Macallan (12 year)

Approval Rate: 93%

93%Approval ratio

Reviews 26

Sort by:
  • by

    wabdatl

    Sun Dec 27 2009

    Smooth as silk without decoration. A romantic comedy of a scotch. Enjoyable. No depth but sometimes who needs depth. You come in from the cold; a welcoming hug from a ski bunny. What's wrong with a ski bunny?

  • by

    rkhunter

    Wed Sep 30 2009

    A nice multi cask single malt Scotch that is common in most bars. Cant go wrong with a Macallan

  • by

    mannacler

    Tue Sep 08 2009

    A great whiskey but confine yourself to four ounces or less. It gives a vicious hangover and your bathroom will smell like a peat bog.

  • by

    rocketjs

    Mon Aug 03 2009

    Very, very, very good! One word to sum up the Macallan 12 is smoooooooth! I would say that this is a sophisticated scotch for a 12 y.o. Many different flavours combine without one overpowering another. Can be easily sipped neat or with a splash of water is delicious. The 18 is a true classic, but for the money the 12 y.o. is a must. Not my absolute favorite, as Lagavulin 16 has me hooked, but depending on my mood... This would be a great place to start for a novice scotch drinker.

  • by

    petr479a

    Thu Dec 18 2008

    Very good,clear smooth and a little smokey taste,a real pure single malt whisky. In my opinion the price is fair 100%. I will give 4 and not 5, only because i prefer more full body malts.

  • by

    bdines

    Thu Oct 16 2008

    I'm not sure how Macallan does it, but the universe of flavours found in this whisky is amazing. To me it's on a different planet compared to some of the other whiskies I like (Dalmore, Highland Park, Laphraoig, etc.) Too bad is price is so much higher.

  • by

    cmdrmack

    Tue Apr 29 2008

    While I generally like a good peaty scotch, the Sherry Cask Macallan provides a completely different range of flavors, all of which are excellent.

  • by

    larz1c42

    Sun Feb 24 2008

    A good friend introduced me to Macallan a few years ago.  I enjoyed it enough to go back for more, but I can only give it a 4 as I have had better.  It is clean and crisp on the nose and the pallet, but lacks some of the depth and richness I prefer.

  • by

    zuchinibut

    Sun Feb 03 2008

    I loved it. Macallan's 12 year has a great flavor and has a very smooth finish. My wife usually detests anything whisky, but I managed to get her to try it and actually enjoy it.

  • by

    jhelms2196

    Tue Jan 29 2008

    This is a really good scotch and even better at this price.

  • by

    imjollymon

    Tue Jan 29 2008

    By far the finest scotch on earth. Wow is all I can say!

  • by

    fb570048324

    Mon Nov 05 2007

    It's alright, but I'd recommend upgrading to cask strength if going with The Macallan

  • by

    lumbreek

    Sat Aug 18 2007

    For the money, this is my favourite Whisky, unlike most whiskies, The Macallan has a good start, middle and end, lots of flavour, full bodied, a bit of burn and a warming finish. Other Whiskies in this price arena may beat The Macallan in one area, but The Macallan for me always wins overall. It takes a more expensive Whisky to beat The Macallan 12yo Sherry Cask. My benchmark.

  • by

    genghisthehun

    Sat Jul 14 2007

    This is one of the classic single malts. I can usually find this in a bar so that is another mark in its favor. If I can't think of what to drink, I order this brand. It is tame enough for women who want to try something different than the usual Cosmopolitan or other such junk.

  • by

    notbadnotbad

    Sat Jul 14 2007

    There are two Macallan 12 Years, a fact that seems to be skipped over by the other reviewers. One is the "Fine Oak" single malt, which is a delicate, complex Highland style which has a medium body and mostly vanilla notes. The other is the Sherry Oak single malt, which is a richer, darker scotch that has more of a fruit, spice and ginger nose. Both are among the best scotches in this price range and well worth the investment.

  • by

    uksqueeze

    Sun May 27 2007

    Tasty, but at a similar price, you're better off with the Highland Park 12 or one of the Glenlivets.

  • by

    bobatcomicdotc_om

    Fri May 25 2007

    The standard. Always solid if not spectacular. Sweet sherry flavors with a slight spice and nut finish.

  • by

    pugwash01

    Fri May 25 2007

    A smooth whisky that in my opinion is up there with the best!! But then again having Scottish blood in me, you will know that no other whiskeys compare. (Although I will always give them a try!!!) One thing to notice about Scottish whisky is, the word whisky is spelt differently. (Whisky-Scotland and Whiskey-other countries.) Try looking the next time you go to a liquor store!! My favorite is Glenfiddich, a wonderful single malt whisky. (but thats me!!!LOL)

  • by

    boiler01

    Fri Apr 20 2007

    I think this is an okay scotch, but I actually prefer both the Balvenie 10 year and the Glenlivet 15 year to this.  Maybe it will grow on me.

  • by

    10bucks

    Sat Feb 11 2006

    The smoothest of the scotches that I have tasted so far...

  • by

    zivojinovich

    Fri Nov 05 2004

    Greatest tasting Scotch with a hint of Oak flavor. Delicious!

  • by

    gl_hume

    Fri Nov 05 2004

    When you drink this wisky you will know were the extra money went. A CLASSIC 12yr. in its own right and a great entry-level-model for the Macallen name.

  • by

    dragon_5

    Fri Aug 08 2003

    The sherry-oak casks really set this scotch apart from the others. This is among the very best single malts and far superior to the blended whiskies.

  • by

    jmputz

    Sat Jun 14 2003

    I agree that there are better versions of this classic whisky, but how could one give another rating than 5 for one of the best whiskies. If a Johnny Walker Red Label gets a 1, how could anybody reasonably giver somethin else than a 5 for this excellent Speyside malt?

  • by

    dane70bb

    Mon Apr 21 2003

    Any serious Scotch Drinker would prefer the 18 year old version. For some reason I prefer the 10 year old version to the 12, but the 12 is okay.

  • by

    sluigij

    Mon Feb 10 2003

    Not as good as the 18 year old version, but an excellent substitute at a more friendly price.

This topic is on the following list(s)

Add to new list