Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register

Genetically Modified Food

reviewed by Lena

Lena
06/16/2009

Genetically Modified Food 3

I'm a bit conflicted in terms of where I stand on GMO food itself, but I think it's an issue that is increasing in both import and ignorance thereof...quite a dangerous combination.

In an ideal world (like the one that exists in my brain), technology and genetic modification would be used towards the goal of alleviating famine and world hunger. Although daunting, this is not an impossible goal if tackled by major multi-national corporations.

Unfortunately, the objectives of the major players in this industry are not presently aligned with this humanitarian mission. Further, they have a vested interest in blocking any and all legislation that would enable consumers to make a choice here in the US and have succeeded in doing so up until this point. In avoiding any enforced labeling of GMO products, they neatly prevent the existence of a record that would enable further scrutiny in the future and protect themselves from liability.

Here are a few concerning ways that genetic modification is being used today:

To encourage the increased usage of pesticides and other chemicals
An example of this is Roundup Ready seed sold by Monsanto. Roundup Ready means that this herbicide can be used in quantities far greater than ever before because the crop itself is immune. Many fruits and vegetables have highly permeable skin which absorbs pesticides and other chemicals. An increase in the use of these toxic chemicals means that more of them make it into our systems when we ingest them.

To increase profits of seed producers at the expense of farmers
Historically speaking, farmers have sustained their businesses through reuse of seed from year to year and selling seed amongst each other. Seed producers are starting to block this in a few different ways. The most insidious method is through litigation of farmers and enforced destruction of seed stockpiles that they claim contain "unlicensed patented seed." A judge has ruled that it doesn't matter if this occurred as a result of trade among other farmers, natural cross-pollination or even the wind blowing unsecured seed from a truck as it drives by a farm, corporations have the right to seek damages from farmers if they determine that any percentage of the plants growing on their acreage happen to include the patented genes.

None of this is all that shocking when you consider the legal obligation of corporations to their shareholders...it's not about people, it's about this quarter's profits and today's bottom line, biodiversity and human health be damned. I have the utmost faith in innovation and the advancement of science and technology, but it's discouraging to see it used toward these ends and seemingly devoid of adequate research and oversight.

Fortunately for countries that are taking a more conservative approach, America will provide a more than adequate sample for the both effects of the food itself and the broader agricultural economy.

Add your vote! 4 Helpful / 0 Funny / 2 Agree / 0 Disagree
Showing 16 Comments
You must be logged in to comment. login now.
jedi58 commented 171 days ago.
wow what an amazing article there Lena! I'm impressed! :)


Lena commented 171 days ago.
thanks! Coming from the UK, you must hear a lot more about the GMO controversy than I think the average american does.

jedi58 commented 171 days ago.
probably not a great deal more, probably only a few times a year and the occasional documentary

Unfortunately there isn't enough long term research going into GM crops at the minute in my opinion - I totally agree with you that it's being used for the wrong reasons at the minute but even after it starts getting used for the right reasons they must not stop research there either.

Genetic Engineering is still a very young science and because of this we don't yet know what are the long term effects of altering the very nature of plants and what it may mean for crops, and for those who consume it. Could it weaken the immunity of crops? Who knows, but that is something scientists need to know for certain and them misappropriating their knowledge for profiteering farmers is not the way forward.

*rant over*

Lena commented 171 days ago.
Indeed. Another aspect that concerns many medical professionals is that often an antibiotic resistance "marker gene" is used as a way of determining whether or not gene transfer was successful.

The speculated consequences of this range from the destruction of healthy bacteria that naturally lives in our intestinal tract to resistance to antibiotics used to treat infection. Again...needs more research.

TRUNCH253 commented 170 days ago.
Lena, I think you may be a tad bit too, how you say, "intellectual" for this site. Your intelligence and ability to articulate it so well is indeed appreciated, but surely you're headed towards a much better (and higher paying) position pretty soon, I'd say. They're very much in need of, and in fact, Desperate for people like you out there. But I always love reading your comments. They don't ever waste my time or try my patience. Especially in comparison to so much of the other cr ...Oh never mind.

jedi58 commented 170 days ago.
I agree with Trunch253... you are incredibly clever :) it's refreshing for someone to know about multiple fields, it makes for more interesting conversations!

Lena commented 170 days ago.
LOL...thanks guys.

I'm surprised I've never wasted your time Trunch. I fail at being concise :P

TRUNCH253 commented 170 days ago.
And just exactly why would you be surprised at that?

Lena commented 170 days ago.
I waste my own time...heeh.

TRUNCH253 commented 170 days ago.
"Fail at being concise"? C'mon! But modesty is also appreciated (in addition to being somewhat scarce) on this site.

Lena commented 170 days ago.
Hah...I have my fair share of diatribes on here is all. I think I have a few "this is the longest review I've ever read" comments on my reviews too :P

jedi58 commented 170 days ago.
at least it shows that you're really thinking about the topics... sometimes an opinion cannot be conveyed in 140 characters ;)

TRUNCH253 commented 170 days ago.
Exactly!

Gris commented 170 days ago.
Very good Review Lena, Once again your intelligence is showing. ;-)
I do want to play Devils Advocate for a minute, though. Just because I am a Bastard.
You mentioned Pesticides, and their negative impact on our health. Organic foods eliminate the use of chemical fertilizers, hormones and pesticides. As of this moment in time there have not been a whole lot of research on the impact of Organic v. GMO's, and as you Pointed out, humans are the Guinea pigs in this unfortunate test. That said, there have been some Trends that are beginning to emerge.
Those damnable Pesticides that you mentioned earlier, may actually be there for a reason. Cancer rates have dropped 15% since farmers began using Pesticides. This is due in Part to people being able to afford more fruits and vegetables, because the Chemicals allow more to be grown. That's one reason the Average life expectancy in the US went up by almost 10 years between 1950 and 2000.
Additionally, organic farming uses A lot of Manure to fertilize crops. This leads to problems with Contamination. Although Organic produce only accounts for 1% of the food supply, it accounts for 8% of the E. coli cases in the U.S.
Also, The current acre of farmland produces 200 percent more wheat than it did 70 years ago. The same goes for meat and poultry. Ironically, this Is because of those damned chemicals. Eliminate them and you get less Food per Acre.
I am not trying to change your mind or anything, your Review was well Researched and you obviously know a whole Hell of a lot more about it than I do. But, I am at work now and Bored, so it seemed as good a time as any to be a Bastard. :-)

http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4019?popular=true
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15158675/
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus07.pdf#027
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15158675/http://www.msn bc.msn.com/id/15158675/


jedi58 commented 170 days ago.
The problem with the use of pesticide is in it's name - it kills pests. However annoying pests may be they play an important role in the ecosystem. If one link in a chain is removed then the ones above which feed on the pests will have to turn to alternate food sources, and those which the pests feed on will be in danger of overpopulation due to the removal or reducing of a natural predator (I use the term predator loosely as the bottom rungs of the ecosystem are of course plants).

The very nature of GMO I see as a problem also - we are causing a deliberate mutation to maximise output, however if we think about it mutations are not always beneficial (such as cancer, which I suppose is technically not the same thing as it is a number of damaged cells which have lost their function).

Okay I've forgotten what point I was trying to make with this comment so I'll leave it there. Oops

Gris commented 169 days ago.
Haha, fair enough Jedi, I go off on tangents and forget my points a lot too. ;-)
Showing 16 Comments
About This Reviewer
By the Numbers