excelsior30 03/26/2005
Bound to be upsetted, and if they do go on to face Wake, they will stop there. >I was almost right, but surely a team that can face such pressure. Wake would give them a lot more and they may not overcome it. >> All right tboneya, I will give them one star and that's it as they are in the 16 the hard way, but they will stop there as Bob Knight knows how to coach other coaches. >>> Look closely at that Mountaneer team. they win because of such screens and three pointers that thay do. That is one reason that they upended TTu and might possibly win over Louisville. >>>> Close but no cigar. They were good enough but somehow, Louisville had changed their strategy and they trounced them. I would have wished that they were the next sub #5 seed to win but of course, there's always next year.
Helpful
Funny
Agree
Disagree
numbah16tdhaha 03/25/2005
The five is for the double OT win over Wake Forest, which is the barn burner of the tourney so far.
alpepper 03/25/2005
Who are these people. They are beating the Pittsnoggle out of everyone. Is Jerry West playing for them?
Blanco~Nino 03/15/2005
A mediocre team that will perform on a mediocre level in the tournament.
EschewObfuscat ion 03/14/2005
I look for them to beat Creighton and lose a close game to Wake Forest.
magellan 03/14/2005
The Mountaineers are dangerous - extremely well coached and playing their best ball of the season. They run sort of a Princeton offense - lots of back doors and pick and rolls, and they can make shots. Gansey is a big time player, and Pittsnogle will Pittsnogle you if you leave him open. I really enjoy watching this team play and would love to see them win a few games.
zuchinibut 03/14/2005
Finished strong in the Big East, but I don't think they have what it takes to make much noise in the tournament.
7 reviews! « Previous | Page of 1 | Next »
Sort by Newest Oldest Most helpful Least helpful Highest rated Lowest rated