the way he sat there at the trials showing no emotion was unsettling. he probably acted the same way when he coldly murdered his wife and unborn child.

scott peterson along with mark hacking here in utah have got to be 2 of the stupidest wife killers ever.they went to such great lengths to construct alibis that didnt set quite right with anyone. scott petersons demeanor from day 1 was devoid of any emotion whatsoever. he couldnt even try to make himself appear distraught or grieving to save his life. i better he never thought that lacy & his unborn child would bring such nationwide attention since he thought so little of them . mark hacking did the opposite his demeanor was too emotional that it came across immediately as fake. i think neither one of them have the ability to love somebody other than themselves that they are missing the key component needed to express real emotions so when they try and fake it they dont know how

Even before the (more powerful)evidence came to light; I suspected he was guilty. Most cases, such as those, are committed by someone close to home. Very sad really.

Guilty. Next case . . .

He's guilty of murder so yes, I believe he did it. You know why he did it? Because he was looking for a way out of his marriage and back to bachelorhood. Well he got his wish as a bachelor now did he?

Very likely, but I still can't justify puting him to death on circumstancial evidence.