| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | Djahuti (54)
11/14/2005 | Isn't "she" Michael in a thin disguise?
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | souleater645 (0)
01/16/2005 | There is no way in hell, that a woman could have muscles and a 6-pack like her.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | marcm9999 (0)
07/18/2004 | I do not think musically she is very good at all. She appears to have more talent in the acting arena. Phony with lots of connections.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | LadyShark4534 (12)
04/26/2004 | I don't see her as a pop star. More R and B.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | inertiakiss (0)
04/17/2004 | she is so yuck.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | cromulance (1)
04/16/2004 | Would've been one star before the breast incident.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | jamestkirk (23)
04/16/2004 | The boob stunt was premeditated on her part, and to some degree it has paid off for her by keeping her name in the press and garnering her a host spot on SNL. Her new CD is sub-par, but that was expected. To say she is an irritating pop star is a stretch. She has been on the scene for quite some time. She is an established star in her own right and not deserving of an irritating label. I think the only irritating thing about her is her desperate grab at keeping her name in the limelight. She should be above all that and accept whether the mainstream public wants to continue listening to her new music and see her perform on the concert tour or not.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | freebird_0128 (5)
04/15/2004 | What irritates me most is she's really nothing special. She's spent her entire life cashing in on the Jackson family name (although why anyone would do that is beyond me). Her voice and acting talent have never been spectacular and now as she ages, she has to rely on cheap stunts. I won't mention any specifics though.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-8 OF 8 | View All |
