JeremyMK 10/16/2009
It is OK for a DSL modem. The wireless add on really isn't good (see separate review). Also, this only has one Ethernet port on the back, so you better be ready to buy a multiport router or switch if you do anything on a real network. Finally, a minor issue, it looks like there was more investment in the glowing qwest logo on the front, than any other feature of the device. Next time, I hope qwest spares me the glowing logo and gives me an extra Ethernet port! Buyer beware.
Helpful
Funny
Agree
Disagree
PSPS98101 09/18/2009
The M1000 is fine in most cases. But there's a bug in the firmware (all versions) that blocks port 80 from being passed through when this is configured for use with a /24 set of static addresses. Also, its MTU setting cannot be changed and will frequently fragment packets in PPPoE mode which can cause trouble (timeouts) on incoming connections if you're hosting an Exchange Server. Most of Qwest's new DSL circuits are configured as PPPoE now, but the DSLAMs support both, so set this to PPPoA and it will still train up and give you a nice 1500 MTU. In summary, if you're a /24 static IP customer who is hosting Exchange, use PPPoA. If you're hosting a web site, though, you'll have to go with another modem, like the Actiontec GT701 which will pass port 80.
Punter 08/01/2009
I am not a technology type person, I just know that I can get on line faster now that I have up graded to a new modem. I don't know what to say since it is my daughter who takes care of my technology needs/wants.
Mark2854 04/20/2009
I have been using this modem for over a year now, and it has worked flawlessly the whole time. (I use my Internet a LOT!). Qwest has upgraded the firmware for this modem a couple of times; so always check their site for the latest firmware. Easy to upgrade - and may well have resolved the previous negative reviewer's issues. I also just purchased the wireless adapter & plugged it into the top - works beautifully!
Laptop_Lizard 02/24/2009
The first one bricked. The second one refuses to enable port forwarding. The interface is clunky and doesn't render properly in some browsers. The log files aren't very illuminating.
5 reviews! « Previous | Page of 1 | Next »
Sort by Newest Oldest Most helpful Least helpful Highest rated Lowest rated