In the most recent post I may have won and had the case dismissed against him (even though he may have had prior felony conviction when he came into my office) and then custody action then proceeded with more time.

The latest post...well, ??!!

I helped you both...and wish you both luck in life.

But, your cases were not harmed and judges let me withdraw in both matters and no appeal was taken by either party. As a lawyer I will protect my clients rights, but as potential clients, you must also respect that we are also here because we are working. No person expects someone to do otherwise.

Very truly yours,


Tony Dalayanis

Please ready the post by "thissiteonly" because I too had a similar experience also through prepaid legal. To put it plainly Mr. Dalayanis screwed me. I paid him upfront and he did not keep his end of the deal. He then had the nerve to ask for more money. He never returned my phones calls, and the communcation is very poor.

It's cool though, because I am now handling my custody case on my own, and I'm doing well. I would be very cautious when using Tony as your attorney!!!

Amazing lawyer! Does what he promisses. Infact has done more than promissed and didn't charge extra. Did not charge my family for every phone call. DId not charge my family for all the paperwork or copies. He takes care of my family.

All the judges that ran into him liked him and listened to what he had to say. He did not lie to try to win, but presented the case in such a way that I was glad he was my lawyer and not the other person's.

I would take the time and watch him argue before Ohio Supreme Court.

www.OhioTrialLaw.com

Per Ohio Trial Law . com


Recent cases of Interest per Court Docket

(not indicative of any result or promise of representation---each case’s facts/circumstances control):

Tucker, et al. v. Akron Soap Box Derby - Breach of Agreement action against Soap Box Derby, 9th District.,
Sipe, et al. v. Nestor Traffic Systems, Inc. - Speeding Cameras and civil violations (Ohio Supreme Ct.),
Lino v. Great Lakes Trucking - Civil action resulting in negotiated settlement after litigation,
Eye, et al. v. Progressive, et al. - Civil action resulting in negotiated settlement after litigation,
Vasiliadis v. Nationwide, et al. - Civil action resulting in negotiated settlement after litigation,
Medina County Fair - Fair Explosion involving Steam Tractor (co-counsel),
Bogner,et al. v. Fallsview Hospital - Civil action resulting in $1.8mil verdict (co-counsel),
State of Ohio v. Leyman - 30+ Felony counts - per public record plea to 30 days alternating weekends,
State of Ohio v Consillio - 9th Appellate District (2/1) reversal of DNA requirement, affirmed Ohio Supreme Court,
State of Ohio v. Myers - Jury finding Defendant Not Guilty of Driving Under the Influence,
State of Ohio v. Miller - Defendant has Driving Under the Influence dismissed,
State of Ohio v. Knight - Defendant charged with F1 Rape (life in prison) - plea of M1,
Lawrence, et al. v. Reddick,et al. - Dog on dog attack, Jury Verdict of $899.00 (dog) + $4,500.00 (med. Bills);
State of Ohio v. Doe- potential charge of Murder - charge of Felony - plea of M1.,
State v. Looser - Criminal Jury Trial Not Guilty.

WOW!!!!

www.OhioTrialLaw.com

Sometimes people are stuck in a bind and need help. Sometimes people are stuck in a bind and dont want to take the written opinions of counsel to heart. That why he puts it in writing and has all the back up in his file. If you want to question if he warned you about potential outcomes or appeals, then make the letters public, otherwise blog postings are not going to change the facts and circumstances.

You want to see this guy argue...check him out in front of the OHIO SUPREME COURT wherein he successfully invalidated a retroactive DNA requirment that is now cited by Courts throughout in combatting retroactive laws that attempt to take away peoples rights. But, ultimately, he, like every other person working on this earth..is a business that must charge to survive. So, he works for food, like the rest of the world. But, unlike the rest of the world...this guy is good...he doesn't miss a beat... LOOK AT HIM BEFORE OHIO's SUPREME COURT!!!! NOT NERVOUS AT ALL!!!


check this guy out !!!!

WOW!!!

www.OhioTrialLaw.com

Be aware of positive ratings/comments on this site that may be not be genuine in an attempt to boost ratings. This attorney was supplied thru PrePaid Legal Services to provide representation in a lawsuit where a company had continued to bill a client for services, but had not complied with their contract and continually overcharged for services; as such, their bill was not paid; they then sued for collection plus interest. Dalayanis initially advised that the municipal court was likely to partially rule in their favor, but the satisfactory result could come in an appeals court. He charged upfront fixed fees for representation in both courts; then after being paid, refused to attend a court-ordered summary hearing in the lower court because he said he had not been paid to do such, but he actually did show up, only to ask the judge at that point to allow him to withdraw from the case. He then walked out of the commencement of the hearing with an inappropriate smart-ass remark to his client and left his client to defend himself without legal representation in front of the opposing attorney and judge! (He had never offered to bill his client for this representation if he felt he was not otherwise obligated to attend the hearing; yet his client had previously paid him immediately upfront for every dollar he had asked for prior to this, so therefore he had little reason to think that he would not be paid.) This attorney takes an approach to business that benefits him financially by being paid upfront and choosing where/when he wants to provide representation, possibly at the expense of his client, who by this approach has little control of the continuity of service or quality of representation; Dalayanis failed to completely research matters of importance to his client, and therefore did not argue case history properly, but he is a sharp-witted individual who puts on a flambouyant show in the courtroom that can work well as a quick get-in, get-out concept. However, in this approach, a judge who listens for substantive, supported argument, if finding little, may rule adversely. Attempted repeated communication to Dalayanis through his office or voicemail was poor; either inadequate or non-responsive; he does not communicate via email. Dalayanis lost the cases due to insufficient research and lack of follow-through with his client, probably resulting in ineffective argument. If you need an attorney for a quick hearing on a simple matter, this attorney may be fine, but if you need continued representation over the long term, where effective client communication, details and research are important, look elsewhere.

Wow!  This guy is awesome! Sleeper hit!  Tough and to the point.  This guy is a bulldog with a hidden puppy inside!  Perfect mix.  Great trial lawyer.!!!

Wow!!! This guy is a hit!!! Sleeper of a life time..

Great lawyer! Fight for your rights! Very smart and to the point.