RateItAll.com - The Opinion Network
1) Find and share opinions on anything; 2) Publish your own ratings list and share it on any site; 3) Make a little money

Ratings Breakdown

  • 34
  • 11
  • 11
  • 9
  • 28

Hottest Topics

Hottest Weblists

Related Websites

Peter, Paul & MaryGet Rating Widget!

Overall Rating:2.85 based on 93 ratings
ItemImageThe most popular folk group of the 1960s, Peter, Paul & Mary in later decades have also proved themselves to be among the most durable music acts in history. Their longevity dwarfs that of the Weavers, while the fact that the trio continues to be associated with a major record label (Warner Bros.) after decades in the business sets them apart from rivals like the Kingston Trio and the Brothers Four. Then again, perhaps it isn't so surprising — Peter, Paul & Mary's roots run deeper than almost any other folk ... Read More... at allmusic.com

Your rating:     (Roll over your star rating, then click) (5=Should already be in)
Notify me by email when someone comments on my review
Notify me by email when someone reviews this item
 

Reviews for Peter, Paul & Mary  1-11 OF 11

Browse next item:
Petula Clark
Sort items by:
REVIEWERRATING & REVIEW
MapleRock (3)
05/26/2008
2 rabbis and a hooker

  (0 voted this helpful, 1 funny and 0 agree)
Moose74 (6)
05/04/2008
Peter, Paul, &Mary should not be penalized for being considered primarily folk any more than Johnny Cash for being primarily country. Cash is in the HOF, and P,P,&M should be also. For many people, the first Dylan songs they ever heard were done by Peter, Paul & Mary.

  (2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
Travelerdiogenes (0)
03/30/2008
Great group in their time, but FOLK singers, not rock and roll. And not only folk singers, but about the last of their genre that was widely known, and had pretty much zero effect on music following their time. Don't get me wrong: I LIKED them. And they belong in a Hall of Fame, just not this one.

  (0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
MorrisseyFan (0)
03/22/2007
Why are they not in!

  (2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
marto (3)
09/16/2006
yes forgod sake put em in

  (0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
rockerrreds (7)
07/20/2006
Not rock,and not very good either.Leave 'em out.

  (1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
Habs10 (1)
03/13/2006
Some pelasant folk tunes, but let's leave the self-described "two jews and a hooker" out.

  (3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
sfalconer (21)
11/21/2005
What part of Rock and Roll do these guys fit into. They are folk not any where near Rock N'Roll and I have never heard any one say the were influenced by Peter, Paul or Mary.

  (1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
GenghisTheHun (168)
07/16/2005
They were not rock and rollers, but had lots of records on the pop charts.

  (2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
Flick01 (71)
03/25/2005
The early 1960s saw folk artists such as Peter, Paul, and Mary and The Kingston Trio having hits on the rock and roll chart. But in the strict sense of the term, folk music isn't rock music. (Funny though, Dylan's folk rock song Like A Rolling Stone was recently given an honor by rock oriented judges) If there was a folk wing of the Rock hall of fame then P P & M would deserve a place of honor but I don't think they should be in the rock hall of fame, even when comparing their music to other songs that were popular at the height of their career.

  (1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
alpepper (21)
03/25/2005
The only thing we should be giving these decrepit hippies is...KA-BONG!!!!

  (2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
1-11 OF 11View All
Add a rating badge for Peter, Paul & Mary to your site!
Add a rating badge to your site!
test