History does no such thing. The physical actualities of Jesus have NEVER been established (let alone the conveyed claims of divinity); his formative years are all but dust in the wind (even the authorized Bible skips over them); there is no credible evidence that the town of Nazareth ever existed during the time he was alleged to have dwelt there (although plenty of instances CAN be made for Hellenistic sleight-of-hand); the New Testament provides a false biography of Jesus, as you have to look to the Gospel accounts, which were written upwards of 60 years after his purported death (the earlier Pauline writings only had him pegged as a god, nothing of flesh-and-bone tangibility); every current contemporary extrabiblical reference to Jesus has been shown to be, at best, speculative and, at worst, fraudulent; both the trial and death of Jesus are self-contradictory and filled with procedural and legal errors; and the differing geographic locales of the resurrection finish off the rampant suppositions of historicity. Most modern (post-1800) scholars have put this subject to bed, and with good reason.
