| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | nochange (0)
04/02/2008 | he did beat sugar ray leonard and roberto duran.he was a good boxer who got exposed when he had to let his hands go.loses to dela hoya,trinidad,chavez.he couldnt hold his own vs pressure boxers
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Randyman (109)
04/14/2005 | Not one of my favorites. Edwin Rosario kicked his rear end in, and Camacho was given the fight. One of many reasons I don't like him.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | jaywilton (29)
04/11/2005 | It would be very interesting to see how he'd do against Erik Morales and Marco Antonio Barrera,for example at 130.After he moved up and fought the late Edwin Rosario and won one of the all-time great wars(I gave the edge to Rosario),he became a totally safety-first fighter,who looked like he was more concerned with what he wore into the ring.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| kattwoman (25)
04/07/2005 | im giving him a 4 but not for boxing . its for his appearance in playgirl magazine many years ago
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Killa11 (0)
02/21/2005 | Im going to give him a 3 because of his granite chin. Camacho should have lost the fight against Mancini, and was really dominated by all the high-grade fighters in the 90s. A Hall of Famer for sure, but not definate. It would be a great fight to see him in the Barerra, Morales and Pacquio division for a throwback simulation. Modern Day Comparison might be more Naseem Hamed. Not really any power because he kept jumping up in weight. But the chin was outstanding. Never Ko'd in his career.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | dorsett33 (1)
12/16/2004 | had all the talent,but wasted it on drugs,booze and girls.as a featherweight he had incredible handspeed.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| Mistachill (0)
07/07/2004 | Deserves a lot more props than people give him. The only has 5 losses on his record, four of them to De La Hoya, Trinidad, Chavez, and Haugen - 4 champions and 3 all-time greats.
Another guy who's career has to be view in stages. As a Super Featherweight he was the man! He lost something moving up in weight but still won fights.
The guy was a nut, but a great fighter none the less. And for the record, Duran never beat him.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| jake jr (0)
08/26/2003 | overrated. Even a 50 year old Duran beat him. Even though the score card didnt show it
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| macho madness (0)
05/30/2003 | Macho Time, he made it look so easy, as a former fighter we all wish we could promote ourselves like he did and make it look so easy.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | zippo (0)
05/25/2003 | Macho Camacho is an all time great. He came from the streets of Spanish Harlem and made millions. As a boxer, he was a great ticket seller. He went undefeated in the entire decade of the 1980s! His accomplishments in the sport are very underrated.He's definitely one of the five best fighters I have seen in my lifetime.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| allknowing (0)
02/14/2003 | he had skillz but was no great in his weight class proven over and over and over when he faced real boxers with equal skill or greater
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| Frankie Da Bull (0)
10/11/2002 | Good boxer, lousy fighter. No balls but plenty of brains.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| maddmarxx (0)
01/09/2001 | Camacho won as many fights because of his marketability as he did for dominating his opponent.He is one of the best examples of the corruptive force of money in boxing(i.e. the Don King syndrome.)
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-13 OF 13 | View All |
