Linda Tripp
3
Hard to tell how much support I have for my generally positive opinion of whistleblowers, but here's how I analyze their actions. 1st, and most important, factor: Did the whistleblower expose the truth about one or more lies?
2nd: Were the lies of substantial consequence to the public, i.e., was it an itty bitty white lie that had little or no consequence, or was it a whopper that drastically affected the public? [Examples: Clinton's lie about not having had sex with Monica would have been an itty bitty one had he said it only once to, e.g., a reporter, and let it go, but he made it into a lie of consequence by vehemently stating it on television to the public (you and me, folks; I don't know about you, but I don't like being lied to by anyone, especially our leader) and, even worse, stating it under oath, thus committing perjury. A whopper of a lie that drastically affected the public? Bush II and Cheney lying about Saddam having WMD, in order to fool the public into buying into their invasion plans, which in truth were based on their neoconservative agenda to take out Saddam because he was an a**hole who deserved to be removed and because the U.S., as the world's sole superpower, could do whatever it wanted to.]
3rd: Were the whistleblower's methods of exposing the lie legal?
4th, and least important: What were the motives of the whistleblower? Least important because IMO it pales into insignificance when compared to the preceding factors.
As to Linda Tripp, she did expose the truth about a lie, the lie was of consequence to the public (perjury always is of consequence), her methods of exposing the lie included an illegality (tape-recording a conversation with someone without their consent is illegal) as well as some questionable morality (betrayal of a friend's confidences), although her true motives probably will never be known (was she spying on Monica and encouraging her confidences for the benefit of the Republican Party, or was she, as she claimed, merely trying to protect herself from retaliation from the Clinton Administration because while Monica had pleaded with her to lie under oath about what she knew of the affair, she wasn't going to do so).
So, giving weight to the various factors in the order of importance that I place upon them (you, of course, may disagree), I have to commend her for exposing the truth about a lie of substantial consquence to the public, while at the same time faulting her partially illegal and partially immoral method; her unknown motives are of little consequence.
On the other hand, Mark Felt (aka Deep Throat) gains my high praise. For my reasoning, see my review of his actions here.
[COMMENT: Mea culpa? I copied this review to this topic from another topic because it erroneously placed reviews of Linda Tripp under Actors.]