| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | CanadaSucks (45)
05/11/2008 | No it doesn't. Just like it doesn't say that women should have the right to vote in its conception. The Constitution is only alive today because it can be modified. The day the document can't be modified begins the slow death march towards irrelevence- change with the times as people (gasp!) evolve. The document purposefully has language that is aphoristic at times to allow for interpretation and therin lies both the strength and the stress caused by the document. Both sides of many issues great and small have held the words of the constitution as validating their side. That this is actually an issue is a cause for laughter in many first-world nations that seem to have a notion of privacy, liberty and (gasp) choice that more than a few Americans could never stomach while waving a flag.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 1 agree) |
 | DynaSword11252 (26)
05/11/2008 | How many lives have they taken because of this morbid right? Abortion is nothing more than legal cold blooded silent murder.
(0 voted this helpful, 4 funny and 0 agree) |
 | lmorovan (12)
05/11/2008 | Never is there anything in the Constitution that protects the right to a murder. On the contrary, the Constitution protects the right to life, liberty and pursue of happiness to all Americans. Life begins at conception and is constitutionally protected. Unfortunately, the judges of the Supreme Court have taken upon themselves to decide when a life is life and when is not.
(2 voted this helpful, 4 funny and 1 agree) |
 | LanceRoxas (40)
05/29/2005 | The dissolution of our fundamental law to the degree jurists have protected the manufactured right to murder the unborn gives rise to the assessment that our system is in utter unfocused chaos. The deterioration of the process itself to end at this point-protecting murder- is achieved through the expansion of the 14th amendment's privileges clause at the expense of the due process clause, applying it to the 4th amendment's protection against unreasonable search and seizure; then granting the authority to the individual to deny the same privileges guaranteed the unborn through the 14th amendment by utilizing the due process clause previously excluded- and defining the person unviable. This circumlocution of the constitutional process to simply end at a predetermined goal is nothing short of judicial tyranny.
(6 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-4 OF 4 | View All |
