RateItAll.com - The Opinion Network
1) Find and share opinions on anything; 2) Publish your own ratings list and share it on any site; 3) Make a little money

Ratings Breakdown

  • 2
  • 10

Hottest Topics

Hottest Weblists

"...The most important thing is for us is to find Osama Bin Laden" (Sept. 2001); "I don't know where he is. It's not that important. It's not our priority" (Mar. 2002)Get Rating Widget!

Overall Rating:4.83 based on 12 ratings
(Add picture or description)

Your rating:     (Roll over your star rating, then click) (5=Great)
Notify me by email when someone comments on my review
Notify me by email when someone reviews this item
 

Reviews for "...The most important thing is for us is to find Osama Bin Laden" (Sept. 2001); "I don't know where he is. It's not that important. It's not our priority" (Mar. 2002)  1-6 OF 6

Browse next item:
"It really depends upon how our nation conducts it
Sort items by:
REVIEWERRATING & REVIEW
doobiesNhof (21)
03/24/2006
Talking out of both sides of his mouth. I wish he would bite his tongue off.

  (2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
CanadaSucks (45)
05/04/2005
When will Americans learn that politicians simply move the target in order to keep us in line?

  (1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
dpostoskie (7)
05/04/2005
I don't know if he ever really cared. Bin Laden has a lot more friends than any of us know. We are suppose to be the most powerful country in the world with unlimited resouces and unbelieveable technology. If our government really gave a rats a** about getting Binny, he'd be six feet under getting to know his 70plus virgins.

  (1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
abichara (60)
10/07/2004
Well at least he knows that Osama bin Laden attacked America! He made this quote after the rather disasterous Tora Bora operation when we let bin Laden escape into the Hindu Kush. Like in Iraq, I think we declare victory too early in Afghanistan. The problem as I see it is that lot of the people in the Pentagon are still thinking in terms of a World War 2 paradigm. Those who question the effectiveness of our war strategies are somehow compared to appeasers in the mold of Neville Chamberlain. To them, merely toppling a regime means victory. The problem with this basic approach that we've taken in both Iraq and Afghanistan is that, yes, we may have achieved our objective in toppling the regimes in place, but the victory was far from total. Politically in both countries, we've left a bigger mess than was there before, thus leaving the door open for even bigger problems than were present beforehand. I do think we were correct to go into Afghanistan, but I think we should have made a stronger commitment to rooting out terrorism there and putting more boots on the ground there as opposed to in Iraq. Merely toppling the Taliban hasn't solved our problems, indeed, many regions in the country are still ruled by them. Hamid Karzai, the leader of that country, still hasn't established strong political ties there. Admittedly it is a difficult situation--it is such a fragmented country. We do have an obligation to find bin Laden and leave that country a better place than it was before. To do anything less would be irresponsible of us. At the same time, we do need something of an exit strategy.

  (0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
Anonymous (1)
08/04/2004
Ha, ha, ha! I always knew he didn't really care about finding Osama Bin Laden (except to reveal him a week before the election for political purposes).

  (0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
Joe23665 (0)
07/08/2004
Hmmm, seems like a flip-flop to me. I actually think he's been back and forth 3 or 4 times, depending on the polls he doesn't look at.

  (1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
1-6 OF 6View All
Add a rating badge for "...The most important thing is for us is to find Osama Bin Laden" (Sept. 2001); "I don't know where he is. It's not that important. It's not our priority" (Mar. 2002) to your site!
Add a rating badge to your site!
test