Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register

Abraham Lincoln (1861-1865)

reviewed by Loerke

Born in 1809, Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860. Shortly thereafter, several southern states seceded from the Union, forming the Confederate States of America. With the ...
Read More

Loerke
04/08/2007

Abraham Lincoln (1861-1865) 5

Yes, Lincoln may have violated the Constitution, but in doing so he took a somewhat backward republic and turned it into the global democracy we are proud of today. He recognized the limits of the legalistic thinking that was always willing to find some clause to protect the rights of slaveowners while ignoring the more basic and universal rights of humanity. Yes, it is true that he did not hold blacks in as high esteem as we would wish, but we should recognize that this was part of his strategy of incorporating the views of the opposition -- even in beginning the war was careful not to speak too much of the divisive issue of slavery in the hope that some Southerners would refuse to join the Confederacy. Remarkably, he managed to adhere to his radical principle of equality while also ensuring that all viewpoints were considered. Lincoln is our only president whose greatness is beyond question.

Join to vote! 6 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree
Showing 2 Comments
You must be logged in to comment. login now.
Jed1000 commented 961 days ago.
Good review. Historically accurate as well.

Broodinghen commented 961 days ago.
It's perfectly okay to find Lincoln great, but to grant him greatness beyond question, that's too much! Everyone's alleged greatness must be questioned, all the more if bloodshed and breaking of rules is involved. Lincoln presided over unprecedented carnage and devastation and it must be allowed to doubt if all this was necessary or appropriate. No one who sends men to battlefields for the sake of an idea can expect that everyone sees eye to eye with him. And it was an IDEA that the Union must be preserved. Ideas, however great they may seem, must not be accepted without discussion. It's the only way of finding out if they are worth dying for. I'd argue that the price for the preservation of the Union exceeded its value by far. As the value itself was obviously very high, I'd also argue that acquiring it at such a price was nevertheless appropriate. It's just not something that I'd call great.
Showing 2 Comments
About This Reviewer
By the Numbers