| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | CastleBee (81)
04/25/2005 | I'm afraid it's not would but did. I think he's actually a verneral disease. Hopefully, he won't be allowed to continue to run rampant.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | texasyankee (21)
04/23/2005 | What does harm mean? Does it merely mean physical? No. It also means emotionally. In this case, I don't think Jackson has the capability to understand that someone has emotional feelings as well as physical, probably because of how he himself is. Therefore, yes he would harm a child.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Jar-Jar Binks (16)
04/23/2005 | I have never seen a child cared by him with scratches, scars, and bruises in his body. I don't think Jacko is that stupid.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | BeatlesfanSteveo (4)
07/01/2004 | No way he wouldn't hurt a fly.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | DickWeener (0)
02/10/2004 | He would hurt a Child
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| oldiesmusicfan101 (3)
02/05/2004 | Ya, and I'm the King of England
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Todd Parker (0)
12/17/2003 | Michael is innocent! He said so himself. These scurilous charges will be proven false in a court of law. He would never harm a child in any way. A female one, at least. Seriously, if this guy loves children so much, how come the only ones he invites into his private toy shop at Neverland are boys? MJ is sicker than any of us can even imagine and should be put to death (or at least chemically castrated) before he lays his finger on another child's private zones. Find a happy place, find a happy place!
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | pabob (2)
11/25/2003 | The key word here is NEVER. The majority of the time, if not ALMOST every time, I would say no. However, if he maybe even once sexually molested a minor, then he has harmed a child.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-8 OF 8 | View All |
