Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register

Bil-Jac

reviewed by Natural-k9

Natural-k9
07/19/2009

Bil-Jac 1

Bil-Jac? Sure, I will give my two cents. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that as someone from within the pet food industry, there is a clear line drawn between natural or holistic foods and other foods.

To begin with, let me say that there are dogs that will do well on any food that a consumer can buy. Bil-Jac, Old Roy, Solid Gold, Eagle Pack or whatever.

There are also dogs that will suffer allergies and severe problems from the very same foods. There really is no "best" or only choice out there. It will depend on the dog and it's the responsibility of each owner to find what is best for their pet based on their research. It's a free market.

Now on to my perspective on Bil-Jac. I would never again buy or feed a product with corn, wheat or say it it. Period. Beyond that, the use of chemical preservatives like BHT is not something I would ever choose. I simply cannot for a moment base my choice on what the current research claims is "safe" and ok. BHT is not a natural preservative, therefore, not an option.

While we are talking about chemicals, by looking at soft treats from Bil-Jac is see Propylene Glycol and High Fructose Corn Syrup. There is no need for these at all nor would I even consider giving these to my pets.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has determined that propylene glycol in or on cat food has not been shown by adequate scientific data to be safe for use. If propylene glycol is used in or on cat food, the food is considered adulterated and in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

The feds can tell me that minor consumption wont hurt you but again, it's not natural and I choose to use products I know are natural.

My first experience with propylene glycol was many years ago as a aircraft ground person for a major air carrier. We know propylene glycol as the de-icing fluid we sprayed on the aircraft. It even has a MSDS published on it.

So is this something I want to feed to my pet or recommend to other pet owners. As for me the answer is NO.

Join to vote! 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree
Showing 3 Comments
You must be logged in to comment. login now.
Angela Vallera commented 129 days ago.

Hello,
We read with interest your post regarding dog food and proper nutrition.

As a member of the Bil-Jac communications team, we recognize that there is a considerable amount of conflicting information on the web regarding proper nutrition. Can I put you in touch with a member of the Bil-Jac animal nutrition team? Dr. Bingham, an animal nutritionist, frequently shares science-based information on this topic. If you’re interested, I can share a post, an interview or even an article covering this topic.

Please let me know how I can best assist. Feel free to email me (biljac@RMDadvertising.com) and I’ll help you get the information you need.
Thank you!

Angela Vallera

sheltervt commented 102 days ago.
Yes, because propaganda from the people profiting from low quality ingredients is SURE to clear the air!

rwharris311 commented 83 days ago.
I have alread added a post regarding Bil Jac but I though a comment attached to this post might be in order. People who use hysteria and twisted logic are not to be taken seriously. The writer of this post makes a comment that his experience with proplyene glycol was as an aircraft deicer. Yes, propylene glycol is used as a deicer because it lowers the freezing point of water, the same reason it is used in the manufacture of some brands of ice cream. He also points out, with horror dripping from his words, that "It has a MSDS", with the implication that something nasty enough to have a MSDS should NEVER be used in dog food. I will point out that good, old water, yep, H2O, has a MSDS published on it. Check out Chemical Abstracts Number (CAS) 7732-18-5, in an online MSDS search, and there it will be. The fact that this poster chooses to overlook is that a MSDS is frequently used, as in the case of water, to convey the information that a sustance is not harmful.
Showing 3 Comments
About This Reviewer
By the Numbers