Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register

Charles Dickens

reviewed by Moosekarloff

Charles Dickens (1812-1870) was born into a British family that knew its share of poverty and indebtedness. These personal experiences flavored much of Charles Dickens work as it relates ...
Read More

Moosekarloff
05/30/2003

Charles Dickens 1

This guy was a penny-a-word hack who spewed out maudlin, predictable, heavy-handed, poorly written crap that for some reason found an audience in its time and still appeals to those who are afraid to tackle writers of depth and inventiveness who challenge readers. His sole contribution to world literature was his depictions of down-and-out London of the late 19th century, but period pieces and local color don't rank very high on the scale of literary merit. I'm fairly surprised that people still read this clown.

Join to vote! 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree
Showing 1 Comment
You must be logged in to comment. login now.
Kelticman commented 1136 days ago.
I have just read Moosekarloff's review of Dickens. What utter half -baked ill considered nonsense, if I may say. For me, and countless others, Dickens is the finest novelist in the English language. His charcterisations and depiction of London's nineteenth century social underclass, coupled with the injustices and deprivations and injustices these people had to suffer; coupled with his understanding and the intricate workings of the human mind - interlaced with a brilliant sense of observation and unsurpassed humour (Pickwick Papers,anyone?) mark him out as the greatest novelist in English literature. Dickens addressed almost every aspect that makes us human beings such complex and interesting characters - and with a wisdom and style that remains unmatched.
Showing 1 Comment
About This Reviewer
By the Numbers