| REVIEWER | REPLY |
 | SilverFox
(34)
09/29/2008 | Ummm, "divide and conquer"? Divide who? Conquer what? If you're trying to make a point, I'm afraid that was a swing and a miss. |
 | lmorovan
(19)
05/04/2008 | OK, give some time to guess or keep digging. I mean, I am blind here and those who can see refuse to help. |
 | magellan
(177)
05/04/2008 | nope, wrong again. |
| magellan
(177)
05/04/2008 | Hint: try reviewing "RateItAll." |
| lmorovan
(19)
05/04/2008 | Is "stay on topic" a rule for all or just a few? I see many, many reviews that have nothing to do with the topic.
Does RateItAll provide a channel to express myself or it is a secret that, if I am lucky, might be able to find it? Promise, as soon as I find it, I will take the review down and move it there. |
| magellan
(177)
05/04/2008 | Please try and stay on topic: this item is supposed to be a review of how "offensive" I am as a reviewer. Your review seems more about your inability to create a logical Weblist and your victimization. Can you please find a proper channel to express yourself? |
| magellan
(177)
05/04/2008 | Ridge, you're spot on. When a list doesn't make any sense in a rating context we manually put on "user page only status." |
| magellan
(177)
05/04/2008 | Thanks MPR, that works (at least it makes a bit more sense). I'll make the list public again. |
 | Ridgewalker
(64)
05/03/2008 | If I remember correctly (this has happened to me), when Lawrence considers a list to be unratable, he puts it into a mode where it can only be visited from the List-maker's User Page and reviews on the list don't make it to the recent reviews section. From fitman's comment, this seems to be the case. |
| lmorovan
(19)
05/03/2008 | Thanks MissPackRat. I made the changes you suggested and it's still not working. I'll just delete the fracking list and forget about it. But the problem, the BIG problem stands. |
 | fitman
(51)
05/03/2008 | I tried a test 'review' and it posted, but didn't show up on 'recent reviews'. Then I successfully rated the list ('5'). BTW, this is surely not the only list with meaningless meanings for the stars. |
| lmorovan
(19)
05/03/2008 | I deleted the whole list because I exhausted every possible changes to make it work. It didn't. I remade the whole list again and it was working good until about an hour ago. If the list is not ratable, then it cannot be rated. Yet there are at least 8 ratings on it. I have 9 other lists and they all work. Not this one. Bahhhh... why even bother. |
 | MissPackRat4Jesus
(42)
05/03/2008 | I'll make a stab at it, and see what happens.... |
| magellan
(177)
05/03/2008 | MPR, you seem to be on the site now... can you help him? I've tried but he doesn't want to hear it. |
| magellan
(177)
05/03/2008 | Can somebody please help our dramatic little friend to set up a rating scale that makes sense for this list? As it is now (and LM, I messaged you on this), the list is un-rate-able. For example, a 5 rating of "Very Important" is meaningless if I try and rate "I don't agree with God." |
