lol, reminded my of my brothers lmao

This movie is a classic! but it isnt the most funny movie ever by any means.

If your not going to get Jim Carrey or Jeff Daniels, then don't make the movie. There also was WAY to much of a storyline.

Great movie and not boring. Bob Sagets performance is A+! Bloopers were great at the end of the movie.

I wish we could rate topics in the negatives, I would have to rate this a -5 then. The plot was a joke, thank god Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels didn't accept this sequel. It still would have sucked.

Even though it could've been better. It was still pretty funny.

I thought it was funny, but not as funny as if it would have had its origional actors. The overall quality of the movie was great but not as funny as the others.

Good gosh, the characters were bad, Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels weren't in it, of course, they don't look like Teens at all. Get the picture?! P.S: Plus, the girl teen was no cool, she drives an old person car, Mary Swanson on Dumb and Dumber was better looking.

Pretty crappy movie, but I had to give an extra star for Eugene Levy and Bob Saget's characters.

Actually, if Bob Saget's cameo was the only humourous thing about this movie, that should tell you how horrendous it truly is. Just a horrible waste of space...why anyone would waste money on it is beyond me...

Even dumberer than the first. There were a few amusing parts, but the film lacked the charm the first one had. Bob Saget's humorous cameo was perhaps one of the only redeeming things about this film.

If you loved the first one you'll love this one. I thought a sequel would suck but I was wrong,it was hilarious, I haven't laughed that much at a movie in a long time.

The first Dumb and Dumber was a lot of fun so I watched this expecting to laugh. This sequel had the same style of humor but it wasn't nearly as funny. The storyline was better in the first one and what I realized is that Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels really made that movie what it was. These new guys were younger and just weren't as good actors.

Hill, you BET this movie is good? You should really see a movie before you review it. You know what they say about people who assume...

I seen the first one and it was very funny.And i bet this one is too.

Was this REALLY necessary?

Harry and Lloydd should shoot the director of this film. The first one was hilarious and then they go and ruin it in the second one. I can't believe that I spent $20 to see this, and to think that I was excited to see it. Bummer. What a disappoinment!

This movie should have never been made. It gaves Harry and Lloyd a bad name.

Passable, I guess.

Please take away the pain..

I went to see this thinking it would not be very good but I was wrong. It is one of the funniest movies I have ever seen. I laughed so hard the whole time. I thought it was even funnier than the first. Everyone needs to see this movie.

I had to be dragged into the theater to see this one. I wasn't expecting a cinematic masterpiece or anything, but did it HAVE to be that painfully bad? The first one was better (and that's not saying much, obviously). The jokes were lame (again, not that I was expecting much), the "storyline" was terrible, it was just BAD. The movie lives up to its title all right, so I guess it's not false advertising, at least.