Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register

Barack Obama (Democrat)

reviewed by SilverFox

Barack Obama, born August 4, 1961 in Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S. Senator from Illinois. A "draft Obama" movement began with his well-received keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National ...
Read More

SilverFox
11/05/2008

Barack Obama (Democrat) 5

POST-ELECTION UPDATE: Now that Obama has become our President-elect, I join in his hope that we can mend our partisan differences and get a fresh start by joining together in a united effort to begin solving the very serious problems our country faces. The bitter partisanship has become so divisive over the years that it has hurt all of us in varying ways. It's time to start thinking of ourselves first and foremost as Americans rather than Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, always at each other's throats. That's the patriotic thing to do.

We have worse enemies than our fellow citizens. There's a lot of bitterness and anger with each other to get past, but with some time, effort, and, most importantly, intention, we can overcome our differences and unite as Americans. That's the opportunity that we now have. Forgiveness is a great healer of wounds.

McCain has, as Obama stated, served his country well in ways that most of us can't even begin to really identify with. Let's let it go. Let's get over each other.

Note: Just received word from a friend in Switzerland re straw polls they've run in Europe. 89% of the Swiss would have voted for Obama, and 75% of all of Europe. So Europe is hoping this signals an opportunity to strengthen our alliances with them again.

ORIGINAL COMMENT: First, I want a President who's a lot smarter than most of us. Barack Obama graduated magna cum laude from Harvard law school, arguably the best law school in the nation. The highest honor one can achieve in law school is not only to be among the elite few to be selected for the law review (a scholarly journal focusing on legal issues), but to be elected its editor-in-chief. He was the first black ever to do so. Got his B.A. from Columbia, where he majored in political science with a specialization in international relations. He was a lecturer of constitutional law at the U. of Chicago Law School, another of the best law schools in the U.S., from 1993 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004.

Second, I want a President with outstanding character and morality (for a change). Obama strikes me as a guy who who has just that, and I've read nothing but good things about him in that respect. Third, while executive experience is a plus, it's not a necessity. Abraham Lincoln and JFK did just fine for not having previously been political executives. I think Obama has demonstrated he can manage political campaigns and his U.S. and state senate offices well, and there's no reason to think he couldn't manage well as President. The staff Obama recruited for his Senate office were "considered exceptional for a first-term incoming senator." Wikipedia, Barack Obama.

Finally, I want a President who has acted on his beliefs, not just talked about them. For only having been in the U.S. Senate (nearly) four years, Obama's accomplishments are impressive; see the Wikipedia article. For his stances on the major issues, see Issues. He's a strategic thinker and very analytical. In the fall of 2002, before the start of the Iraq War, he was extraordinarily prescient in saying "I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda. I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars. You want a fight, President Bush? Let's finish the fight with Bin Laden and al-Qaeda, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings." Some reviewers have stated he wants to "invade" Pakistan. That's BS; he wants Pakistan as an ally. The one out-of-context sentence of Obama's seized upon by some reviewers was: "If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets [in the mountains of Pakistan] and President Musharraf wont act, we will." For the actual text of that speech, see it here. Here are the pertinent parts of the speech: "[Our] security is most threatened by the al-Qaeda and Taliban sanctuary in the tribal regions of northwest Pakistan. Al-Qaeda terrorists train, travel, and maintain global communications in this safe-haven. The Taliban pursues a hit and run strategy, striking in Afghanistan, then skulking across the border to safety. . . . There must be no safe-haven for terrorists who threaten America. . . . I understand that President Musharraf has his own challenges. But let me make this clear. There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al-Qaeda leadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf wont act, we will. . . . We must help Pakistan invest in the provinces along the Afghan border, so that the extremists program of hate is met with one of hope."

Add your vote! 5 Helpful / 1 Funny / 2 Agree / 0 Disagree
Showing 10 Comments
You must be logged in to comment. login now.
MariusQelDroma commented 814 days ago.
Caution: Wikipedia as a single source of information on a subject is not entirely reliable. Always good to cross-reference with other material to subtract out all the spin.

SilverFox commented 814 days ago.
On the other hand, it's free and very easy to access. I think it's fine for RIA. Most reviewers don't appear to check their facts anyway. There's really no good excuse not to check at least Wikipedia before spouting off. And there have been several comparative studies that suggest that the science entries of Wikipedia are of a similar order of accuracy and similar rates of both serious and minor errors to Encyclopædia Britannica. Not many comparative studies of non-science articles.

SilverFox commented 814 days ago.
GoinDownSlow: So you're the name-calling type who loves to resort to personal attacks on other reviewers when you disagree with them. I just love you guys. Another winner. You have the nerve to call me a pseudo-intellectual? Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. I've read over 100 of your reviews and not one of them has any depth or real analysis. Your most in-depth review was of an energy bar. As far as Wikipedia is concerned, the science articles are the only ones to have been the subject of a number of comparative studies, so tell me, smart guy, how else can one judge the overall accuracy of Wikipedia? Did you ever hear of the words "inference" or "analogy"? Apparently not. So I'll contribute to your education by giving you the dictionary definitions. "Inference: the reasoning involved in drawing a conclusion or making a logical judgment on the basis of circumstantial evidence and prior conclusions rather than on the basis of direct observation." "Analogy: an inference that if things agree in some respects they probably agree in others." If the presidential candidate you support wouldn't invade Pakistan to keep al-Quaeda from getting control of Pakistan's nuclear weapons, then he's not the person to be running this country. And you're conveniently ignoring the rest of what Obama said. I doubt that you took the trouble to read his speech, even though I gave you the direct link to it. 99% of what he said was about keeping Pakistan as an ally and how to make it a better ally. You get YOUR facts straight, ace.

SilverFox commented 814 days ago.
Marius: I welcome any suggestions as to sources that may be more consistently reliable than Wikipedia, but the qualifications are that they have to be free and easily accessible on the Internet.

SilverFox commented 813 days ago.
If you want to continue your flaming and personal insults, by all means do so, since you appear to enjoy it so much, but you'll have to find another target, ace. You started with the name calling, and I'm not going to perpetuate your childish games. Your comments speak volumes about your personality. If you ever want to have a civil discussion, let me know.

louiethe20th commented 813 days ago.
www.Obamatruth.org

slocke commented 409 days ago.
Graduation from Harvard does not a president make. Give me a break

slocke commented 393 days ago.
Wonder if you would be this positive All American if things had gone the other way. I am guessing not. Also, the reason the rest of the country would vote for Obama and are celebrating the fact tht he won is because they know that he has no clue and that NOW the Most powerful country in the world is now the MOST vulnerable.

SilverFox commented 393 days ago.
To the contrary, there are many reasons to celebrate Obama's win. It is neither purely ideological nor based solely on race. It is significant to those who have shared in the long, hard struggle of blacks to be treated equally, which is all they have ever asked for. It's significant that Obama has been elected because it shows that a large percentage of the population either ignored his skin color or voted for him in spite of it because they recognized his many talents. That's a first in a struggle that has taken blacks over 200 years. Second, of course it's partly ideological, but in a hopeful way, that Obama offers the possibility of progress to all people, even though of differing political persuasions. Had McCain won, I wouldn't be jubilant, as I am now, but I think I would have responded to a call for unity if I felt he sincerely meant it. The Bush administration claimed they wanted to be inclusive, but their actions proved otherwise, which alienated many of us on the other side of the aisle.

Bird808 commented 388 days ago.
I personally thought this was a well written review. I think the majority of Americans have done the right thing. Not just for America, but for the rest of the world. Let's be honest Barrack Obama is the right person for the job this time around. After eight years nothing positive has come out of the Bush administration. Just misery.
Showing 10 Comments
About This Reviewer
By the Numbers