| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | Drummond (54)
12/20/2005 | Probably the biggest non-covered story was his vindication by subsequent revelations. Will probably only become common knowledge if Rice runs for president - which is probably why she won't.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | OneHungryMonster (2)
09/03/2004 | Of the .1% of people who will read this book, 99% will be Democrats. It won't hurt him much.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | EschewObfuscation (61)
09/03/2004 | As jamestkirk correctly points out, this guy is pointed to by uninformed and rabidly partisan arguers without merit. His ax (personal gain motivation) is painfully obvious.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | bibliophile (10)
09/02/2004 | For anyone who actually read the book, they know this book is damning of the Bush admin's inaction, and Clarke isn't even trying to be unkind. Clarke is no extremist. The reason this won't have a great impact is because the very people who would learn the most from reading it are the exact ones who won't.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | John McCain (1)
06/27/2004 | Less skillful version of Woodward's book. Doesn't address the big picture.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | zeed (0)
06/22/2004 | A exsuse for everything, vote it a 5 already
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | CastleBee (81)
06/18/2004 | My impression is that this guy was having an attack of sour grapes. I don't think he's going to do the damage he'd like to.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | jamestkirk (23)
06/17/2004 | Condi Rice did a pretty good job of exposing Clarke's lack of credibilty and that he had an ax to grind against the President when she testified before the 9/11 panel.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-8 OF 8 | View All |
