advertisements. good thing i now have .54 chicks left to go for my $110 i spent.