Cloverfield
5
Great movie, but pay heed to the cautions that you might throw up.
SYNOPSIS: Coming from the viewpoint of young New Yorkers with a handheld camera (evidentally with an amazing battery life), it's a "eyewitness" account of a gigantic bizarre monster attack on Manhattan.
PROS: The concept of the handheld camera fake eyewitness accounts didn't work for Blair Witch, in my opinion, but I think this time they got it right: unlike Blair Witch, yes, they had a script (some of which is kinda cheesy), and they had a lot of special effects. Which you're going to need when you have a beheaded Statue of Liberty.
CONS: It's going to be one of those "either you love it or you hate it" movies. The "covenient" catching of all the important things by the camera is a little too perfect at times, which ruins the illusion if only for a moment. And, of course, the nausea from the camera motion. A lot of people aren't going to be affected by it, but I was. Not even halfway through, I felt pretty miserable. I felt like I was going to chuck right up until I went to sleep. Never did, though, so I consider that a "win" on my part. And the end was kinda lame.
OVERALL: Don't come into the theater expecting any explanations, or any actual plausible reason on how this funky looking monster just came out of nowhere and started tearing up the city. It's a very narrow viewpoint we're looking through here: if the characters don't know it happened, then you don't know. You're going to walk out with a lot of questions that you're not going to have answers for, and that's the point of the movie. If you can accept that, you can enjoy this movie.