| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | lmorovan (18)
04/13/2008 | Hiroshima was meant to end the war. It didn't. On the contrary, the Japanese were more determined to eliminate the American forces than never before. Nagasaki brought them back to their sense and to reality.
(2 voted this helpful, 3 funny and 0 agree) |
 | faz159 (0)
01/26/2007 | Hiroshima's bombing was justified because it was needed to end the war but Nagasaki's bombing was unnecessary. It a unhumane science experiment. Hiroshima's bombing was made of uranium. Nagasaki's bomb was made of Plutonium. America just neededt to know which worked better.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | jgls (14)
01/03/2004 | the blood of the japanese who died at nagasaki is on the hands of the japanese high command who refused to surrender after witnessing first hand the unparalleled destruction of the bomb dropped on hiroshima.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Jaws (10)
01/02/2004 | No, they were both justified. We gave Japan the opportunity to surrender before the second bomb was dropped. According to the Japanese code of honor at that time it was more important to die with honor that to ever surrender.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-4 OF 4 | View All |
