Offensive? If so, surely we need to redefine the word. Opinionated? For sure, but considering that this is supposed to be an "opinion" website, isn't that a virtue? Do we really need a reviewer like...I dunno..."LukewarmFromBoise" whose opinion on every topic runs along the lines of..."Well, whatever you guys think...whatever the majority opinion is...that's ok with me too. Yeah, now that you mention it, Obama does rhyme with Osama, doesn't it? And, yeah, that also sounds right...better to fight over there so we don't have to fight over here or...ah, something like that. Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. Whatever. Count me in." Those who challenge him without too much thought and too much belligerency do tend to get verbally eviscerated...in other words, he doesn't suffer fools gladly, but I've never seen him respond offensively to those who challenge him in a reasonable, non-junkyard-dog manner. Most of the reviewers on this list-- Irishgit, Oscargamblesfro, GenghisTheHun, etc.-- tend to be the site's most articulate and intelligent commentators, and if that's what's meant by "offensive", then we need more offense and provocation.
