Undertaker at one time, along with Kane, was one of the main reaosn that I watched WWE television. I just loved his mystique... the mysteriousness of his character. I started watching wrestling in 1997, and from then until 1999, he was one of the most interesting on WWE television. His feud with his long lost brother Kane was very, very well written and very, very well performed. And it brought on some good matches too. And let's not forget that he is the origional Innovater of the Hell in a Cell Match, the most brutal, intense match in WWE history. So why am I given him a 3. Well, I miss the real Undertaker. The WWE writing team has done a great job of taking his character and turning it into trash. They have sucked all of the interest and mysteriousness out of his character, so now he's just another "Big Man" with an attitude (same thing goes for Kane). He's cut his hair. Why? And if he is an "American Badass" and is no longer "The Prince of Darkness", then why is he called "The Undertaker". Do the WWE writers even know what that word means? If you're going to end the character, at least leave the name behind as well. I, like so many others, miss the Real Taker!
