Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register
view all 21 topics
Save your customized feed by joining RateItAll today!

right now

18 days ago

It is fine for vacation videos, and family things. But definately not a good quality for homemade "movies" the movies my kids make with the Kodak Digital camera (Quick time) is a better quality. After upgrading to Windows Vista, I can not use the usb to transfer to the computer. I Bought a firewire and it still won't transfer. So if are using XP this is fine, if you are using Vista or higher DON"t buy this.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

32 days ago

We've been using this paper with a Canon Pixma MP600 with outstanding results - as long as we use Canon ink. Had issues using non-OEM ink. Got it at a 2 for 1, so this represented good value as well. Very happy with the purchase and with Prime shipping, as always.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

35 days ago

This is great paper for the cost. I had a bit of a hard time adjusting my printer settings using iPhoto but Aperture 2 did a great job with detailing exact photo resolution. I would recommend this to anybody that has good quality pictures (at least 8MP) that would like to print them out.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

38 days ago

This was my MIL gift at my wedding rehearsal. She loved the pictures, she put it on her mantel. Very cute and creative gift!
votes 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

38 days ago

I used some Fuji Film brand glossy photo paper before I used these, and they turned out a bit reddish looking. When I printed using this paper, the pictures turned out with slightly less color, but very close to the original (note: I was scanning the originals first, so I assume that the minimal amount of color that was lost was done in the scanning process). That said, I got none of the reddish tinge that was there when using the Fuji brand. I imagine that my final result would be significantly closer to the original copy if I had been able to start with a digital image.

I think it is wise to use the brand of photo paper designed for that specific printer; it seems to have certainly helped the color out immensely in my situation, and I was very pleased with the end result as the pictures on this paper were very nice.

The paper is also quite thick and glossy. It would be hard to tell these weren't professionally printed.

The price on Amazon is significantly lower than that at my local Staples, so buying these here is a no brainer.

votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

48 days ago

This product is pretty cheap and so it the quality. At least they are a pretty basic design. We've only used a couple of the frames.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

52 days ago

The frame/coasters are as they look in the picture. I purchased 5 to make gifts for friends and some of them had marks on the wood (holder) part. Overall, they looked very nice and the girls loved them but I wish the holders were a bit more high quality.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

53 days ago

This is the second Cannon IXUS model that I have purchased and as before I have been impressed. Picture quality is excellent even when using the digital zoom although a stand is recommended, particularly in poor light. One of the things that make these cameras so attractive is the ease of use, along with a range of camera modes which allow even novices to take good photos in range of environments.

I have had the camera for almost 2 years now and it still works well with no signs of drop in performance. The cameras look is stylish with no visible signs of scratches despite its frequent use.
The only drawbacks are the cost which is still relatively expensive compared with other models currently out there with the same specification and the size which is quite chunky. Also the memory card provided is virtually worthless due to its size, however with the cost of SD cards this is not a significant problem.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

56 days ago

NOW ALL YOU CAN SAY ABOUT THIS PAPER IS WOWOWOW BEAUTIFUL PHOTOS. WE USE A PIXMA IP6000D PHOTO PRINTER FROM CANON AND WITH THIS PAPER WE HAVE MADE SOME BEAUTIFUL WEDDING PHOTOS FOR SOME COUPLES IN OUR AREA. WE ARE VERY PLEASED WITH THIS PRODUCT, AND WILL BUY IT AGAIN.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

56 days ago

WELL I MUST SAY I AM VERY PLEASED WITH THIS PAPER AND BUY IT OFTEN. WE DO SOME WEDDINGS AND WE USE THIS PAPER FOR MOST ALL OUR PRINTS. THE QUALITY IS VERY EXCEPTABLE, THE PRICE IS IN KEEPING WITH MOST PEOPLES BUDGET ALLOWING US TO GIVE THEM AN AMAZEING PHOTO ALBUM WITH MOSTLY ALL 8X10 PICTURES INSTEAD OF THE USUAL 4X6. WE ALSO DO 4X6 BUT WE USE THE PHOTO GLOSSY II PHOTO PAPER SO THE NEWLY WED COUPLE CAN FILL UP THEIR PHOTO ALBUMS WITH THE 4X6 SLOTS. WE WILL CONTINUE TO BUY THIS PAPER.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

56 days ago

It took the D700 to finally pry my old Nikon F5 film camera out of my hands.


With the prices of top end equipment today, I don't know how a young "photog" can even get started, but this D700 is quite a piece of equipment. Nikon is pretty good about making bodies that are compatible with their older lenses and thankfully, I already had a bagful of Nikon glass. Nevertheless, I still dropped $3,500 for the body and SB900 flash.


Together with a Macbook Pro, I'm getting some great stuff from this new body (and I don't miss the endless hours in the darkroom or outside lab expenses). Obviously, anyone who jumps from film to top end digital will be amazed at the speed, versatility and creative ability of a body like the D700, but I spent nearly two years looking at Nikon bodies, so I knew what to expect. I love the FX format, but the D3x at 8 grand was never a serious consideration for me. The 24 megapix and a few other bells and whistles couldn't make that sale to a working man.


I've been through the book twice and frequently reference the Magic Lantern book as well, but I'll be another year or two playing catch-up to the digital world. I am enjoying the journey.


kozmo
votes 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

57 days ago

I read the two other reviews on the product and after pricing it elsewhere, decided to take a chance. The three pic frame arrived and from what I can see without opening it, is undamaged. Though minimally packed it seems the box was sufficient sealed. Now the second 6 pic trapeze was an absolute joke. The idiots put it glass down in the box with just the extreme minimal packing, then put all the rest of the protective packing on top! The box it came in was barely sealed and had gaping opens where the tape and box should have met. A 5 year old child or drug addict could have done better!!!!

Amazon is good on taking it on the chin but still I must wait another week to replace this. I'll let you know how the rest goes...LOL Took pics but dont think they will let me load them here.

votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

57 days ago

Pleased with the product, the vendor, the price...

BUT, THE PACKAGING WAS NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO PREVENT THE PHOTO PAPER PACKAGE FROM BENDING.

PERHAPS NEEDS A STRONG CARDBOARD LINER
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

59 days ago

I think it is time Kodak got a fair review on this product. I decided to take a gamble on it even knowing it probably wouldn't meet my expectations. Upfront: If you are looking for photo quality prints, do not buy this paper. Use Kodaks star rating system that they provide for a reason and purchase 4 or 5 star paper. Personally I am quite happy with the quality prints of their 4 Star Premium Paper, At least in the 4x6 size I feel it is photo quality, or at least very very close to it. I couldn't tell a difference between the 4 star, and the 5 star Ultra Premium paper. (haven't printed an 8x10 yet, will update this if my opinion changes after doing so) so unless you are trying to sell prints, go for the 4 star. You will not be disappointed.

Now back to the 3 star. The print quality is slightly better than the paper I found at my local dollar store. Keep this in mind before purchasing. Color photos it does not produce. It would be great for scrapbooking, or other arts and crafts that you want to be better than just paper prints. Could also be very useful for flyers or post cards. I am not completely disappointed though. Black and white prints turn out just fine in my eyes.

Bottom line, you get what you pay for, and I commend Kodak for being upfront about it with a rating system. I am not supposed to mention prices, but lets see if they will let me do this. I paid just a little more for half the sheets of the 4 star Premium paper (Kodak Glossy Premium Photo Paper, 8.5 x 11 Inches, 50 Sheets per Pack (8360513))and it is worth the extra money.

FYI: I am using the Kodak ESP 5 All In One Printer.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

67 days ago

This paper works very well for my photo printing needs. I've used it with my Canon PIXMA MX860 Wireless All-In-One Photo Printer, and I'm very happy with it. A few sample sheets of this kind came with my Pixma and I was impressed enough by the results to order more. I've also tried the slightly less expensive normal glossy paper, which I'm also very happy with. This "super glossy" paper is a bit more glossy, and sometimes I prefer that.

One thing I really appreciate about this paper is that while one side is glossy, the other is basically like card stock, so you can write notes on the back of photos, or you can fold your photos to use them as cards. This is good quality paper, for a very good price. I'm very happy with this, in the 4 x 6 and other sizes. It covers all of my home photo printing needs.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

67 days ago

This paper works very well for my photo printing needs. I've used it with my Canon PIXMA MX860 Wireless All-In-One Photo Printer, and I'm very happy with it. It's not quite as glossy as the Canon Photo Paper Plus Glossy II, 4 x 6 Inches, 100 Sheets (2311B023), but it works quite well for what I need.

One thing I really appreciate about this paper is that while one side is glossy, the other is basically like card stock, so you can write notes on the back of photos, or you can fold your photos to use them as cards. This is good quality paper, for a very good price. I'm very happy with this, in the 4 x 6 and other sizes. It covers all of my home photo printing needs.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

70 days ago

I'm no expert, but it seems to work just fine. I love Canon printers also.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

72 days ago

After reading the reviews comparing the 2 papers, I purchased this paper Canon Photo Paper Pro II 4" x 6" (100 Sheets) (2737B012)to compare it to HP's Premium Photo Paper. I used an HP Photosmart 475 with an HP 97 ink cartridge to produce all prints in the comparison. Bottom line: I found no appreciable difference between the 2 papers in terms of resolution, color saturation, or brilliance. The Canon paper is slightly glossier and I don't have to deal with the end tab. Both are good enough for me so I'll take the best deal!
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

73 days ago

I cannot compare the Canon Glossy Photo Paper with any other brands as I've not used any other brands. But I have a Canon Pixma MP160 printer and all I can say is that the printer, the Canon Ink and paper produce excellent pictures very reminiscent of my days of youth in taking the Kodak film to the drugstore to be developed and then returning home with keepsake memories. Follow the instructions on the box and for the printer and you will get excellent pictures.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

78 days ago

My fiance and I went to Hawaii to get married. We went snorkeling almost everyday and this camera was a hit. We joked about getting another so we wouldn't have to take turns. I'm a botanist and I take a lot of close ups. I love the automatic macro which saves me from having to press another button. All buttons are easy for me. We took 3000 photos in 13 days. Movies are really nice. Great photos both above and underwater. Our photos came out way better than those I saw in the reviews before I bought it. Not one problem since I bought it in June 2009.
votes 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree
Save your customized feed by joining RateItAll today!