Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register
Watchmen is a 2009 film adaptation of Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons' comic book limited series Watchmen, ...
Read More
Added on 08/07/2008
RSS Icon

11 Reviews

northbynorthwe st
10/29/2009

Watchmen 4

Loved it in the theater but sadly just not the same at home. Ok I don't have the best entertainment system in town but still, after seeing it again recently I still think it's a bad ass movie but could have been a little better. And how come the blue guy, Dr. Manhattan, can't turn himself into a different color and a more normal body, say his old self? He seems to be able to do just about anything else!

Add your vote! 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

CanadaSucks
08/31/2009

Watchmen 3

Uneven. . . but I give it points for originality. Perhaps too faithful to the source material, "The Watchmen" takes itself very seriously but then gives us an aged Richard Nixon with a putty-Shylock nose that undermines other clever effects. And I got the point- the glowing blue man is nude and the camera is going to show his blue cock. . .got it. . .mr. director, I get it. . .you can stop showing me the blue sword now. . .I get it. . .I know you're trying to make a point about sexuality, but feel free to take that blue dick off the screen aaaaaannnnytime now. . .

Acting was uneven. I enjoyed Jackie Earle Haley. . but that insert-hot-girl simply couldn't act dead if shot. I can say I'm glad I watched this movie- but it's overblown by its fans and not really worthy of a second look. What a shame, really. . .

Add your vote! 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

mazeeeka
08/23/2009

Watchmen 3

I'm a big Alan Moore fan. I re-read Watchmen right before the movie came out and, yet, I lowered my expectations. Even with the lowered expectations, Zack Snyder seemed to do little with the material. It is as if he just pasted the comic in the pre-production room and said, "We don't need a script or a storyboard". The film doesn't create the swirling mass of humanity that crushes against individuality...IMHO, a very important element for the Watchmen's development and banishment. Zack leaves out so much of the contextualization that I wonder if he really understands anything of the historical back drop the comic was set against? I do understand after the studio's success with "300" their willingness to give him a huge budget, but $150 million? Isn't that excessive?

Add your vote! 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

pivic
08/23/2009

Watchmen 3

In all fairness, the graphic novel upon which this film is based, is one of my favourite books of all time, so this had quite a bit to live up to. I didn't think Zack "300" Snyder would be able to direct it properly, but he sort of did it. Apart from what plagued "V For Vendetta" (my absolute favourite graphic novel, also penned by Alan Moore, who created and wrote "Watchmen"), i.e. the complete exclusion of the entire concept of anarchy in the script, I'm semi-glad of how the film turned out. Mostly based upon the acting of Jackie Earle Haley, who is really shaping up. The music is almost all 1960s, and I'll never forgive the movie people for letting My Chemical Romance record a Bob Dylan cover for this, and suitable for a film on humanity set in the 1980s. What I like most about the film, is how it asks many philosophical questions, almost all about humanity at its core, and prods xenophobic concepts, civil disobedience and trusting whoever's "above you" too much, whether it is government, "God" or your parents. Very nice cinematography, and I must add that Jeffrey Dean Morgan's acting was on-spot also; all in all, even the director's cut (3 hours long) holds up, and I strongly urge you to read the book which is much more multi-faceted and treats the reader as more intelligent than the film does.

Add your vote! 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

jedi58
08/17/2009

Watchmen 4

The Alan Moore written comic took a refreshing look at the superhero genre in a time when comics poked fun at themselves and manages to reinvent the genre as a struggle during the untrusting times of the Cold War. As a movie Alan Moore condemns the film and Hollywood as he has done many times before. Was this a fair judgement from the series author?

Who watches the Watchmen? This is a phrase seen in both the comic, and at least once in the movie. In the context of this movie (and indeed the comic series) it is a reference to the Keene Act which outlawed vigilantism in that it means who polices the Watchmen, and who can ensure that they act within the law and that any injustices they commit will be punished. This is the problem, they act outside the law, and so in the eyes of the government and the police force they are as bad as the criminals they fight. Alternatively, this phrase has also been used in viral marketing campaigns to advertise the Watchmen's theatrical release, altering it's original meaning to suggest who is going to watch the Watchmen.

The popularity of Watchmen as a comic series is understandable. Whilst it doesn't portray any of the usual characteristics of a superhero series it does bring a sense of realism, and to some degree futility, to the genre. The story follows a group of retired superheroes, the Watchmen, who are the second generation of superheroes and who followed in the footsteps of the Minute Men. The original Minute Men were a group of people who had no superpowers, they just put on a mask and costume and tried to bring some justice to the world by reigning in gangs and giving people hope. As they retired and the second generation took over the views on the so-called superhero community had changed and an official Act was passed which re-illegalised masked vigilantism. Years later Rorschach is still a masked vigilante and he begins to investigate the murder of one of the original Minute Men, the Comedian.

The Comedian was someone who claimed to understand human nature, and he set himself up as a cruel parody of it, and for the most part, everything you see the Comedian do in flashbacks throughout the story shows he is more of a villain than a hero and is a symbol of why the Keene Act was the right thing to do at the time. The story has a slight 1920's detective movie feel to it where the investigator is narrating the story to us through a journal, though this isn't the sole method of story telling as this is limited to when we see Rorschach alone.

The sometimes slow pace of the film deals with the lives and the past for the surviving members, the Silk Spectre II, Dr. Manhattan, Rorschach, Night Owl, and Ozymandias as the world is falling apart around them, on the brink of the Cold War erupting into a nuclear war. At the time Watchmen was written the Cold War was a very topical subject, and many feared nuclear conflict was a possibility. In this "alternative timeline" these heroes follow a plot from a "mask killer" who in the fashion of other comic book villains declares his plans to the heroes. In this instance though the villain is actually a genius and has only told the heroes because they can't stop him - he has already initiated his plan, killing a million innocent people. What is unusual about this is that the villain does win, he has killed and has gotten away with it. As mad as the heroes are, it is only Rorschach who wants to tell the world what has taken place, despite the worlds beliefs that they need to unite against a common enemy. The villains argument is that in telling the world the truth, that the million of lives lost would have been taken in vain. There is now peace between America and Russia and the truth would only destroy this new found alliance.

The debate to be had here is who took the right stance, should evil be allowed to win for the benefit of all life on Earth, or should there be no exception - should always be brought in to be served justice for their misdemeanour. It's hard to know what is right, but you cannot really justify those deaths even if it has saved billions. If it was allowed where would the line be drawn before it is considered wrong? That is the problem, in the end Rorschach stood alone in his beliefs, he was the true hero despite his methods in bringing justice to criminals. This character can easily be compared to Batman in his methods of bringing fear to the underworld, and despite the following quote he does believe in justice and honour.

This city is afraid of me. I have seen its true face. The streets are extended gutters and the gutters are full of blood and when the drains finally scab over, all the vermin will drown. The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout "Save us!"... and I'll look down and whisper "No." They had a choice, all of them.

The way the depth is brought to all the principal characters is brilliant. Quite often when we see flashbacks they distract from the main story, but here they serve to show what drives the characters and how the world has become the way it is in the film.

We can also see a transition between the Minute Men and the Watchmen which is symbolic of the transitions which have taken place in comic books with how characters are portrayed. The Minute Men were around as a group from 1939 to 1949, the same sort of period when comics first took a lighter, more comical approach to try and alleviate the depression of the Second World War. Characters which had previously been dark, brooding characters become light-hearted and jovial (such as Adam West's portrayal of Batman in the camp 1960's television series), wearing a bright coloured costume (though the campness didn't really happen until after the TV series). It was the same for the Minute Men - they wore brightly coloured costumes and never really took themselves seriously. When the Watchmen took over both their costumes and their mannerisms became more serious as the times were changing. This grimness in the 1986 penned series also reflected other comic book series such as Batman where the character had gone back to his roots and became a darker hero.

What I find interesting about the naming of the two superhero groups is the symbolism behind them. The minutemen in actuality were an elite group of soldiers hand-picked from militia during the American Revolutionary War of 1775-1783, though the name also draws parallels with the timing of when the story is set also. During the Cold War a clock was used to symbolise how many "minutes to midnight" the world was at - indicating how close they were to war and nuclear annihilation. So you can see how the name "Minute Men" could also be seen as being the minutes before midnight, before the darkness of war.

The film is faithful to the comics despite there being the occasional changes and bits cut from the story. The cinematography for the film is pretty amazing and has many excellent visual pieces such as the death of the Comedian at the very start of the film - it aids in bringing a sense of drama to a scene that has no dialogue.

The soundtrack I cannot fault, with classics like Bob Dylan's "The Times They Are A Changing", Leonard Cohen's "Hallelujah", Simon and Garfunkel's "The Sound of Silence" and Jimi Hendrix's rendition of Bob Dylan's "All Along the Watchtower". Even songs like Nena's "99 Luft Ballons" somehow seem to fit in with the story being told. Personally I find the choice of music to be absolute genius.

Despite having read the comic first I do find the movie to be thoroughly enjoyable despite moments where you just have to put up with the slow pace. If you're a fan of superhero movies or comics and have not yet seen this film then it is probably a good film to see.

Add your vote! 5 Helpful / 0 Funny / 2 Agree / 0 Disagree

truthbetold64
07/14/2009

Watchmen 4

Loved this show ... to be honest ... I originally mistook this for "The Watcher" a Marvel Comic character ... but since I had planned on going to the movies, I decided what the heck ... so since I had not followed the comic ... I enjoyed it.

Add your vote! 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

pgc6000
03/26/2009

Watchmen 2

Okay, to put it plain and simple, this movie is one of the most dissapointing pieces of cinema I've seen in awhile. Going into the theater with my popcorn and soda at hand, I expected an action packed, thriller filled movie (that's how it was advertised, right?) Well, 3 hours and a full bladder later, I wanted to cry. Not because the movie touched me or moved me, but because it was so damn bad. I had been looking forward to Watchmen since the summer, and what a slap in the face. Before I get into the bad things, I'll name the few goods things.... Acting was good, story was pretty good and unique, and special effects were cool. Sounds appealing. Don't be fooled. The movie, which is a whopping 3 hours, is simply 3 hours of suck. It tries to hard to touch you, takes itself to seriously to be taken seriously. The worst part is, there is barely ANY action in it. I'm sorry folks, but if it's a superhero story, no matter how powerful it's meant to be, it needs action. Plus, you see blue penis way to often. Not good, at all.

Add your vote! 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

Thomas Winter Aabo
03/19/2009

Watchmen 2

1 star for the 'mankind is an affront to creation... but who cares anyway' and 1 star for Blue Penis.

Add your vote! 2 Helpful / 1 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

Automatt
03/16/2009

Watchmen 2

In an excellent opening title sequence, this movie creates an alternate reality from 1940 where superheroes are a part of everyday life. These opening credits are, unfortunately, the best part of the movie. If I had walked out after them it would have been $9 well spent. Instead, I stayed, and was treated to nearly three hours of costumed preaching, pontificating, and a few slow-motion fight scenes. A few people walked out of the theater early, I should have.

Add your vote! 2 Helpful / 1 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

vijai
03/16/2009

Watchmen 2

First be warned about the grossy and nudity scenes in the film. Probably its better to learn the story from someone first before you hit the theatre. the graphics are ok. the sequences are tied to each other so make sure you are awake for the entire movie to understand.

Add your vote! 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

christy4
03/07/2009

Watchmen 3

Guess I am going to be the first one to rate this movie. My fiance and I had been looking forward to this one for months. We went on opening night to see it like a couple of nerds! I was excited to see what Snyder would do for this novel, as I was really a fan of 300. I tend to like these "graphic novel turned movies" like the aforementioned 300 and Sin City, so lets just say, I had high expectations. It began well. There was a stunningly surreal montage of American history images set to Bob Dylan's "Time are changin." I will admit, I was stunned when they recreated the assassination of JFK onscreen and showed the man on the grassy knoll. That was strike one. While the effects and photography were beautiful, there were a plethora of cringe-worthy awkward moments throughout...I could feel the audience around me shrinking back, giggling at seriously strained awkward moments and gasping out loud. And this was an audience who was expecting a GRAPHIC movie. It just went "there" too often. I was tempted to get up and leave several times at the audacity of some of the images and the ridiculous nature of some of the scenes. At one point I heard a mom tell her 16 year old son, "cover your eyes!!" There was honestly...HONESTLY a scene of two dogs fighting over the leg of a little girl...cute little Mary Jane still on her severed foot. I lost all patience at this point. Yes, it was an adaptation of a graphic novel, but aren't some things better left to the imagination? Zack Snyder stayed the course of the 300 love scene however, creating yet another soft-core porno, complete with thigh high boots around the owl-man's waist and cutie pie Malin Akerman making some serious o-faces. Yikes. The other thing that totally was too much to handle was that Mr. Manhattan was, well, biologically accurate. Lets just say, he brought a whole new meaning to the term "blue balls". That is not something that is really accepted yet...America can handle boobies galore, but not *gasp* penis shots. Me included. I couldn't even listen to the dialogue when he was onscreen because I was too focused on the voice in my head saying "Are they REALLY showing this guy, full frontal, in a 5 minute soliloquey scene?"

Sigh. This went on much longer than intended. Oh, the irony. The worst part of Watchmen was that it lasted THREE HOURS. They squeeeeeeeeeeeeeezed as much as they could and still, 3 hours. There were a mind boggling amount of characters...each with their own set of 5 flashbacks. I was wishing I had a notepad by hour two.

One surprising bonus was the unknown-to-me actor who played Rohrschach. He was brilliant. Gravelly voice, disturbing childhood, really good acting. I could FEEL his pain.

All together, beautiful to look at, BORING and very disturbing to watch.

Add your vote! 4 Helpful / 1 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

11 reviews!     « Previous  |  Page    of  1  |  Next »

view stats
2.91
average based on 11 ratings