Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register

Islam

Recent Happenings

43 days ago

Humans, by nature, are social pack animals. As such, we have a tribal, or instinctive, need to follow a leader. This is the very basis of all civilization. In some societies, such as America, there is a legal system of checks and balances to keep power hungry elected officials from going too far. In countries that lack an official system of checks and balances, you can normally count on somebody to keep the truly power mad and despot leaders in line. These people are called assassins. We may have an instinctive need to follow a leader, but we don't like to be bullied.
Roughly translated, taqlid means to follow a mujtahid in religious laws. (A mujtahid is a juror who meets the qualifications laid by Abul Husayn al-Basri in the 11th century) Muslims believe that since the beginning of time, Allah has set out his divine law on the tongues of the prophets. Many of whom will sound familiar to the Jews and Christians by the way. Since Allah is the creator of the entire Universe, only he can make the laws. This understanding has served well for hundreds of years. But now people are asking questions.
It is now popular to strive to be independent and to think for oneself. This is not necessarily a bad thing, but it is a change from the previous conformist mindset. The fact that so few people actually are individual, seems to matter little to most. But that is beside the point. We are all followers at some point. And this is as it should be. When I was a student, I followed the instruction of professors. As a dog trainer, people follow my instruction on dog behavior. (I hope) If you want to fix cars, you obey the manuel. This is common sense to us. If you are a Christian or a Jew who wants to know G-ds law you read the Bible or the Talmud and you learn from your preachers and rabbi's.
To draw from the advice of others is not only common sense, it is Islamic law. The Qur'an instructs us to "Question the people of remembrance if you do not know." (21:7) The controversy comes from today's independent mindset. We tend to question everything. We have trouble putting our blind faith in a jurist. We prefer to put our blind faith in reason. To be sure, the qualifications to be a mujtahid are strict. (If anyone cares what they are, let me know and I'll post them) And they should be in the Qur'an it says "Of every group of them, a party only should go forth [for jihad] so that [among those who are left behind there should be some] who should [undertake to] gain knowledge in religion, in order for them to warn their people when they consult them, so that they take heed to themselves." [9:122]
A person `who undertakes to gain knowledge in religion' is responsible for putting Muslims on their guard by warning them about their obligations, whether religious or moral. Thusly, whether a Muslim makes the commitment to follow his legal decisions or not, the Qur'an requires this educated person to issue legal decisions and to warn believers about fulfilling their obligations. When there is such a learned person in the community then it is expected to refer to him on religious issues.
Once again, we see a problem with the original law meshing with today's society. Modern Muslims rarely refer to a mujtahid. People are questioning how relevant the taqlid is in today's society. As people are increasingly putting their faith outside of the church mujtahid are going to have to find ways to reach Muslims outside their traditional roles. They are must adapt or face extinction.

votes 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

122 days ago

During the days prior to Gulf War II, I had a drinking game going on with a friend. We would watch CNN and every time some commentator used the word 'Jihad' incorectly we would take a drink. Related games included drinking everytime some asshat with no real understanding of religion would wax intellectual about the nuances of the world's second largest religion.
A jihad is something that Muslims deal with everyday. A greater jihad is a struggle against temptation. A struggle to get one's self right with Allah. It is an on going process that only ends when you die.
A lesser jihad concerns getting others right with Allah. For some, this has meant war. But one must take care to follow all the rules of war as outlined in the Q'uran.
* Do not betray any agreements you have entered into
* Do not plunder
* Do not commit injustices or use torture
* Do not touch the children, the womenfolk, the elderly, or other non-combatants of the enemy
* Do not destroy fruit-trees and tilled lands
* Even in warfare, Islam is ready to make peace and treaty with the opposing side.
* A Muslim government remains faithful to any treaty it has made until the end of its term.
* If the opposing side betrays the agreement, The Muslim government must publicly and officially declare to the other side that the agreement is no longer valid. Even though it can declare war as soon as the agreement loses its validity, it should grant them a respite to make a new evaluation.
* If the opposing side continues their hostilities and do not change their attitude even after the end of the term granted, this means that a state of war has begun.
* In order to force the enemy to cease hostilities or to defeat them in war, the Muslims must be powerful and remain steadfast. However, the Muslims must always observe the rules of war mentioned above.
* When the enemy side is inclined toward peace and making a treaty, the Muslims should also be inclined this way. They should also give asylum to those who seek it and, without harming in any way the wealth or persons of the asylum seekers, covey them to their place of safety.
* Do not kill livestock
* Treat with respect the religious persons who live in hermitages or convents and spare their edifices (Ibn al-Athir, al-Kami fi al-Tarikh, Vol.3, p.227)


For the record, al-Qaeda has broken most of those rules.

For those interested, the best jihad can be found here:
http://www.jihad.net/
votes 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

129 days ago

Great list item, Numbah, thanks.
In the West in the last century, there have been drastic changes to our cultural and religious landscape. Depending on who you ask; Christianity is either being persecuted or Christians are busy persecuting. Both sides feel that they are the victim. In the past 100 years the west has seen Christianity dominate both the political and social landscape and then slide back into the churches. In this country we have religious freedom, this freedom encompasses mainstream religions, alternate religions and cults. We are a country run by secular law, and this is a good thing, as countries run by theocratic laws tend to have a lot of social and civil problems.
Many Muslims that come to this country find themselves caught between religious freedom and past opression. This is something they must come to terms with themselves, many choose our freedoms, but still hold on to vestiges of their previous life, customs or religious practices. (though, for the record, I have yet to meet a Muslim who doesn't drink. )
America, for better or for worse, is a very influential country, we have media which pervades every country (someone tell me what sitcoms they have in Tunisia, for example), we have theoretically, lots of money and we have a big-ass army. Our influence on other countries is stronger than we realize. Our values are seeping into many countries in the Middle East. Change can be a scary thing for many. They see our acceptance of sex, both heterosexual and homosexual, our acceptance of alcohol and womens roles in society. Among other things. Its what they choose to do with that information that causes conflict.
I specified the Middle East because they seem to be having a hard time with weternization. In reality Mid-Easterners only make up a small fraction of Muslims world wide. The problems between the West and Islam are ideological, therefore, no easy answer exists. But as the world continues to shrink Muslims have to make a choice, they can sink or they can swim. They can adapt to the ever changing world as some Christians and some Jews have done or they can cling to their beliefs. However, they must realize that holding fastly and stubbornly to their beliefs they will need to completely shut out the rest of the changing world. Now I am not saying they need to abandon their religious customs, they can adapt many of those to the changing landscape, but they can not hold on to their political ideals and expect to impact the rest of the world on a global scale. (Again, I want to specify Muslims in the Mid-East, which is less than 20% of the Muslim population)
I also feel the need to point out, for the sake of balance, that in the Western world Christians have adapted, but many lost much of their religious identity. Many Christians know little about Christian theology. Muslims see this as well.
Is there a way to adapt to the secular world without losing ones religious ideology?
votes 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

131 days ago

Culture clash, anyone? I think most of the friction in Islam can be attributed to resistance to westernization, and while this might break the older generation's hearts, your kids muck around on the internet and party like the infidels when nobody is watching. Whether or not Islam takes this well will say alot about the direction they are moving in.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

131 days ago

Not a bad Korn tune...
votes 1 Helpful / 2 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

131 days ago

Has the Mid-East evolved yet?
votes 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

131 days ago

I don't speak here about science specifically and I don't speak here for the entire Islamic World, only the Arab countries. I would not be surprised, however, if this statistic would not apply broadly to the entire world.

I speak of translating books. I paraphrase from a 2002 U.N. study. In the entire Arab world, about 350 books are translated each year into Arabic. That is the same number as say Estonia. Over the last one thousand years, about 100, 000 works have been translated into Arabic. That is the same number that Spain does in ONE year. Islam is a stifling, suffocating and barren creed.

votes 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 3 Agree / 0 Disagree

132 days ago

Traditionally, in the religious world, views on homosexuality fall into two camps. Liberal adherents who tolerate homosexuality and Conservative members who do not. Typically this has more to do with politics and less to do with religion, but rest assured, both camps back up their claims with scripture. Because of this you will hear similar arguments from both Christians and Muslims for or against homosexuality. Generally, liberal Muslims will use scientific findings to back their claims that homosexuality is normal for some adults and is not a sin
Generally, conservatives stress tradition as proof that homosexuality is a sinful, ungodly crime. Where any given Muslim lives will determine their position on homosexuality more than any other factor. As Numbah helpfully pointed out; there are supposedly no gays in Iran. In fact, is some countries homosexuality is a crime punishable by death. Iran, Afghanistan, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Yemen, and Sudan.
In the description of this list item I left the verses in the Q'uran that deal specifically with homosexuality. I did not write them out because I am feeling very lazy, but a google search will clear them up. :)
Many of those verses are similar to the Hebrew/Christian story of Lot, refered to here as Lut. One major difference though is that in the Hebrew Scriptures, the destruction of Sodom is due to attempted rape, persecution of widows, orphans and children (in surrounding verses). In the Q'uran there is no mention of the rape or persecution of the less fortunate. God destroyed Sodom because of the citizens bisexuality.

Islamic theologians consider homosexuality to be a punishable offense, in many cases, punishable by death. Opinions differ, however among the lay observers of Islam, especially in the West.
votes 5 Helpful / 0 Funny / 2 Agree / 0 Disagree

132 days ago

When you consider that there are supposedly no homosexuals in Iran, I'd call it an uphill battle.
votes 3 Helpful / 1 Funny / 2 Agree / 0 Disagree

132 days ago

Traditionally, when bad things happened in the natural world it was because God was angry and punishing us for some grievous sin. (Just ask Jerry Falwell.) However, there is much evidence to suggest that Allah works in mysterious ways. Mankind has a nasty tendancy to turn his back on various God(s) until calamity strikes. It could well be that Bad things happen to bring one closer to God. Or maybe bad things happen because God is showing us his power. Or maybe bad things happen because life is a bitch. In my experience trying to figure out the will of Allah only leads to headache and heartbreak. Try not to dig too deep.
votes 2 Helpful / 1 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

View Next Subject: Judaism

Top Islam Reviewers