ThatOnePerson 01/28/2007
This man was the man that should have been elected. His views would have made this country better by improving the economy while, at the same time, helping out the social aspects of the country by making human life something that is treasured as special unlike many of his socialist opponents that want to promote the idea that humans are nothing but animals. Sad fact is that this man did not get the media attention that he deserved because of our corrupt and untrustworthy media. Think about this people, the media thinks you are NOT smart enough to think and that you should be led. That attitude for the world is something that this man tried to stop and we, the conformists and followers of that which big brother fed us, attacked Michael with words not our own and destroyed one of the few remaining chances to save a country which has been recked by conformity and inhumanity. Many candidates want to make the world one where you are told what to do, how to live, what you can and can not have – it is called socialism, progressivism, communism, and is usually the kind of thing that people call “positive social change”. Michael was the opposition, and we spat on him. We are the destroyers of this great nation, not terrorists or bird flu or sars or anthrax. Big brother will come when we, in our stupidity and self hate, fight for him and make him. Just think when the time comes again, just think.
Helpful
Funny
Agree
Disagree
James76255 01/24/2005
He's a nut! The Libertarian Party could have done so much better.
bsd987 11/03/2004
Anyone is better than Bush or Kerry.
icelroca 10/25/2004
This guy is no longer a candidate. What a joke!
Dawnsdinos 10/24/2004
I do agree with most of the Liberterian ideas, the only problem, is I seriously doubt in my lifetime we will see anyone other then Democrat or Republican in the White House, which is a shame because unfortunately a vote for any third party candidate is a wasted vote.
Vasyl 10/22/2004
Democrats and Republicans are both clueless about America's problems. George W Bush thinks that invading countries to make them free will solve global terrorism. Sorry Georgie, that's like hitting a hornet's nest with a baseball bat, you're only going to make it worse. Not to mention the fact that he doesn't listen to logical reasoning and fact ... And John Kerry, the anybody but Bush candidate. What a brilliant campaign. Let's get rid of the brain tumor in office right now and replace it with some testicular cancer. Smart. Kerry flaps in the wind more than a cat playing with catnip, just to make people happy and appease his anti-war/pro-war base. This isn't Vietnam anymore John, you're a Democrat now, you have no integrity. In either case, they both favor keeping America entangled in absurd and dangerous foreign affairs that America need not be involved in. And of course, they both like to say they control the economy when it's good, and it's the other party's fault when it's bad. What a joke. The reality is that neither party has major control over the economy. Bush doesn't outsource jobs and Kerry doesn't create jobs. It's up to the private sector. Hello! Am I the only person in America that can see through the partisan rhetoric?! I find it amazing that most Americans are dissatisfied with our government, yet they keep giving the twin headed Snake a free pass every four years. If you are in jail, and you have a 46% chance of the electric chair, a 48% chance of lethal injection, and 5% chance of ESCAPE ... what would you pick? I know where my vote is going, behind someone I can RESPECT, and I feel sorry for people who feel the need to settle with the lesser of two evils. IT'S TIME TO WAKE UP
gangstassnigga 10/21/2004
All i hear from John Kerry is : I have a plan. Yet i havent met a single person who can tell me what that plan is. All i hear from George W. Bush is grave danger, weapons of mass destructions, scary, scary, boo! and a little bit of not a matter of if but when. Badnarik is the only major candidate who actually has something substanitive to say about the issues. A debate including him would spell disaster for the Republicrats. They could barely handle Ross Perot back in the day. Dont waste your vote this time. Vote for the only candidate that is even suggesting the reduction of the federal government. If you vote Kerry/Bush you are saying to the bureaucrats in DC : I approve of the job you are doing. And who thinks that?
Mr.Political 10/20/2004
Liberatarian Party, huh? Sure, and why don't we just make Bin Laden the head of the Department of Defense...
Raider Duck 10/20/2004
Imagine: A Presidential candidate who actually understands the consitution! What a concept...
Hanseatic 10/14/2004
Want unbridled capitalism, free from any regulation? Think that only wealthy people should go to school? Think ZIP codes are unconstitutional? Vote Badnarik.
jagman28782 10/14/2004
I agree with the Libertarians on some issues, but I'm entirely on the other side on other issues. It is hard to get aboard the Libertarian Party to me.
apparati 09/26/2004
www.self-gov.org
TriSec 09/01/2004
The Dems are socialists and the Repugs are fascists; Libertarians are the only party that will truly preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States http://www.badnarik.org/
13 reviews! « Previous | Page of 1 | Next »
Sort by Newest Oldest Most helpful Least helpful Highest rated Lowest rated