Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register

Coalition Building

Added on 12/01/2003
RSS Icon

27 Reviews

irishgit
04/02/2008

Coalition Building 1

Probably his greatest weakness. He has been unable, in large part, to expand his legislative power base, even in times of personal popularity. 

He is, however, particularly adept at getting coalitions to rise up against him

Join to vote! 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

FranksWildYear s
04/02/2008

Coalition Building 5

Name one other world leader who could bring Estonia, Armenia and Tonga together on the world stage and get them to each commit almost 50 troops.  What's that?  Tonga was only there for 5 months in 2004?  How about Iceland?  They committed 2 soldiers in 2003 and there is speculation that they might still be there.

Join to vote! 0 Helpful / 2 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

decalod85
10/11/2007

Coalition Building 1

It's only a coalition if you don't pay for the other troops.  When you pay, they are called mercenaries.

Join to vote! 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

CanadaSucks
10/07/2006

Coalition Building 1

. . .only amongst the uneducated, the fearful, and the zealotry. . .

Join to vote! 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

alomewandsam
10/07/2006

Coalition Building 1

is this a joke?????????

Join to vote! 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

reaverto
04/29/2006

Coalition Building 1

Armenia has deployed a unit of 46 soldiers (a mixture of logistic, medical and support soldiers) to support the effort in Iraq, does this count?

Join to vote! 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

Sagekat
04/24/2005

Coalition Building 1

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! Coalition building...Dubya...HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! (ooops you made me choke on my pretzel)

Join to vote! 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

emj5687
04/10/2005

Coalition Building 1

regardless of whether or not you like Bush you can't really defend the position he's done a great job building coalitions.

Join to vote! 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

AndrewScott
10/25/2004

Coalition Building 1

It's almost too easy to fault Bush on not building more coalitions. To save face, we Americans have pushed the idea that the U.N. and similar international alliances are of no value. But having fewer allies is certainly to our detriment. There is strength in numbers. It will be much more challenging to address new international conflicts with key alliances weakened.

Join to vote! 4 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

Daccory
10/21/2004

Coalition Building 1

There was no coalition of the willing. Neither the Spanish, the Italian, the British nor a good part of the Australian public believed in George's war. Maybe just Poland. It was the leaders of these countries, operating under some maniacal idealism, who joined in (even then reluctantly because of public disagreement.) Bush has alienated most countries in the world, even those who had a great relationship with America. Bush couldn't tie his shoelaces together.

Join to vote! 4 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

abichara
10/20/2004

Coalition Building 2

Don't forget about Poland!

Join to vote! 4 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

bibliophile
07/28/2004

Coalition Building 1

Coalition Building? Is that where they store Cheney's coal? On a more serious note, really, who needs a broad coalition to accomplish anything? Not this administration, evidently.

Join to vote! 5 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

ldave_x
01/29/2004

Coalition Building 1

Dubya thinks this is where they keep the coal to heat the Whitehouse.

Join to vote! 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

Enkidu
11/19/2003

Coalition Building 1

He's shown admirable initiative and ability at building coalitions of oil company interests. Oh, and building consensus among leaders of multinational corporations as diverse as Enron and WorldCom. Pretty amazing stuff: hasn't been done so well since the nineteenth century.

Join to vote! 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

kingbaby
11/18/2003

Coalition Building 1

Whatever coalition there was is falling apart.

Join to vote! 4 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

Moosekarloff
10/10/2003

Coalition Building 1

What a joke. What coalition? First off, the Great Uniter, recklessly bent on his military misadventure/oil grab/neo-christian crusade, told the U.N. to drop dead, that its sanctions weren't working and that the search by its weapons inspectors should be abandoned so that the jingo fireworks could begin. This indicates the anxiety and impatience of a failed Presidential administration when confronted with a well-merited plunge in public opinion polls. Then, the Pretender-In-Chief told members of what used to be considered the Western Alliance that their reasonable concerns with and resistance to war in Iraq were unfounded, and that if you weren't with us on this, you were against us. Basically: "Drop dead." Then the figurehead of that retarded cadre of saber-rattlers who really run the show told the rest of the world: "We don't care what you think, we're going ahead with this blessed initiative. Drop dead." As a result, the only support received by the U.S. from the world community was some tepid and wan lipservice and a handful of troops from a few insignificant countries, plus canon fodder provided by Bush's fist puppet, Tony Blair. Today, nearly six months after the so-called "end of hostilities," anarchy, armed confrontation and bloodshed are the everyday cruel realities of Iraq, cruel realities our vaunted military appears to be pretty lame at containing or dispelling. If anything, our military presence there is a major contributing factor to the social unrest and continued violence. And it turns out that the U.N. sanctions were indeed effective, as evidenced in the outcome of the war and what was learned about Iraq after Saddam bolted out of there. And maybe the U.N. weapons inspectors should have been granted more time to complete their job: this would have saved the American taxpayers about $600 million that the Douche Administration wants to spend in a futile effort to locate WMD that may never have existed in the first place, or were so few in number that they posed a threat to no one. But that's another issue. The issue is this: the U.S. has something like 156,000 combat troops committed to Irag, which even the Pentagon thinks is an overextension of our armed forces that might make this country vulnerable in the event of threats to our security elsewhere in the world. The so-called "coalition" has committed less than 10,000 soldiers to this effort. Now that the winning the peace has proven, as those supposedly anti-American, Saddam-loving liberals and peaceniks loudly warned prior to the start of hostilities, to be much more difficult and elusive than beating the crap out of a fifth-rate army of a fourth-rate despot in a third world country, and that Bushie and his boys bit off more than they could chew, it's a much different story. Recently, our Presidential Impersonator marched off to the U.N. to plead to the former Western Alliance and the rest of the world: "Help us. Commit your troops to the war we started and can't finish. Contribute billions of dollars to help clean up the mess the U.S. made in Iraq. Forget our arrogance and idiocy and rashness of six months ago. No hard feelings. Let's move on." And how has the U.N., former Western Alliance and rest of the world responded? "Drop dead." And for good reason. So, despite the fact the GOP and political right sold GWB, a worthless bill of goods, as such a bridge-builder, master of compromise, etc. during the promises of Campaign 2000, it turns out that this clown doesn't have a clue how to bring people together. This has made the U.S. look weak in the eyes of the world, truly reduced our geopotlical influence and stature and essentially burned down the bank in terms of gaining international support for whatever enterprise this country might need to undertake in the future. Furthermore, internally, this ill-advised military misadventure has severely divided this country, and the end result is unlikely to be a "divide and conquer" political victory for Daddy's Little Boy. According to a weighted average of the eight major public opinion polls conducted over the past two weeks, Bushie's approval rating stands at 51.4% a mere 13 months before the 2004 election. No wonder the poor moron is currently experiencing such flopsweat. No wonder the White House is quite, quite concerned about the severe erosion of support Bushie once enjoyed in the political midground. It's certainly well-deserved, and the way things are going, the Dems are looking increasingly more threatening to the Texas Governor, even with the fairly lackluster roster of wannabes that party is currently serving up. If anything, GWB has proven to be one of the most polarizing Presidents in U.S. History, and the rest of the world is patiently standing by, hoping that the American electorate finally uses what little brains it has and turns out this twerp as a One Term Wonder next November.

Join to vote! 10 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

snlgirl
07/17/2003

Coalition Building 2

Bush alienated almost everyone we wanted to make a coalition with. The only reason I didn't give him terrible is because he did convince some countries to join our coalition.

Join to vote! 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

BIGBABY
05/20/2003

Coalition Building 5

We are definetely building a coalition against terrorists. Everyone thinks that we are going in Iraq alone. We are not. England, Australia, Turkey, and Japan are all offering support. There is also a bunch of smaller nations who are helping with air bases usage, funding, as well as intelligence.

Join to vote! 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

Redoedo
05/18/2003

Coalition Building 2

Hmm... judging from the divisions in this country and around the world, I don't think that coalition building is Bush's forte. You're not going to build a coalition by deeming all those who may have a different solution to the problem traitors.

Join to vote! 4 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

twinmom101
05/14/2003

Coalition Building 1

If England counts, that's it. The rest of the world thinks he's a moron.

Join to vote! 5 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

Joe23665
04/23/2003

Coalition Building 1

Ko-u-litn, uh, make everyone mad. Yeah, that's the ticket. Coalition of the billing, leaning on those countries like a mob loan shark.

Join to vote! 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

TheMyth17
04/07/2003

Coalition Building 4

During the Persian Gulf War, we had 30 allies aiding us. In this war, we OVER 45. JUST BECAUSE HOLLYWOOD AND FRANCE DON'T SUPPORT THE WAR, BUSH HAS "FAILED" WITH DIPLOMACY. BULL.

Join to vote! 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

WilShakes1
02/26/2003

Coalition Building 1

He has been an utter, abject failure. If he continues on his present course, he will not only fail to build consensus on Iraq, he risks fracturing not only the UN but NATO as well, destroying structures it took the world over 50 years to erect.

Join to vote! 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

jdawg1751
02/24/2003

Coalition Building 4

Need to be more patient, but overall a good job, screw what the French say.

Join to vote! 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

Compie
02/11/2003

Coalition Building 1

Bush has done a credible job of building a domestic coalition of the Far-Out and the Far-Right, but I presume this question had international coalitions in mind - at which he is quite obviously a dismal failure.

Join to vote! 5 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

NickDanger
02/11/2003

Coalition Building 1

His coalition building skills were highly touted during the election, yet I'm seen no evidence of them in his presidency. He has pursued his own narrow agenda with little regard for other views, most notably the international arena. He will have his war on Iraq, no matter what the rest of the world has to say about it. And his "coalition" will be markedly smaller than his father's was. At this writing, we're seeing the results of his cowboy swagger in the form of NATO recalcitrance on Turkey; things might also be going better in the Security Council with a little less arrogance from the White House.

Join to vote! 5 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

anmalone
02/10/2003

Coalition Building 5

Too much effort to appease the morally corrupt.

Join to vote! 4 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

27 reviews!     « Previous  |  Page    of  1  |  Next »

view stats
1.76
average based on 83 ratings