I am not clear why anyone would consider Hillary Clinton to be a viable presidential candidate. What are her qualifications? She did go to law school, she was a lawyer for many years in a small state capitol and was married to a former governor and president. Now she is in her first term as a US senator. Since when are those sufficient qualifications to become president? I notice that the ratings for Barak Obama consistently mention his lack of experience. I would suggest that the same is true for Mrs. Clinton. Almost all of her political experience comes from being First Lady. Does this mean that Republicans should nominate Laura Bush? I don't get it. Being married to a former president is no qualification for being president oneself. And, if we examine her one bit of experience in the White House (the health care initiative), we find that it was a fiasco. Can anyone elighten me as to why she is even considered?