I believe that everybody has a right to opinions and beliefs - but not logic or facts. If a belief is passed off as fact erroneously, I will challenge it (i.e - that 'evolution' conversation I had with the long-gone (ironically) Goneaway some years back).
Do I view reviewers who don't compromise their beliefs as 'hated' or 'controversial'? Not really, explaining the two. At worst (if they're blatantly wrong about something), I find them to be merely irksome.