GenghisTheHun 01/04/2009
This was the best of the lot; of course, I like the battle scenes. The seige scene is a great last stand episode.
Helpful
Funny
Agree
Disagree
HondaRider91 09/06/2008
My Favorite will always be The Fellowship Of The Ring, but this film is incredible in a whole other way. Our heroes continue their quest to Mordor to destroy the ring. You are introduced to a whole new group of folks, and are shown some great battle scenes starting around halfway through the film. Gimli is also hilarious in this one.
Spike65 07/26/2008
Another fantastic film in the three-part series.
RichardMarshal 01/27/2008
Faramir was written out of the films, replaced by another character called Faramir with nothing in common except their name, blood-tie to Boromor and military rank and function. The film devolves further from the script, and there is no end to Jackson's lame excuses and explanations as to why he did such a poor translation this time around. The story really turns into a piece of trash, saved by Tolkiens depth of language and Boyens natural talent as a writer. The costumes and sets are the best ever seen on film, and the cinematography is excellent. Jackson did a good job but he and his wife mangled the script so badly, and devolved all the characters and relationships so horribly I'm saddened to see how badly Jackson failed to understand Lord of the Rings, instead replacing his own values with Tolkiens.
fb689460056 11/17/2007
ok i admitt it i am a fan of lord of the rings
fb644129637 11/11/2007
Great movie. Its the middle of the best series ever so yer... it owns! The action in it was cool especially the siege of helms deep.
fb673765617 11/09/2007
crappppp
fb741612703 11/09/2007
Fab!
ProffessorOppe nheimer 05/16/2007
Es ist der schlechteste LOTR Film. Und ich hasse LOTR irgendwie.
PixarFan2007 05/08/2007
The second part of Lord of the Rings is as good as the first and third parts. Frodo and Sam are on their own and are joined by Gollum, who has split personalities. He wants the ring for himself. This has a lot of good moments and nice special effects too.
Jeremy00081 09/13/2006
This is one of the best movies I've ever seen. It mesmorized me and made me care about the good guys beating the bad guys. Great acting and special effects. An instant classic.
oscargamblesfr o 02/09/2006
Superb, Christopher Lee was perfect for Saruman and Andy Serkis as Gollum was remarkable.
BlueOrchid 12/14/2005
It seemed a little long and nothing really happened at all with Merry & Pippin...always sitting on the damn Ent throughout the movie.
OutsideBlitz 11/29/2005
If you read my Star Wars Episode III comment, it applies here. The Two Towers was the only Lord of the Rings I remotely understood. however, I only understood it about 45%.
decalod85 11/28/2005
Peter Jackson took out perfectly good stuff that would have translated fine into this movie and replaced it with his own crap. Movie is good, but the butchering of the original story sucked.
CanadaSucks 10/29/2005
The raid on the fortress sequence was amazing. . .terrific film.
INOitALL 10/29/2005
The best of the series mainly because it is now over.
shadowlink 08/10/2005
The battle at Helms Deep was amazing!
fantasyfalles 07/04/2005
it rocked! war scenes were cool!
louiethe20th 05/20/2005
My personal favorite in the trilogy.
Maomania 02/27/2005
I think this was an amazing movie. The best Lord of the rings movie ever. The huge battle was just breathtaking, I've neven seen anything like that before. Peter Jackson left a legacy and I could watch that movie every day. One of my all time favorite.
Mooselover 02/21/2005
The Best of the LOTR Trilogy. It was the most exciting and didn't feel too long like the others. Plus the battle scenes were an absolute joy to watch!
sfalconer 12/20/2004
This has more action than the first one and goes by quite quickly considering the 3 hour run time. It picks up the story right were the first film left off but if you have not seen the first you will be lost. The battle scenes are great with wonderful effects.
Djahuti 11/16/2004
Yes, a feast for the eyes.Did not follow the book exactly,but this book is NOT an easy read.
ANSGARD 07/09/2004
Probably the best of the 3 films, I really love it. Its amazing how Tolkien created such characters ..
Ellie 4 JD, RW n GV! 05/19/2004
Again good but drawn out
CherrySoda99 03/31/2004
Of all the LOTR movies, I wouold have to say this one is my favorite. If I can sit through this movies 5 times and not get tired of it, you know I must love it. And it's not just because of Orlando's eye shot closeup in Fangorn Forest. Although that did keep me on the edge of my seat for about 5 minutes afterwards.( That was when I was obsessed with him, which I'm not anymore by the way) This one definetly has the best battle scene. The batle at Helms Deep is amazingly crafted. It took them a long time to build that set. I think they said about 7 months. And then it gets destroyed! Talk about hard work gone before your eyes! But it's all worth it. My favorite 2 lines from the battle scene. 1st, from Legolas talking to Gimli when he can't see. GimliWhat's happening? LegolasShall I describe it to you, or would you like me to find you a box?. My second favorite, again from Gimli and Legolas. When their fighting the Orcs and such, Gimli Leoglas! Two already! Leoglas I'm on 17! Gimli Argh! I'll have no pointy ear outscoring me! Legolas19! It's hilarious! Ya, I know, I'm a die-hard fan!
Cosmo Renfro 03/12/2004
A good film that I recomend. The directing and special effects are beautiful.
pikachan 02/01/2004
Not as good as the first installment of the trilogy. It had some nice battle scenes and i thought that Gollum was a good character. I will rent the third installment when it comes out.
orangeisawesom e 12/21/2003
A mind-blowing experience. The extended edition of the Two Towers is worth every penny.One of the greatest sequels ever made.
irishgit 12/18/2003
Clearly a bridging movie between the first and the third. Still, very good, but suffers a bit from a feel of being a chunk out of the story.
Byrdiohead 12/08/2003
Orlando Bloom stole the show and made me jump out of my seat and cheer when he slid down the stairs while firing off arrows at hapless orc and then proceeded to separate some heads from some bodies when he reached the bottom. This film only betters the formula established in the first film. Gollum is a top notch performance. That character made me lauch and tremble and even feel sorry for him. He was brilliant. I hope this trend continues into the third film.
freebird_0128 11/12/2003
This film is fantastic! It betters the first one which is hardly possible. The actors are magnificent and the special effects in the battle scenes are worth taking many double takes. A trumph for film-making even if it fudges on Tolkien's version a little.
quezacotl 11/03/2003
I loved the battle at Helm's Deep and the part where the Ents attack Isengard.
jbiscuit1 08/06/2003
I found this film to be about as good as its prequel with simmilar results. The film contained excellent special effects which really drove home the realism of Middle Earth. However, the entire sub-plot with regard to talking and walking trees was not well developed, and essentially childish. Gollum was excellent, but not oscar worthy.
forgotten hero 06/10/2003
Not what I expected. The first LOTR was almost exactly like the book but the second one strayed from the original story. On the plus side gollum was done extremely well. The digital character in the last Harry Potter POS looked like crap in comparison.
lotr417 05/28/2003
Once I saw the Fellowship, I couldn't wait for the Two Towers to come out. And the only bad thing about the Two Towers is it makes it that much harder to wait for the Return of the King. One of the very best movies of all time. You just don't know what you're missing until you've been a part of the Lord of the Rings!
gummocatkilla 05/24/2003
Never read the books but I'm in love with this movie series.
Ready 05/22/2003
This movie sucked and that's about all I have to say.
OnThe60 05/21/2003
The movie was pretty good. I'm only giving this movie a "terrible" rating, because I feel that it should be below "The Matrix: Reloaded" most definitely.
jfellrath 05/20/2003
Masterful movie - the acting is top notch and the cinematography is spectacular'
emma7of9 05/14/2003
I loved this movie, even more than I loved the first one. It is fun trying to spot friends in it and the odd famous person I have met. And it is good to know that this level of achievement can come out of my school. Great Movie
domino10 05/11/2003
The scenery & special effects are awesome. Can't wait for the third.
Cherlena 04/28/2003
Enjoyed this even more than the first which was excellent. Thrilled to see our h.s. aged children even fascinated though they have never read the book like their mom did (many years ago!).
redhotrage 04/21/2003
Don't get me wrong, Chicago was fine. But lets get real Academy, LOTR The Two Towers was the best picture of the year hands down. Now, I'm not one of these fanatics and I actually thought the first one could have been a little shorter, but the 2nd has more action and excitement. It flows better, Gullom-Smiegel is a lot of fun to watch and the whole movie it is a true cinematic masterpiece. I will say that from reading a bit from some of the comments here from people psycho-analyzing the film to the extreme to another person calling it "Christian" and Harry Potter "anti-Christian" need to remember ITS JUST A MOVIE, a science fiction movie and not to take it so seriously! Chill out folks. However, LOTR is a fantastic film, no question.
resisobilus 04/04/2003
This movie deserves a word which I do not apply lightly: masterpiece. If I could give it more stars, I would. This is perfect film-making. Not one frame is dull. Each of it's 181 minutes is enthralling. Everyone would find something to enjoy.
lanelle 04/01/2003
Well, I think this one was a bit more fun to watch than the first one. I happened to agree with Ebert on both - the first one was very awkwardly paced and in this one the main heroes, the hobbits, seem to take a back seat to Helm's Deep - a battle that occupied one short chapter in the book. This guy I know thought it would've been better to end the movie with the cliffhanger Tolkien used in the book (I guess I shouldn't give it away to non-readers). As an avid fan of the book I'd have to agree. I was discussing with some online fans what will be left out due to their chopping the main events off the end of the second book, and we ended up agreeing that quite a bit will be (I'm guessing Aragorn will not take the POTD). I noticed the absence of the twins - Arwen's brothers, and wondered why it couldn't have been them with some Elves and the other Rangers to come down and help with the battle. But I guess Jackson wanted to give Lorien a bigger role. And, oh, I just love the decision to sacrifice Rohan's Nordic blond genes and traditional braids so that they could look all dissheveled compared to the more organized Elves. What bothered me most was not just Faramir but basically all the human leaders seemed to be many characters with one face - despaired, corruptible and unwise... perhaps so the Elves will seem so much better by comparison? I was highly disappointed in the movie's depiction of both Faramir, and Theoden - who first left the highly-esteemed Aragorn dead on the field (something noone of an honorable and militant culture such as Rohan's would dream of doing), and then even tho he was cured lost all his Rohirric "courage and spirit". Although I think the worst thing about this one was the sleep-inducing and unnecessary amount of time they devoted to Arwen. Give her a couple of blips, fine, but I insist they overdid it. I think the best thing about this movie was Gollum. I was surprisingly impressed that there was actually nothing I would change about him.
WilShakes1 04/01/2003
The book on which the three films are based is conventionally, and incorrectly, referred to as a "trilogy"...a term that describes three books that are related but each a complete work in itself--able to stand independently of the others. Lord of the Rings is actually a single novel divided into three parts by the publisher for reasons of convenience. Critics who call The Two Towers a "sequel" are mistaken. It is part two of a three part work, and is best judged as such. As such, and anticipating a similar quality level in the as-yet-unseen third intalment, it is excellent work. Jackson's emendations were by and large more respectful of the novel than anyone has a right to expect, given the film industry's historically rocky relationship to literature, especially great literature.
Mentok the Mindtaker 04/01/2003
I haven't seen a more visually astounding film yet with the possible exception of The Fellowship of The Ring.
ozfan 03/24/2003
Not quite as good as the first, but still left me looking forward to the next!
89 reviews! « Previous | Page of 2 | Next »
Sort by Newest Oldest Most helpful Least helpful Highest rated Lowest rated