asskickingboot s 01/08/2006
Coles is a solid reciever, but his refusal to get the surgery he needed has cost him dearly. Now, he went from one of the finest deep burners to a player without the speed needed to burn any DBs that are above average. Initially I thought the Jets got the better end of the Coles-Santana Moss trade, but judging by their performances last year, it's hard not to say Moss has been the better reciever.
Helpful
Funny
Agree
Disagree
Beelzebub 01/13/2005
Laveranues? What the hell is a Laveranues? If this is his real name, he needs to change it to something real, and for that he gets one star. Oh, and he's just not that good!
ChrisO1981 01/08/2005
How can he even be in the top 10? He's garbage
martinema 12/21/2004
One of the best redskins offence players
Donovan_McNabb 03/04/2004
Well dude, look at how bad the skins are doing too. Honestly -- third place?
zuchinibut 10/13/2003
Laveranues is a playmaker. He has been a huge addition to the Redskins offense this year, and look at how the Jets are doing without him...not good.
kmbrlywl 09/08/2003
I think Laveranues Coles is a wonderful and constantly emerging wide reciever and is going to do big things with the redskins. I know the Jets felt some regret of not having him on there team after there lost to the redskins with the help of Laveranues.
7 reviews! « Previous | Page of 1 | Next »
Sort by Newest Oldest Most helpful Least helpful Highest rated Lowest rated