Privacy

Approval Rate: 37%

37%Approval ratio

Reviews 28

Sort by:
  • by

    ladyjesusfan77_7

    Wed Oct 22 2008

    There is no such thing as privacy anymore.

  • by

    chalky

    Mon Aug 20 2007

    They know my favorite flavor at Baskin Robbins is vanilla and that my favorite band is Color Me Badd. Darn it all.

  • by

    schadenfreudia_nslip

    Fri Apr 27 2007

    Although anmalone is correct in that the "right to privacy" appears nowhere in the amendments, the 4th amendment implies a right (to privacy) of individuals against illegal searches and seizures and arrests without legal warrants.This issue betrays the hypocrisy of our recent collection of conservatives.  The hypocrisy that chased me out of the Republican Party (but not necessarily into the warm bosom of the Dems) is that while they excoriate and ridicule "government" they, under GWB, have created the largest one in history...primarily because there's some near-psychotic need to "control" the populace and the current number of staff on the NSA, Homeland Security and CIA weren't nearly enough to watch everybody.  The incremental erosion of a person's right to privacy (from government snooping), a hallmark of the establishment of the nation, is the one Constitutional amendment under constant bombardment.If you look at how Germans, beginning in 1932, willingly endured a gradual, almost im... Read more

  • by

    frankswildyear_s

    Wed Mar 28 2007

    Bill Maher from Real Time:Oh, please, Americans don't want privacy. They want attention! They'll put a camera in their shower and show it on the Internet! To get on television, they'll marry strangers and eat a cow's rectum, and ice dance with Todd Bridges. They're trying to get on a show called "Big Brother"! We are a nation of exhibitionists from "me" to shining "me." And what we really fear isn't that someone's listening; it's that no one's listening. This whole country is one big desperate cry for somebody to listen to "listen to me, photograph me, Google me, read my blog!" "Read my diary; read my memoir. It's not interesting enough? I'll make sh*t up!" You know that I could go on the Internet right now under my alternate screen name, "CherryXXX69," and get complete strangers to email me a picture of their scrotum. I tell you, this country gave the finger to privacy a long time ago.

  • by

    numbah16tdhaha

    Tue Mar 13 2007

    What are they going to find out by spying on me? Nothing. Spy away.

  • by

    zzzoom

    Thu Feb 02 2006

    This is a five star concern because it effects every American. Most issues effect only some portion of the public. At the present time our government seems intent on flexing its muscle, even if by doing so it is running over the rights and liberties of its own people. I don't understand the politics of it, although I recognize that the white house had no idea that it would be found out on this one. I'm flabergasted that they continue the program and even flaunt it in our faces now that they are discovered.

  • by

    the_one_true_freeman

    Mon Dec 05 2005

    have you guys ever read 1984? well, we dont want telescreens in every room, watching and listening to everything you do or say. then theres the secret police, and all that. i think we should have privicy, but if theres someone that has a criminal mind or sumthing, they shiould be watched. Big Brother is watching you.

  • by

    spartacus007

    Mon Sep 05 2005

    If you don't have control over your possessions and yourself, you don't own your life.

  • by

    deco354

    Thu May 05 2005

    Its a basic right!

  • by

    jaywilton

    Mon May 24 2004

    The right to privacy-along with basic consideration- has been eroding for several years;some people consider it a violation of their religion to listen to their own bad music quietly.

  • by

    virilevagabond

    Thu Mar 25 2004

    Along with the ballooning federal budget, privacy is and will remain one of the biggest issues facing Americans. Notwithstanding the fictional constitutional right to privacy that courts like to use on occasion, there is no real general constitutional right to privacy. This fact is easily recognized when one considers that every statute, regulation and common law principle violates one's privacy to a greater or lesser degree, yet these laws are not all constitutional issues. This leaves us with deciding how we shall statutorily frame our privacy rights in relation to the government and each other. With the relatively new terrorist threats and technology advances, these issues are pressing on American society more than ever before in our history. With these modern challenges, compromises are inevitable, indeed they must be made for survival, but we must be careful not to kill the patient with a nasty cure. Nevertheless, retaining privacy has risks and costs, and it would be hypocri... Read more

  • by

    darthrater

    Sat Dec 27 2003

    We already have the right to privacy. This isn't the 60s, folks.

  • by

    redoedo

    Wed Nov 26 2003

    It is the fundamental right of all American citizens, and it must be protected at all costs. I really don't see any need to write more than that.

  • by

    hendo76a

    Wed Aug 20 2003

    Ashcroft's "Patriot Act" is pretty creepy. With all the hyperbole that's being thrown around, it wouldn't surprise me if political dissidents or 15-year-old Johnny, who downloaded the new Eminem song, were considered "terrorists" and affected by this bill. Ben Franklin said, "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security"

  • by

    tencat

    Tue Jul 29 2003

    Every time America has been at war some have been removed, only to return after that war.

  • by

    gspotc6d

    Thu Jun 26 2003

    Privacy is good mmmkay!

  • by

    canadasucks

    Sat May 31 2003

    Our privacy has already been bought and sold.

  • by

    kamylienne

    Tue May 20 2003

    A big political issue because of the "Patriot's Act". I understand the need to protect our country, but why is the government seizing LIBRARY records without warrants? I don't care about cameras set up in the city or the streets, just as long as they keep it out of my house. No, I really don't care that about all these cameras out in public, they can look through all my records all they want, but it's just IRRITATING to know that someone's doing that, and it makes you wonder how far they'll go.

  • by

    getback

    Thu May 08 2003

    above all the common person must be protected ,we can not through out the baby with the bath water

  • by

    twinmom101

    Wed May 07 2003

    God, ammalone! How can anyone be so out of touch with reality? If a citizen's right to privacy is such "pernicious silliness" then why don't you volunteer to be the first one to have a government probe crammed up your butt. There is nothing silly about protecting our right for privacy and because it is not explicitly stated in the Constitution does not mean it is not worth supporting. The framers of the Constitution did not explicitly outline privacy because it was a given and none of our founding fathers would have ever thought the issues of civil liberties we face now would be issues.

  • by

    anmalone

    Tue Feb 18 2003

    Find it in the Constitution then I'll support it. Not it's penumbra or emanation and not even it’s reflection. Pernicious silliness.

  • by

    wilshakes1

    Fri Feb 07 2003

    The right to privacy is threatened as never before in modern history by the policies of the Bush white house and the Ashcroft justice department. The USA Patriot act is a greater threat to American liberty than any terrorist.

  • by

    gmanod

    Fri Dec 20 2002

    Privacy is essential for all Americans. What we choose to do is not the governments buissness. I especially would not trust the likes of George Bush and John Ashcroft with the new powers that they have recieved to spy on people. These men are seriously dangerous and threaten two-hundred years of constitutional law. Loki13 is a disgusting rascist.

  • by

    finlore

    Sat Apr 13 2002

    I think that privacy may well be one of the most important issues of the next decade, with the increasing sophistication of technology. Add to that our own fears, and personal privacy could easily become another casualty of 9/11. Once the right to personal privacy has been breached, it becomes very easy to lose other rights associated with it. Unlike Loki, though, I believe that EVERYONE should have the right to privacy. Invading an individual's privacy should be allowed only under exceptional circumstances clearly defined by law and adhered to by law enforcement agencies.

  • by

    loki13

    Mon Apr 01 2002

    I belive all hard working White Americans deserve complete privacy.

  • by

    thefreak

    Mon Dec 10 2001

    I can do no better in a comment like this than to quote them man who officially broke the record for the most privacy-deprived person in the world, Freddie Mercury-"I want my privacy, and I feel I've given a lot for it." That states my feelings exactly. Take care, everyone!

  • by

    ellajedlicka21

    Wed Oct 31 2001

    It is so imperative that we still, after most individual rights are taken away, have our right to privacy. It would be a travesty if this did not happen. If not, we might as well have telescreens and Big Brother as depicted in Orwell's 1984.

  • by

    abichara

    Tue Oct 30 2001

    Privacy is very important, considering the terrorist activity that is occuring in the United States. Recently, there has been talk in Washington about creating a new "Smart Card" system. It is a card that contains all of our information and it basically will define our identity. While I understand that we need to be more vigilent as a result of the terrorist threat, I believe that this will continue to dwindle down the level of privacy we have as citizens. A card that has all of our personal information may lead to other things that we do not know of yet; technology is eroding our privacy more and more every day. It has its good side, but there is the potential for abuse involved as well. In addition, we have the Patriot Act that President Bush signed into law that will allow for the FBI to use wiretaps more liberally among other things. I think that this is fine because the legislation has to be renewed every three years. This will make sure that no "Big Brother" type of bureaucracy i... Read more

This topic is on the following list(s)

Add to new list