Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register
view all 21 topics
Save your customized feed by joining RateItAll today!

right now

3 hours ago

Its a ok book gives a lot of information but not recommended for people who don't know what they are doing with auto parts.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

20 hours ago

Ross Thomas had several interesting careers that he mined for background in his writing. He served in the Philippines in the Second World War and worked as public relations specialist, reporter, union spokesman, and political strategist before becoming a writer. His work often deals with the machinations of political intrigue, and frequently in a sardonic, and even surreal manner.

This book isn't among his strongest works, but its a decent read. The narrative is told from the viewpoint of a researcher for a muck-raking columnist, assigned to dig up background on the resignation of an apparently corrupt U.S. Senator. An intriguing, although occasionally contrived story, and told with Thomas' tongue wedged firmly in his cheek.
votes 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 1 Disagree

21 hours ago

I may be mistaken, but I believe he's a Hindu, and not a particularly devout one at that, not a Muslim. He has certainly written about Islam and related subjects, and frequently in a highly critical manner. I'm not sure exactly what the definition of Islam Author is according to the list, but I regard Naipaul as one of the finest living English prose stylists, regardless of his religion.
votes 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 1 Disagree

yesterday

I Rate the Book a 4 but the car a 1 because these cars are just junk and you need this book all the time to fix the problems like Gaskets, Water pumps and More.
The Book will way out last the car.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

2 days ago

Burke moves the scene from the familiar Louisiana parish of New Iberia to western Montana for this novel. Dave Robicheaux, his deeply troubled and fatally flawed protagonist and Clete Purcel, his human train wreck of a companion, become embroiled in complex web of deceit as ancient ghosts come back to visit.

Like many of Burke's Robicheaux novels, it explores the themes of corrupted wealth, and moral vacuity. Unlike many of the novels in the series, it tells a significant part of the tale from other viewpoints than that of Robicheaux, which gives it an unusual feeling for those familiar with the series. Burke is a very good writer, and isn't afraid to step outside of formula, either that of the genre he writes, nor his own. While this is not the strongest of his novels, its damn good and well worth the read. I would not, however, recommend it as place to strart reading Burke.
votes 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

4 days ago

*Don't worry, no spoilers here

I finished reading this book yesterday but wanted to give it time to sink in. It is undeniably Auster, his use of language is second to none as he weaves a tale about Adam Walker and an event and person that haunt him throughout his days. The characters are wonderfully described and their interactions are told exquisitely, just as one would expect from Auster. The reason I couldn't give it five stars was because I didn't feel it was as good as "The New York Trilogy", which remains to this day one of the best pieces of literature I have ever read. It is still a great novel (especially compared to the drivel that is released these days) and worth the read, and I will undoubtedly reread it in the coming months and look forward to the next Auster novel.
votes 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

4 days ago

More of a cartoonist than a writer, Feiffer is nonetheless an intriguing and important American voice. Most famous for his long running cartoons in the Village Voice, which have been collected several times, and display a highly literate, sardonic and even cynical view of American society, he has also written several plays and screenplays.

His cartoons, which began in the Eisenhower era, were ascerbic commentaries on the society and political environment that Feiffer observed, and he skewered the politicians and mores of both the left and right. Together with Walt Kelly, whose career preceded and overlapped his, they turned the comic strip into a vehicle for social and political commentary not only with wit and humor, but with literate sardonicism.
votes 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

5 days ago

Paul Auster does not write for the masses (insert 90% of authors), he does not write ridiculously horrible science fantasy about wizards or vampires (Rowling, Meyer), and he does not write with an overtly christian basis (Eliot). But he does write for those seeking the unconventional, the memorable, and the intricate. Perhaps that is why he has been called "the writer's writer". His amazing use of the English language to weave his mysterious and deceptive tales always leave me thinking of them long after I have closed the book. I respect Auster as an author as much as any contemporary writer, and that is why I look forward to every new book he writes.
votes 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

5 days ago

Terry Brooks couldn't write a shopping list. But he can steal a narrative like a hot damn. Tolkein's corpse is still wondering where its wallet went.
votes 2 Helpful / 1 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

5 days ago

votes 2 Helpful / 2 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

5 days ago

A complex, apocalypytic tale of despair that blends the best of hardboiled crime writing with science fiction. A truly excellent work from a guy who is arguably the best writer in the history of the genre, and one of the top twenty (at least) American writers of the 20th century.
votes 6 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

5 days ago

Only for serious Tolkein junkies. Written in a style that rivals the minutes of the Second Lateran Council for turgid prose, it does a remarkably dull job of telling the back story to The Lord of the Rings.
votes 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

5 days ago

A reasonably interesting novel that largely manages to overcome its faintly ridiculous premise, and doesn't get too far down the anthopomorphising trail.

Its worth reading, but Adams has written far better books. (Plague Dogs or Shardik for example)
votes 5 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

6 days ago

I'm glad to see that RIA has categorized this egregious nonsense as Fiction, which it clearly is, although I dispute the categorization as Literature.

Sitchin, who is a galaxy class nutbar, believes every word of this balderdash, and has managed to convince others of his lunacy, some of whom can be found reviewing this item with purple prose. Essentially, this is more of that Planet X/Nibiru hogwash which has blended with the Mayan Calendar fanatics, dragged in some Atlantean theory, added a dash of Edgar Cayce and the Book of Revelations and come up with a real hell-bender of a fairy tale. Good for a laugh, providing you lubricate your synapses with sufficient alcohol.
votes 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

7 days ago

Thanks for the information - the 'Beat Generation' were in my thoughts back in Uni days. Kerouac was inspirational to me, in that, after reading his story I decided to find an education, stop the booze and live a life away from the road. regards Dape
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

7 days ago

I don't know about you, but I'm a little sceptical of the scientific validity of a book written by a guy who has written a few "instant" books to cash in on trends in the past. As one example Joseph wrote "Strawberry Fields Forever, John Lennon Remembered" which was written the week after Lennon's murder and rushed into print. I read the first twenty pages of this in a bookstore, recognized apocalypse porn when I saw it, and put it back on the shelf.
votes 3 Helpful / 1 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

7 days ago

This collaboration by legendary Beat writers Jack Kerouac and William S. Burroughs sat unpublished for over sixty years after being written.

Not to be unduly cruel, but if had failed to see print for a further six decades, the literary world would have been no poorer. The book was written over a decade before the two authors published anything, and a dispassionate observer will easily understand why it was rejected by publishers in 1945. Not because it is shocking or avante-garde, because it is neither, but because it really isn't very good.

Burroughs and Kerouac write (mostly) alternating first person chapters from two disparate but essentially similar viewpoints. The narrators are thinly disguised versions of themselves and all of the primary characters are based on their friends and associates at the time. The plot entails the pursuit of a young and sexually ambivalent man by his sometime mentor, older and openly homosexual, and is based on the real murder of Walter Kammerer by Lucien Carr in 1944.

Carr, then 19, stabbed the 33 year old Kammerer during a drunken quarrel then tied his arms together, weighted his pockets with rocks and rolled him into the Hudson river to drown. He admitted the killing to Kerouac, Burroughs and others before surrendering to the police. He was convicted of first degree manslaughter, served two years in prison, and on his release began working for United Press International, eventually becoming one of the most respected newsmen and editors of that organization. It was his death from natural causes that allowed the publication of the book by the Kerouac estate (Kerouac and Burroughs had promised Carr some time in the sixties that they wouldn't attempt to publish it until his death)

The book had acquired something of a legendary status before its publication, primarily because the two authors talked about it frequently, and it was assumed that any collaboration between two innovative and influential literary stylists at the beginning of their careers would be something special. Unfortunately, its not. This has nothing of Burroughs wonderful manipulation of the language that we see in "Junky" or "Naked Lunch" and while Kerouac's sections are a little more familiar to those who have read "Desolation Angels" or "The Dharma Bums" they are lacking the fullness that his later work acquires.

This is worth reading for its literary historical import, which frankly is somewhat slight, but not for much else.
votes 3 Helpful / 1 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

8 days ago

Tuchman's book on the first month of the First World War is a fine piece of writing, and a solid history of the opening stanzas of a terrible conflict. She is eminently readable, without being trite, which is the pitfall that ensnares many popular historians.

My one quibble with the book is that it is somewhat scanty on the details of the geo-political situation leading up to the war, particularly that prior to the murder of Ferdinand. It's a minor quibble, and probably unavoidable for the kind of work Tuchman was aiming at, since a proper discussion of that situation would (and has) fill several volumes.

votes 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

8 days ago

Loved this book. Very original. Laughs on almost every page.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

8 days ago

Comedy Classic. Will live forever. Hilarious!
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree
Save your customized feed by joining RateItAll today!