| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | BAMBOB (0) 05/28/2008 | my 94 ranger ext. cab 4.0 2wd 5sd manual trans has 150,000 mi and as long as i keep a clean air filter in it and the factory sixe tires on it properly infated and dont drive like a maniac it truthfully gets 27 mpg hwy and 22mpg city.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Taziebaby (0) 03/07/2008 | I have a 1994 Ranger with 301000 miles on it. I has been in the shop 6 times all those miles. I think it is great!!
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | djlong (0) 01/26/2008 | 2004 ranger 4x4 4 liter. fuel milage stinks 15-16 in winter.18 in summer.drive truck easy keep oil changed and filters changed.very disapointed.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | socalguy (0) 11/17/2007 | I have a 2004 Ford Ranger. With all of these Shift Solenoid blogs I am reading, can anyone tell me how to locate the shift solenoid/s? Is there a schematic or exploded view of my tranny online. It is a 2004 Ford Ranger FX4. Thanks in advance.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | 1958dodgeregent (0) 11/07/2007 | Am leasing a 2005 Ranger, the Edge, extended cab, V6, automatic. Good power and is usually dependable. Sometimes has a problem with the ignition lock not unlocking. Road side assistance mentioned that you have to leave the key in the ignition with your foot on the brake and wiggle the steering wheel with both hands. This unlocks the thing. Lately the steering column gear shift refused to move though the engine would start. The solinoid in the steering column had went, a warranty repair. Also had another warranty repair which had to do the air filter. It would be occasionally hard to start in cold weather (I live in Canada). The dealership also just informed me that my brake fluid needs to be flushed as the aluminum brake lines and moisture cause sludge to form. This truck is only two years old with 34,000 kilometers on it and that seems rather dubious to me. When the lease runs out I will turn it back in and find another dealer.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | joeman144 (0) 08/07/2007 | I got an 04 Ranger EDGE with a 4.0 Liter V6, Gas Mileage could be better but GREAT acceleration and plenty of Power, I've drag raced and Beat a 2007 Silverado 1500, 2000 Ford F-150, 2007 Ford F-150 and a 1998 Mustang 3.8 Liter, Never Had a single problem with it!!1
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | nasincali (0) 05/06/2007 | had a 1994 ranger 163000 miles no problems
had a 1999 rqnger 40000 miles evry problem
never buy a ford again ,service dept sucked so bad
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Grizzlyistheshizz (0) 04/23/2007 | i got a 94 ford ranger 6 cyl its got over 200,000 miles still drives like its new never had one problem wit it if keep up wit the maintance. It gets great gas milliage but i will agree cab way to small but overall a great truck.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | kissmeback (5) 02/04/2007 | the same thing i said the cabin is too small.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | rocketdriver (0) 01/23/2007 | 12 miles per gallon at best. Always broken down, 6 cyl. engine sucks, no power, acceleration... overall, stay clear of this pig.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | teddy0311 (0) 01/04/2007 | ALL KINDS OF PROBLEMS! 2004 FX4 Level 2 39000 miles. when i 1st got it the fuel cut of switch would always trip. I thought it did it again but nope. I changed the fuel filter that didnt help. Now it dont get any fire. Any suggestions?
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | ranger_man (0) 11/03/2005 |  2003 Ranger, 4.0l, 5spd, 4.10 limited slip diffs, 32" TSLs, Flowmaster.
16 miles per gallon.
Off road weekly, and intensly (with jeeps on 33"+ and lockers)
That being said, this truck is the best vehicle I've ever owned, it has plenty of power, comfortable, nice interior, and is very fun to drive, I now have approx 44,000 miles on it, and have had it for about 1 year.
I use my truck for everything from going out partying in, to moving, to wheeling, to daily driving.
The only things I don't like are the low gas mileage, but I drive hard. Also the fact that the front axle does not articulate, and that I've gone through 3 fan clutches so far, also replaced the slave cylinder at 35,000 miles.
I have now power accessories, other than steering, and Air conditioning.
This truck is the best of 5 rangers I've owned (I've owned 83,86,88,90,03) and I would never think of getting rid of it as it gets plenty of comments, can waste a honda in a street race, and still schools Jeeps and Hummers offroad, and its pretty enough to get the ladies' attention.
I am stationed in Arkansas, but also have had this truck in Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, Mississippi, Iowa, South Dakota, North Dakota, Minnesota, Tennessee, and the truck has hauled and passed through all those states and various weather conditions (115 degrees to -35 degrees and a blizzard) and never had any problems, it does get squirrley on ice and wet asphalt though
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | hadgie76 (0) 10/08/2005 | Great truck. I have a 98 ranger 2wd with 155,000 miles and have had no troubles out of the ordinary. I maintain it regularly, i.e. T-belt, oil changes and other maintance stuff. I've owned GM and Chrystler and neither were as dependable as my ford. I will be buying another ford! Admittedly my 2wd is a 4cyl and is underpowered so I will be opting for a bigger engine next time.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | RoverRoad (0) 09/25/2005 | Mine is a '99, 4liter V6 4X4. It gets about 18 miles to the gallon. I like it because I've had it for 4 years and it hasn't given me any troubles yet. Knock on wood... It has about 58k miles on it and still gets me to work every day.
This is my first Ford. I hesitated to go with Ford but it runs better than any Chevy I've ever had.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | jkholley111 (0) 08/11/2005 | 2001 takes a beating , good on gas and easy to drive. love it
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | numbah16tdhaha (144) 07/29/2004 | At least you can push it easier than a full size.
(7 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | scorpiomaster07 (0) 06/19/2004 | i bought my 98 4cyl in Jan. of 99 and it is the best car/truck i've ever owned...i make a lot of deliveries in it and it has over 230,000 miles on it and still running...besides normal wear and tear like brakes and batteries the timing belt and clutch are the only things i've had to replace...the clutch went out when it had around 215,000 miles...the auto repair shop where i buy my tires are always surpise it's still running when i go there...i've heard that fords usually isn't known to get high miles and keeps breaking down but i've been very happy with mine...this is my first ford and i don't know if i just got luck with this one
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | latoni (0) 05/25/2004 | I got a 2004 Ranger FX4 Level II.. Worst truck I've ever owned. Based on my experience with this truck I will never buy a ford again. This truck feals so checp and sweeks & rattels so much that I feal like i'm driving one of those battery powered barbie jeeps. FORD Fix Or Repair Daily. Well I've had a problem almost every week.. I have 10,000kms on it and it's been in the shop 8 times. I had a 1994 ranger and loved it.. The new ford products SUCK ....
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | R. L. (0) 04/07/2004 | I gave this truck a two star rating because it is American made ,Othrewise its a one. Dont buy this with the idea great trucks are built, not bought. What you test drive is all youre going to get. This is not a expandable platform at all I dont care how much Flowmaster , B&M or after market reprograming you do you'll not do as well as a stock chevy or Dodge V-8 for the same money, However for a cheap little delivery vehicle at a cheap price go for it, as for my daily driver its sad, slow and a real eago booster for the little old lady who leaves me behind at the red light. 3.0 5 sprrd standard
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Kevj (0) 07/17/2003 | I have a 2001 Ford Ranger and I have had it for 3 weeks now and I love it, its has almost all the options including power windows, locks, and mirrors, and it also has the 4th door. It has an automatic transmission w/ the 3.0 V6 and it gives power whenever needed, havent had a problem out of my ranger yet. It didnt come with fog lights or running bars but I will b geting them soon, this is a very durable truck and mine has 29,000.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | dickgozinya (2) 06/25/2003 | Sucks! Driving along when the engine just exploded with no cause.Dealor could'nt even figure out why. The interior is small and cramped. only good thing is 4.0L wish that was the engine I had.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | lincolnsandcadillacs (4) 06/05/2003 | In 1994 I bought a brand new Ford Ranger for $7700. It was a white, no option stripped down version. A very dull, underpowered (4 cyl) truck. But never gave me a single problem in the four years I owned it. I lived in the South and this truck had no AC. If I do buy another Ranger, I'll make sure mine comes with power steering, AC, radio, carpeting, etc. Also I'll take mine with a more powerful engine.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Solenoid DH (19) 04/29/2003 | A very durable and dependable pickup. I have a friend who doesn't even like Fords but he bought one of these anyway, because it was too good to pass up.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | RebelYell1861 (9) 04/29/2003 | I haven't had any problems with mine and would buy another one in a heartbeat.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | sdcadavid4 (0) 04/28/2003 | I just bought a really nice 2000 extra cab used because I could not afford a Toyota My ranger has 6 cylainders and is a five speed cylinder. I get 9, that's ( miles per gallon. I have never had a car so bad. It is comfortabble though My 1992 automatic got 13
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | BIGBABY (10) 02/18/2003 | Best small truck. You can get a 4X4 Quad Cab for less than $25,000. Need a crew cab small truck? Get the Explorer Sport Trac, its based on the Ranger and Explorer.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | DK'sride (0) 03/05/2002 | This Ranger is a 2001. I know it's a half a truck, but it's all I could afford. You see Ford rents our large parking lot as a depot for Rangers to be shipped to dealers around the country, so I've looked at alot of them. The back flip down seats suck, my kids won't ride in the back because they're heads hit the back window. I find myself looking around the rear view mirror to see traffic ahead and to the right. I still don't understand the plastic sides on top of the sides of the box. The things I do like, the side doors, CD player and sound systems great, on the fly 4 wheel drive. I hope Ford can fix these problems someday because there's no room for three kids and an Adult in the front.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | brunette (0) 05/05/2001 | I feel I would love to have this truck. I'm 16 and my dad has a F150 so He could have the daddy truck and I could have the junior truck. I love this truck. I love fords in general. I give is a 4.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | artbuf (0) 04/24/2001 | Great little truck, good sound system. Only problem is with the engine in idle, it seems like it is going to die (independent of fuel quality). After 23,000+ miles, I still love this thing!
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | ElwayLite (0) 01/24/2001 | I am a big fan of Ford, this is my 2nd ranger and i have to agree with the fact that the newer rangers dont have great quality..I owned a 98 which was great but i only had it for 18k miles, my 99 now has 35k miles and has developed squeeks, whines and other annoying noises, and my 3.0 acts funny sometimes wanting to die out....I just think by sellin so many the quality has gone down..if you want one get a pre 98 and get atleast the 4.0 v6 ....also be prepared for TERRIBLE gas mileage.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | jnagy (0) 12/29/2000 | '92 ext cab 4.0L 5spd automatic....carried 1000 pounds of tools and a big cap for 249,990 highway miles (18 gpm) to date.....Good workmanship (love the UAW members)....poor engineering.....lots of maintenance....If I could, I would tether Ford Engineers into Purgatory for a million years, for their extremely fragile Air Conditioning system, ($3000.00 actual maintenance cost)... and because the 5speed automatic tranny DEMANDS filter and FULL service every 15,000 miles (not 30,000 miles as Engineers claim in owner's manual)....replacement/towing/second replacement cost $3700.00 and much inconvenience to learn that little truth. Smart Mechanic says that -A4LD tranny is still poison in 2000.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | f1509181om (0) 07/31/2000 | Too small,
This was designed for pussies...
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | PoorOldEdgarDerby (4) 06/05/2000 | I'm not really a pickup truck kinda guy but I rented one of these for an extended period of time and I have to say I was quite impressed. Perhaps I don't have a lot to compare it to other than the occasional ride in someone else's truck but I really liked this truck. Not much acceleration but hey it's a truck right. Comfortable inside I drove it on a couple of 17 hour trips. I found it to be quiet on the highway, smooth riding, easy to handle, great visibility from all directions, very very accomodating. The only complaint I have is that with the hardcover for the bed there wasn't a lot of height to carry stuff. From the bed to the cover is probably only aobut 2 feet.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | jimwin54 (0) 03/10/2000 | The best truck I ever owned.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Davi4322om (0) 02/19/2000 | This is the best selling-WORST built truck in America. Pingig, mis-aligned welds, shoddy workmanship, and NO POWER, except for 4.0's which have decent power. This truck has many problems beginning with the 98 model year.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | late4102du (0) 02/10/2000 | Tremendous jack-of-all-trades-but-master-of-none pickup. Anonymous evidently doesn't take very good care of his vehicles because no truck, GM, Chrysler, or Ford, can experience that kind of wear in only 40k. Wish the Ranger had a better engine to compete with the 4.3 Chevy and the V8 powered Dakotas though.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Bass3491om (0) 02/05/2000 | Too small. Get a real truck.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | koka3793om (0) 01/25/2000 | Had the 4.0ltr V6 Auto Supercab 4x4. In 40,000 miles it blew the heads twice, radiator once, intake manifold gasket 4 times, tranny twice, rearend once, steering box twice, had to have the master cylinder replaced and 2 brake jobs done, 1 set of tires ( I HATE FIRESTONES!) and during all of this Ford REFUSED to provide me with a rental.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-38 OF 38 | View All |