I think its great.

And I speak as a purist who thought it would be awful. Probably the best decision baseball has made in 50 years.

I was wrong about this. I thought it was a fraudulent idea.

Looks like a good move. . .a fun change in the schedule. . .new teams and unis I'm not used to seeing. . .Bud Selig (who will be remembered as one of the worst leaders of major sports) simply lucked his way into a good decision. . .

I love it. It is a chance to see different teams. They should reformat the schedule so that everybody plays at least one series against everyone else, sort of like the NBA. That would help with revenue. It has been proven that when the Yankees are in town, attendence goes up.

I appreciate the fact that they've tried to make it so that no team from one league faces a team from another league that isn't their main rival every year. I enjoy watching interleague play because you get to see different matchups each year. And plus, the first interleague game ever was won by the Giants. :) It's a perfect opportunity to gain ground on the leader in your division or widen your lead if you are the leader.

Works fine. Bud Selig has done the job as commissioner.

This has been the best thing baseball has done in the past 25 years. I'd love to see more NL teams come through Boston, though. C'mon, we haven't seen the Cubs, Reds, Cardinals, or any Western teams yet. What gives?

Terrible.

There's got to be a better way to run this. Matchups are regional or random it seems and can cause an unfair balance in the strength of schedule between divisional teams. Nothing will ever be perfect but it could be worked on and improved.

Great for some cities and not a factor for others. At least it generates a midseason bump in interest.

I think interleague play is stupid, but I wouldn't say that it is a problem for baseball. It probably helps baseball with attendance, but thats about it for me.