| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | FranksWildYears (48)
11/21/2007 | He appears to be taking OJ Simpson's lead on finding the real killers.
(1 voted this helpful, 1 funny and 1 agree) |
 | MariusQelDroma (36)
11/21/2007 | It's not that he stopped looking, it's that he stopped looking in the right spot...
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Donovan (130)
11/20/2007 | Did not stop. Sometimes it's hard to kill roaches when they hide.
(0 voted this helpful, 1 funny and 1 agree) |
 | X Factor Z (13)
11/20/2007 | Because he thought Saddam was a bigger threat, which saddam never was.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | abichara (60)
04/07/2006 | Bin Laden is probably dead. But I do think that we should have kept our focus in combating terrorism in Central and South Asia, as opposed to spreading the war into the Middle East.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | edt4 (99)
06/21/2005 | In truth, I don't think it's an issue relating to intelligence. I think Bush really doesn't give a s**t. His primary interest was always Iraq, and 9/11 gave him a pretext, however convoluted and distorted that pretext was, to involve the U.S. in his own private vendetta.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Inmyopinion (10)
06/04/2005 | LOL yes, he is in Iraq, no he's in my backyard, maybe he is on the moon. Who knows what stupid made up excuse we will here next.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Wid71 (9)
05/01/2005 | Honestly I don't think Bin Laden was ever a priority for Bush. He was just a boogeyman that Bush used to get us all terrified. He got us terrified enough to allow him to push his own sick agenda to the forefront. Get people scared enough and they'll agree to anything. Get them feeling Patriotic enough and they'll forget who we were chasing in the first place. Right George?
As for those who disagree with what I just said, why is it that Bin Laden went from Public Enemy number one to not important right before the Iraq war was launched? I guess he was only important enough to get the Patriot Act pushed through in record time.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Jar-Jar Binks (16)
04/06/2005 | Bush is more obsessed with Saddam Hussein than Osama bin Laden. Bush don't care much about Osama bin Laden because did nothing against his daddy (Bush 41).
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | CanadaSucks (45)
03/03/2005 | What's more important: catching the dude responsible for the biggest attack since Pearl Harbor or inventing a war under false pretenses? You have your answer, kids.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | drbowler (14)
02/28/2005 | You sick twisted Liberals, if we find Bin Laden and kill him Al-Queda won't have a huge figurehead so we're still looking for him.
P.S: Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha, John Kerry lost! 8^)
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | cooljda (1)
02/13/2005 | You're a freak'in idiot Ledzep44. Since when did he say that he stopped looking for Bin ladin?
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 1 agree) |
 | SpecialboothvicJr. (10)
01/17/2005 | he didn't stop. DUH!!
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 1 agree) |
 | Redoedo (39)
01/09/2005 | Meh, he's making more progress than his predecessor.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| jirai (0)
01/07/2005 | Whereas we have been looking for him for quite some time, we have not put as much resources into this as we should. People compaired 9/11 to Pearl Harbor. Compair what we did then and what we're doing now and you'll see the problem.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Major of the ROTC (1)
01/06/2005 | I agree with CASTLEBEE. The CIA has not yet given up their investigation. LEDZEP, quit degrading the guy down to the lowest common denominator, and be satisfied with what's already happened in the Middle East.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | CastleBee (81)
01/06/2005 | I sincerely doubt that. Just because you don't see information about something constantly being run across the bottom of your TV screen doesn't mean it's not going. Think about it - just what reason does he have NOT to find this jerk? Capturing that maniac would be the biggest coup since the beginning of time. Even if Bush and company only cared about their approval ratings this alone would assure them one that would soar into the next millennium. Good grief, how naïve.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | BIGBABY (10)
01/05/2005 | When have we done this?
(8 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | scarletfeather (47)
01/04/2005 | As Djahuti pointed out, the Bushes are tight with the bin Ladens. And besides Bush is a classic bully. It's easier to go after small fry like Saddam Hussein to go after a monster like Osama bin Laden.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Djahuti (54)
01/04/2005 | This is no suprise,as his family is very tight with the Bin Ladens.Maybe that does not include Osama,but just imagine the uproar it would cause if say,the Kerrys or Clintons were chummy with them!
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | jamestkirk (23)
01/04/2005 | Anyone who thinks the key to ending Al-Queda is finding Bin Laden is misguided, ignorant, or both. As is, his influence is very limited. He moves daily from cave to cave because the search for him is never ending. The priority can not be soleley on catching this one individual. The problems with terrorism are far deeper than that.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | louiethe20th (74)
01/04/2005 | We know he is in Pakistan, but what are we gonna do?The Pakistanis are not going to let us just sweep through the country at will.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | TriSec (2)
01/04/2005 | Iraq, yeah, that's where he is.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Skizero (13)
01/04/2005 | did he ever start looking?
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-24 OF 24 | View All |
