He appears to be taking OJ Simpson's lead on finding the real killers.

It's not that he stopped looking, it's that he stopped looking in the right spot...

Did not stop. Sometimes it's hard to kill roaches when they hide.

Because he thought Saddam was a bigger threat, which saddam never was.

Bin Laden is probably dead. But I do think that we should have kept our focus in combating terrorism in Central and South Asia, as opposed to spreading the war into the Middle East.

In truth, I don't think it's an issue relating to intelligence. I think Bush really doesn't give a s**t. His primary interest was always Iraq, and 9/11 gave him a pretext, however convoluted and distorted that pretext was, to involve the U.S. in his own private vendetta.

LOL yes, he is in Iraq, no he's in my backyard, maybe he is on the moon. Who knows what stupid made up excuse we will here next.

Honestly I don't think Bin Laden was ever a priority for Bush. He was just a boogeyman that Bush used to get us all terrified. He got us terrified enough to allow him to push his own sick agenda to the forefront. Get people scared enough and they'll agree to anything. Get them feeling Patriotic enough and they'll forget who we were chasing in the first place. Right George? As for those who disagree with what I just said, why is it that Bin Laden went from Public Enemy number one to not important right before the Iraq war was launched? I guess he was only important enough to get the Patriot Act pushed through in record time.

Bush is more obsessed with Saddam Hussein than Osama bin Laden. Bush don't care much about Osama bin Laden because did nothing against his daddy (Bush 41).

What's more important: catching the dude responsible for the biggest attack since Pearl Harbor or inventing a war under false pretenses? You have your answer, kids.

You sick twisted Liberals, if we find Bin Laden and kill him Al-Queda won't have a huge figurehead so we're still looking for him. P.S: Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha, John Kerry lost! 8^)

You're a freak'in idiot Ledzep44. Since when did he say that he stopped looking for Bin ladin?

he didn't stop. DUH!!

Meh, he's making more progress than his predecessor.

Whereas we have been looking for him for quite some time, we have not put as much resources into this as we should. People compaired 9/11 to Pearl Harbor. Compair what we did then and what we're doing now and you'll see the problem.

I agree with CASTLEBEE. The CIA has not yet given up their investigation. LEDZEP, quit degrading the guy down to the lowest common denominator, and be satisfied with what's already happened in the Middle East.

I sincerely doubt that. Just because you don't see information about something constantly being run across the bottom of your TV screen doesn't mean it's not going. Think about it - just what reason does he have NOT to find this jerk? Capturing that maniac would be the biggest coup since the beginning of time. Even if Bush and company only cared about their approval ratings this alone would assure them one that would soar into the next millennium. Good grief, how naïve.

When have we done this?

As Djahuti pointed out, the Bushes are tight with the bin Ladens. And besides Bush is a classic bully. It's easier to go after small fry like Saddam Hussein to go after a monster like Osama bin Laden.

This is no suprise,as his family is very tight with the Bin Ladens.Maybe that does not include Osama,but just imagine the uproar it would cause if say,the Kerrys or Clintons were chummy with them!

Anyone who thinks the key to ending Al-Queda is finding Bin Laden is misguided, ignorant, or both. As is, his influence is very limited. He moves daily from cave to cave because the search for him is never ending. The priority can not be soleley on catching this one individual. The problems with terrorism are far deeper than that.

We know he is in Pakistan, but what are we gonna do?The Pakistanis are not going to let us just sweep through the country at will.

Iraq, yeah, that's where he is.

did he ever start looking?