Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register

James Knox Polk (1845-1849)

reviewed by Loerke

Loerke
04/08/2007

James Knox Polk (1845-1849) 1

Polk may have taken a bigger fall among the historians than just about any U.S. president. In the late nineteenth century, a few historians ranked him as the very greatest American president. But when we look back nowadays, he seems completely unscrupulous. The major event of his administration was the war he provoked with Mexico. Let's consider that war: it was started by a president from the South who felt that the regime in Mexico was corrupt, undemocratic, and unable to control its most fanatical citizens; that that regime controlled resources crucial to the U.S. economy; that its strength was a direct threat to U.S. national security; and that it had engaged in killing American citizens. Sound familiar?

Join to vote! 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree
Showing 1 Comment
You must be logged in to comment. login now.
Broodinghen commented 959 days ago.
What if Polk just recognized other limits of the legalistic thinking than Lincoln? Without Polk's resolution to clear the situation with Mexico, even at the risk of a war, the trouble with the uncalculable neighbouring nation might have protracted for years, or even decades. Same applies to the quarrel over the western expansion in case Polk had not ended it by completing the process at maximum speed. Those measures do not seem unreasonable in themselves, but their implementation by guile and force is a problem. As ethics are involved, Polk's measures cannot find the approval of all schools of thought and there are plausible reasons for rating him low as well as for rating him high. That Mr. Polk's war had some superficial resemblances with Mr. Bush's war is not a plausible reason. All the more as Mr. Bush's war is not yet over.
Showing 1 Comment
About This Reviewer
By the Numbers