Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register

Eric Clapton (guitar)

reviewed by heashon2000

By the time Eric Clapton launched his solo career with the release of his self-titled debut album in mid-1970, he was long established as one of the world's major rock stars due to ...
Read More

heashon2000
12/01/2005

Eric Clapton (guitar) 2

Captain Kirk, I'm sorry, but I have to agree with stanuzbeck. I realize Clapton was part of a group of guitarists that probably inspired many great players and pioneered a great slow-hand style, but in terms of a player/performer and being rated with the greats, I have to reiterate that he is indeed (to quote Stan) the "Most ridiculously overrated guitar player of all time". I viewed a concert with Eric playing with the original members of Cream on public television (2005 performance) last night, and I have to say that I found his playing, lifeless, loose, and uninteresting (with the exception of a few little things here and there that were neat, but in now way outstanding). I guess, what I'm confused about is the particular or specific aspect of Clapton's guitar playing that warrants his exhaultation. What is it about his playing that generates such a popular appeal? Here's some attributes that he's been praised for and some guitar players that I think would be much better recognized canidates for those attributes. Slow-hand style - David Gilmore from Pink Floyd has Clapton beat by far in this area. Blues - I can think of a thousand blues guitar players I'd rather listen to just because of the skill level alone. Just listen to BB King. Song-writing - Please, I find his style mediocre at best. I find his chord progressions to be repetitive, basic, and very non-inventive. Take Cocaine for example, this is two etremelly basic riffs with a solo over the main riff. Jimmy Page was the guitarist to look for in those days in terms of composition. Guitar innovation - I really don't think Clapton was doing anything that everyone else wasn't already doing in those days. Again, Jimmy Page was probably at the forefront of innovation in this time. Sorry to be so negative about a fellow guitar player, but I just think people looked past what was important in a guitar player when recognizing Clapton probably because in those days not as many people knew how to play a guitar and that he was more of a name than a player. Kind of like brand-name jeans.

Join to vote! 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree
Showing 1 Comment
You must be logged in to comment. login now.
jorgenc commented 1110 days ago.
Your'e damn right!. Clapton sucks like hell. His music is for old divorced farts. It's boring and mediocre. Really basic guitarplaying. His music is based on marketing and commercials. People buys music which is promoted in the right way. Clapton is an old fart, he has been i the buissnis for a long time. He knows the right "people" As you say: It wasn't many guitarplayers around when he started out. If he would start up today he wouldn't get a gig at the local bar. It's amazing what people consider to be good. Clapton music is a big scam. Eweryone talks about the" feeling". It's like a stupid excuse for lack of technique. If you can't play proparly you have "feeling". It's stupid! He doesn't fool real musicians.
Showing 1 Comment
About This Reviewer
By the Numbers