No way.  Three's Company was awesome.  It got better as it went on in my opinion.  I really liked the episode where Jack played 'The Mechanical Man' in a dept. store window, and the one where he did a cooking demo on public television.  Furley was great too.

A horrible show, with an even worse themesong.

Three's Company is art.  That it is regularly put on these silly lists of Worst TV Shows says more about television and the culture that watches it than it does about the show itself.  To say it is inane is to reveal inanity; to say it is the "best" is just as inane. It is in the canon, on a par with Aristophanes, Shakespeare, and the rest.

To be honest, I only watched bits of this show over the years. Even as a teenager, I found the very idea of it dull and idiotic. John Ritter had a certain comedic flair, and I thought Norman Fell was funny, but the constant, tiresome "joke" of the show (heterosexual male pretends to be gay so he can room with 2 attractive women) wore thin very quickly and trying to make this inherently stale premise seem fresh would have tried even the genius of a Jackie Gleason or a Sid Caesar. I always considered it absurb that Suzanne Somers demanded such a massive increase in salary because of her "invaluable" contributions to this piece of tripe. Quite frankly, I didn't find her all that sexy, even as a teenage boy who was "turned on" by almost any female with blond hair and large breasts. Also, I thought she was massively untalented. Arrogance is never an attractive trait in anyone, but it's a bit more palatable if the arrogant person in question can back up their egocentricity with some objectively commendable attribute. Somers had nothing more going for her than hubris and an offputtingly aggressive husband. Oddly enough, when I occasionally catch her now as a "mature" woman on TV infomercials hawking "Thigh-master", I find her to be much more attractive and sexy than she ever was during her "TV sex bomb" days.

This was a smarmy piece of dreck! Let's see now two girls and a guy living together. Oh my, what COULD they be doing?

i thoughtthrees company was funny. jack tripper played by the late john ritter was a sweet adorable character. joyce dewitt and suzanne somers feud over their importance to the show should have woke up and realize it was neither of them . ritter was the one that was the shining star of threes company and they should have appreciated what they had instead of being so greedy

I liked this show. It was always good for several laughs

Ugh!!! Hate this show with a passion!

This was not meant to be Shakespeare, I thought it was hilarious, and quite tame by todays standards. John Ritter was one of the most underrated comedians in sitcom history.

A SHOW THATS IN MY TOP TEN CLASSIC

Shut up all of you! Three's Company was an awesome show, except for the bits with Suzanne Somers, who I can't stand. John Ritter was probably the funniest guy on television at that time (no really, who was his competition? Murdoch from A-Team?) Who cares that the plots were mostly the same, with misunderstandings and double-entendres? Any Shakespearean comedy is structured the same way. Not that Three's Company is comparable to Shakespeare, but it was pretty good anyway.

i like Three's Company at first then it got old real fast. How many times can one laugh at the same situation. as hearing part of a conversation and misunderstanding what is going on. or the double meanings. all the cast changes too. It was on far longer than it should have.

Three's Company is right up there with Friends, Full House, and Green Acres on my list of sitcoms that I can't stand to watch. Every episode of Three's company is basically the same. Someone misunderstands something, hilarity ensues, and the misunderstanding is explained, all the while, double entendres are made. I'd rather swim naked through boiling, shark-infested waters with weights tied to my ankles and wrists than watch this crap.