Did we need to know every detail about the whole thing?

This got old long before it became intolerable.

I don't understand why it was such a shock,t hat the media thought the public would want to here a review everyday. It should have remained a private matter, as it was an affair; he wasn't laundering money from the government..now THAT, I could have seen making national news, not what he does in his private time, when his wife isn't looking.

this was a circus . this should have been a private matter. i felt bad for senator clinton. she had to be strong though i know inside she was hurting and embrrassed and she could do nothing to stop it and she wasn't given the option of how much shewanted know or needed to know or could handle to know. she just had to deal with it. everyone was so concerned in the incident that they never took time to consider all the pain it was causing someone. i mean it was important to the the running of this country wasnt it? if president clinton had been paying attention he would have had time to focus on the WMD in iraq like president bush. oh there isnt any? oh thats ok at least he didnt fool around and get caught.

Well there more they make fun of him the merrier.

For a man who is constantly lauded for his academic brilliance I can't for the life of me understand how he missed out on the definition of the word discretion. If he had understood and applied that one thing to his life the rest of the world may have been spared any knowledge of this little tryst.

This may be a part of U.S. history that will never us (at least not for half a century for sure). Has Clinton proven to be a morally bankrupt candidate...sure. Did he disobey U.S. law (lying under oath)...yes. Did he deserve to get impeeched...of course. However, do really need to have Clinton's sexual exploits in front of my face 24/7(let alone this specific incident)....NO! I know what happened. If I wanna learn more, I'll look it up. GEt to something that is more important.

It was bad enough that they had to tell me about the stained dress but did they really need to show me photographic evidence? For once could these people just let my imagination do what it's supposed to?

Considering how most of the stories on Bill and Monica were complete lies and consipracies, I would definately say this received way too much media exposure. Which of course was started by President Clinton's enemies. Monica was nothing but a home wrecking whore who has made up tons of lies about President Clinton. I would say maybe only 1/4 of these lies were even true.

Way too much information. There ought to be a little respect for the Presidency. I'm not defending Clinton now, but I think some of the House prosecutors were a little zealous in going after Clinton. Maybe Clinton was trailer trash, but the level of respect for the office was cut down a notch by having the man answer questions about the nature of oral sex. I didn't really like Clinton, but that whole show didn't really look good for America as a whole. And as for Monica, here she is profiting from the whole thing. Atrocious!! She's another one that really can't get away from the cameras, or she looks for them.

This owman's had her fifteen minutes of fame, and now it's time for her to get out of the spotlight. I think that the president f**ked up very badly and that Kenneth Starr is a sick pervert.

Did we really need to know about the stain on the dress?