| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | ilovetrash (0) 08/01/2007 | It had Ben Affleck in it. That's enough.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | kattwoman (24) 04/22/2006 | i never made it through the whole movie. i don't think i made it through half the movie.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Drummond (54) 01/09/2006 | Was bad, but my expectations were low.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | trebon1038 (62) 11/14/2005 | I couldn't make it through the whole movie...too long and quite boring
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | GenghisTheHun (168) 08/27/2005 | It's a stinker but the action scenes save a little off the top bad rating.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | yoyip2006 (0) 07/11/2005 | Michael Bay is a talentless hack!
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | JonTheMan (27) 06/25/2005 | Sorry, who thought this was good?
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | PzKpfw VI E (27) 06/25/2005 | Calling 'Tora! Tora! Tora!' better then 'Pearl Harbour' may just be the understatement of the century. T!T!T! was leaps and bounds ahead of Pearl Harbour. T!T!T! was good, but what made it so much better was the fact that Pearl Harbour may have been the worst film I have ever seen. It was completely inaccurate (I don't think they got any thing right. I am surprised they knew Pearl Harbour was in Hawaii) and the movie was just terrible in itself. Bad, bad, bad, bad, bad, bad, bad, movie.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Miss_Perverse (1) 06/25/2005 | The biggest piece of B.S. ever to grace motion pictures. A waste of money and a waste of film reels. Someone had the idea of exploiting a historical event for a lame love story. (Why?) They didn't even get the historical facts right. If I ever have to sit through just one minute of this film again, I'll pull out the hair on my arms ONE by ONE. It's funny, this film and Armageddon are the two pieces of schlock I despise, and they both star Ben Affleck. Does he intentionally pick big-budget, bogus writing garbage?
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | JukeBoxHero (1) 06/24/2005 | pearl harbor is a disgrace to war movies if u want to see a good war movie go watch full metal jacket
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | kamylienne (77) 05/22/2005 | The best part of this movie was the end. As in, AFTER the credits.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | CanadaSucks (45) 05/21/2005 | A disgusting, horrible, laughable movie. The vets deserved better than this hollywood shlock wrapped around a b.s. love story. Unbelievable. How could you ruin such a rich idea for a film?
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | bluetarbaby (8) 05/21/2005 | Like they say in that 'Team America: World Police' song making fun of this, they missed the point. I thought I was going to see like a 'Private Ryan' type flick in a different setting. I'm not sure what I saw, but I am sure it had nothing to do with the Japanese attacking Pearl Harbor. And Affleck is so lame. If I had that much power going for me, I would make damn sure I only did good movies from here on out. His money is set for life. Now do an indy, moron! - before you turn into Emilio Estevez. No, it doesn't even have to be an indy. Just pick a good script. In the words of Jadakiss, first respect, then money,...........basic sh%t. He has screwed that philosophy up, but he could still salvage something.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | CastleBee (81) 05/20/2005 | I beg to differ Iggy. This was not that appealing looked at from the Chick Flick point of view because that part was simply just slapped together. I say it was a special effects film with a meaningless, weak love story tacked on like a polka dot bow on a plaid package. Period.
(7 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-14 OF 14 | View All |